-
2
-
-
1842769254
-
-
NOU 1997: 18. Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste, Seksjon statens trykning
-
Norges offentlige utredninger. Prioriteringer på ny. NOU 1997: 18. Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste, Seksjon statens trykning, 1997.
-
(1997)
Norges Offentlige Utredninger. Prioriteringer På ny
-
-
-
4
-
-
0032541851
-
Rationing health care - How should it be done?
-
Kleinert S. Rationing health care - how should it be done? Lancet 1998; 352: 1244.
-
(1998)
Lancet
, vol.352
, pp. 1244
-
-
Kleinert, S.1
-
5
-
-
0029978223
-
Health care rationing: The public's debate
-
Bowling A. Health care rationing: the public's debate. BMJ 1996; 312: 670-4.
-
(1996)
BMJ
, vol.312
, pp. 670-674
-
-
Bowling, A.1
-
6
-
-
0032505636
-
The second phase of priority setting
-
Holm S. The second phase of priority setting. BMJ 1998; 17: 1000-2.
-
(1998)
BMJ
, vol.17
, pp. 1000-1002
-
-
Holm, S.1
-
7
-
-
0347108066
-
Health reforms and rationing in Israel
-
Chinitz D, Israeli A. Health reforms and rationing in Israel. Health Affairs 1997; 16: 205-10.
-
(1997)
Health Affairs
, vol.16
, pp. 205-210
-
-
Chinitz, D.1
Israeli, A.2
-
8
-
-
0028361248
-
Rationing alternatives for medical care
-
Phelps CE. Rationing alternatives for medical care. Ann Rev Public Health 1994; 15: 413-36.
-
(1994)
Ann Rev Public Health
, vol.15
, pp. 413-436
-
-
Phelps, C.E.1
-
9
-
-
0028345927
-
Health care in Canada: A system in turmoil
-
Rathwell T. Health care in Canada: a system in turmoil. Health Policy 1994; 24: 5-17.
-
(1994)
Health Policy
, vol.24
, pp. 5-17
-
-
Rathwell, T.1
-
10
-
-
0042184122
-
Muddling through elegantly: Finding the proper balance in rationing
-
Mechanic D. Muddling through elegantly: finding the proper balance in rationing. Health Affairs 1997; 16: 83-92.
-
(1997)
Health Affairs
, vol.16
, pp. 83-92
-
-
Mechanic, D.1
-
11
-
-
0031565415
-
Rationing within the NHS should be explicit - The case against
-
Coast J. Rationing within the NHS should be explicit - the case against. BMJ 1997; 314: 1118-22.
-
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.314
, pp. 1118-1122
-
-
Coast, J.1
-
12
-
-
0029061456
-
Dilemmas in rationing health care services: The case for implicit rationing
-
Mechanic D. Dilemmas in rationing health care services: the case for implicit rationing. BMJ 1995; 310: 1655-9.
-
(1995)
BMJ
, vol.310
, pp. 1655-1659
-
-
Mechanic, D.1
-
13
-
-
0031568695
-
The case against
-
Klein R. The case against. BMJ 1997; 314: 506-9.
-
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.314
, pp. 506-509
-
-
Klein, R.1
-
14
-
-
0033524122
-
Improving NHS performance: Human behaviour and health policy
-
Ham C. Improving NHS performance: human behaviour and health policy. BMJ 1999; 319: 1490-2.
-
(1999)
BMJ
, vol.319
, pp. 1490-1492
-
-
Ham, C.1
-
15
-
-
0028864329
-
Clinical practice guidelines - Do they enhance value for money in health care?
-
Grimshaw JM, Hutchinson A. Clinical practice guidelines - do they enhance value for money in health care? Br Med Bull 1995; 51: 927-40
-
(1995)
Br Med Bull
, vol.51
, pp. 927-940
-
-
Grimshaw, J.M.1
Hutchinson, A.2
-
16
-
-
0033610613
-
Healthcare rationing - Are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines?
-
Norheim OF. Healthcare rationing - are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines? BMJ 1999; 319: 1426-9.
-
(1999)
BMJ
, vol.319
, pp. 1426-1429
-
-
Norheim, O.F.1
-
17
-
-
0030991068
-
Rationing within the NHS should be explicit - The case for
-
Doyal L. Rationing within the NHS should be explicit - the case for. BMJ 314; 1997: 1114-8.
-
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.314
, pp. 1114-1118
-
-
Doyal, L.1
-
18
-
-
0031589870
-
The rationing debate: Central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions: The case against
-
Harrison S. The rationing debate: central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions: the case against. BMJ 1997; 314: 970-3.
