The large foetus - A retrospective study;Stort foster - En retrospektiv studie

Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening

Volumn 120, Issue 16, 2000, Pages 1848-1850

  Wojtasinska, Maria ^a   Belfrage, Patrick ^a   Gjessing, Leif ^a  

^a Sentralsjukehuset i Rogaland   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIRTH INJURY; DYSTOCIA; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FETUS WEIGHT; HUMAN; INJURY; LABOR INDUCTION; MACROSOMIA; MALE; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SHOULDER;

BIRTH INJURIES; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; FETAL MACROSOMIA; FETAL WEIGHT; HUMANS; LABOR PRESENTATION; LABOR, INDUCED; MALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, MULTIPLE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SHOULDER;

EID: 0034690928     PISSN: 00292001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Berard J, Dufour P, Vinatier D, Subtil D, Vanderstichele S, Monnier JC et al. Fetal macrosomi: risk factors and outcome. A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases > 4 500 g. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998; 77: 51-9.
2. Lipscomb K, Gregory K, Shaw K. The outcome of macrosomic infants weighing at least 4 500 grams: Los Angeles Country, University of Southern California Experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 85: 558-64.
3. Mikulandra F, Perisa M, Stoinic E. When is fetal macrosomia (≥4 500 g) an indication for cesarean section? Zentralbl Gynakol 1996; 118: 441-7.
4. Friesen C, Miller A, Rayburn W. Influence of spontaneous or induced labor on delivering the macrosomic fetus. Am J Perinatal 1995; 12: 63-5.
5. Menticoglou S, Manning F, Morrison I, Harman Ch. Must macrosomic fetuses be delivered by a cesarean section? A reviev of outcome for 786 babies ≥ 4 500 g. Aust J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 32: 100-3.
6. Gonen O, Rosen D, Dolfin Z, Tepper R, Markov Sh, Fejgin M. Induction of labor versus expectant management in macrosomia: a randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 913-7.
7. Combs CA, Singh N, Khoury J. Elective induction versus spontaneus labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynekol 1993; 81: 492-6.
8. Eik-Nes SH, Grøttun P, Andersson NJ. Estimation of fetal weight by ultrasound measurement. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982; 61: 307-12.
9. Marsal K, Persson P-H, Larsen T, Lelja H, Selbing A, Sultan B. Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights. Acta Pediatr 1996; 85: 843-8.
10. Bergsjø P, Maltau JM, Molne K, Nesheim B-J. Obstetrikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget 1993: 47.
11