-
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.314
, pp. 970-973
-
-
Harrison, S.1
-
19
-
-
0031033172
-
The New Zealand priority criteria project
-
Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project. BMJ 1997; 314: 131-4.
-
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.314
, pp. 131-134
-
-
Hadorn, D.C.1
Holmes, A.C.2
-
20
-
-
0028100309
-
Core services and priority-setting: The New Zealand experiences
-
Cumming J. Core services and priority-setting: the New Zealand experiences. Health Policy 1994; 29: 41-60.
-
(1994)
Health Policy
, vol.29
, pp. 41-60
-
-
Cumming, J.1
-
21
-
-
0031035698
-
Setting priorities New-Zealand-style: We can learn from it
-
Dixon J, New B. Setting priorities New-Zealand-style: we can learn from it. BMJ 1997; 314: 86-7.
-
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.314
, pp. 86-87
-
-
Dixon, J.1
New, B.2
-
22
-
-
0030894213
-
The rationing debate: Central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions: The case for
-
Lenagham J. The rationing debate: central government should have a greater role in rationing decisions: the case for. BMJ 1997; 314: 967-70.
-
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.314
, pp. 967-970
-
-
Lenagham, J.1
-
23
-
-
0032570216
-
Evidence-based rationing. Dutch pragmatism or government insensitivity?
-
MacLeod SM, Bienenstock J. Evidence-based rationing. Dutch pragmatism or government insensitivity? Can Med Assoc J 1998; 158: 213-4.
-
(1998)
Can Med Assoc J
, vol.158
, pp. 213-214
-
-
MacLeod, S.M.1
Bienenstock, J.2
-
24
-
-
0029941177
-
Setting priorities: Is there a role for citizens' juries?
-
Lenaghan J, New B, Mitchell E. Setting priorities: is there a role for citizens' juries? BMJ 1996; 312: 1591-3.
-
(1996)
BMJ
, vol.312
, pp. 1591-1593
-
-
Lenaghan, J.1
New, B.2
Mitchell, E.3
-
25
-
-
0033616378
-
Patients' priorities
-
Richards T. Patients' priorities. BMJ 1999; 318: 277.
-
(1999)
BMJ
, vol.318
, pp. 277
-
-
Richards, T.1
-
26
-
-
0025977542
-
The role of public values in setting health care priorities
-
Hadorn DC. The role of public values in setting health care priorities. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32: 773-81.
-
(1991)
Soc Sci Med
, vol.32
, pp. 773-781
-
-
Hadorn, D.C.1
-
27
-
-
0029161450
-
Rationing: The case for «muddling through elegantly»
-
Hunter DJ. Rationing: the case for «muddling through elegantly». BMJ 1995; 311: 811.
-
(1995)
BMJ
, vol.311
, pp. 811
-
-
Hunter, D.J.1
-
28
-
-
0032572318
-
Retracing the Oregon trail: The experience of rationing and the Oregon health plan
-
Ham C. Retracing the Oregon trail: the experience of rationing and the Oregon health plan. BMJ 1998; 316: 1965-9.
-
(1998)
BMJ
, vol.316
, pp. 1965-1969
-
-
Ham, C.1
-
29
-
-
0034628852
-
Hvor mye penger vil vi brake på helsevesenet?
-
Olsen JA, Hofoss D. Hvor mye penger vil vi brake på helsevesenet? Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 2000; 120: 779-82.
-
(2000)
Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen
, vol.120
, pp. 779-782
-
-
Olsen, J.A.1
Hofoss, D.2
-
30
-
-
0032580778
-
Health needs assessment. Whose priorities? Listening to users and the public
-
Jordan J, Dowswell T, Harrison S, Lilford RJ, Mort M. Health needs assessment. Whose priorities? Listening to users and the public. BMJ 1998; 316: 1668-70.
-
(1998)
BMJ
, vol.316
, pp. 1668-1670
-
-
Jordan, J.1
Dowswell, T.2
Harrison, S.3
Lilford, R.J.4
Mort, M.5
-
31
-
-
0033519057
-
Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: Focus group study
-
Dolan P, Cookson R, Ferguson B. Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group study. BMJ 1999; 318: 916-9.
-
(1999)
BMJ
, vol.318
, pp. 916-919
-
-
Dolan, P.1
Cookson, R.2
Ferguson, B.3
-
32
-
-
0030792140
-
Who should decide? Qualitative analysis of panel data from public, patients, healthcare professionals, and insurers on priorities in health care
-
Stronks K, Strijbis AM, Wendte JF, Gunning-Schepers LJ. Who should decide? Qualitative analysis of panel data from public, patients, healthcare professionals, and insurers on priorities in health care. BMJ 1997; 315: 92-6.
-
(1997)
BMJ
, vol.315
, pp. 92-96
-
-
Stronks, K.1
Strijbis, A.M.2
Wendte, J.F.3
Gunning-Schepers, L.J.4
-
33
-
-
0027181922
-
Health services priorities. Exploration in consultation of the public: And health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district
-
Bowling A, Jacobsen B, Southgate L. Health services priorities. Exploration in consultation of the public: and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district. Soc Sci Med 1993; 37: 851-7.
-
(1993)
Soc Sci Med
, vol.37
, pp. 851-857
-
-
Bowling, A.1
Jacobsen, B.2
Southgate, L.3
-
34
-
-
0028826340
-
Consulting the public about healthcare priorities
-
Bowie C, Richardson A, Sykes W. Consulting the public about healthcare priorities. BMJ 1995; 311: 1155-8.
-
(1995)
BMJ
, vol.311
, pp. 1155-1158
-
-
Bowie, C.1
Richardson, A.2
Sykes, W.3
-
35
-
-
0030514575
-
The public and professional interface with priority setting in the National Health Service
-
Wells J. The public and professional interface with priority setting in the National Health Service. Health Social Care Comm 1996; 4: 255-63.
-
(1996)
Health Social Care Comm
, vol.4
, pp. 255-263
-
-
Wells, J.1
-
36
-
-
0032505467
-
Puzzeling out priorities. Why we must acknowledge that rationing is a political process
-
Klein R. Puzzeling out priorities. Why we must acknowledge that rationing is a political process. BMJ 1998; 317: 959-60.
-
(1998)
BMJ
, vol.317
, pp. 959-960
-
-
Klein, R.1
-
37
-
-
0043220029
-
Utviklingen i norsk helsevesen og norsk helsepolitikk i lys av målsetningen om likhet
-
Botten G, Skaset M. Utviklingen i norsk helsevesen og norsk helsepolitikk i lys av målsetningen om likhet. Tidsskr for Velferdsforskning 1999; 2: 215-28.
-
(1999)
Tidsskr for Velferdsforskning
, vol.2
, pp. 215-228
-
-
Botten, G.1
Skaset, M.2
-
38
-
-
0041717471
-
Kjønnsulikheter i sykelighet og dødelighet. Ulike modeller som kan brakes til å forklare kvinners og menns forskjellig sykdomsbilde
-
Scher B, Botten G, Sundby J, red. Oslo: Ad Notam-Gyldendal
-
Botten G. Kjønnsulikheter i sykelighet og dødelighet. Ulike modeller som kan brakes til å forklare kvinners og menns forskjellig sykdomsbilde. I: Scher B, Botten G, Sundby J, red. Kvinnemedisin. Oslo: Ad Notam-Gyldendal, 1993: 42-60.
-
(1993)
Kvinnemedisin
, pp. 42-60
-
-
Botten, G.1
-
39
-
-
0005768015
-
-
NOU 1999: 13. Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste, Seksjon statens trykning
-
Norges offentlige utredninger. Kvinners helse i Norge. NOU 1999: 13. Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste, Seksjon statens trykning, 1999.
-
(1999)
Norges Offentlige Utredninger. Kvinners Helse i Norge
-
-
-
42
-
-
0025977542
-
The role of public values in setting health care priorities
-
Hadorn DC. The role of public values in setting health care priorities. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32: 773-81.
-
(1991)
Soc Sci Med
, vol.32
, pp. 773-781
-
-
Hadorn, D.C.1
-
43
-
-
0032580778
-
Health needs assessment. Whose priorities? Listening to users and the public
-
Jordan J, Dowswell T, Harrison S, Lilford R, Mort M. Health needs assessment. Whose priorities? Listening to users and the public. BMJ 1998; 316: 1668-70.
-
(1998)
BMJ
, vol.316
, pp. 1668-1670
-
-
Jordan, J.1
Dowswell, T.2
Harrison, S.3
Lilford, R.4
Mort, M.5
-
44
-
-
0028787148
-
Patient's views of priority setting in health care: An interview survey in one practice
-
Dicker A, Armstrong D. Patient's views of priority setting in health care: an interview survey in one practice. BMJ 1995; 311: 1137-9.
-
(1995)
BMJ
, vol.311
, pp. 1137-1139
-
-
Dicker, A.1
Armstrong, D.2
-
45
-
-
0042718839
-
Norges offentlige utredninger. Hvor nært skal del vasre?
-
Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste, Seksjon statens trykning, 1999
-
Norges offentlige utredninger. Hvor nært skal del vasre? NOU 15: 1999. Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste, Seksjon statens trykning, 1999.
-
(1999)
NOU
, vol.15
-
-
|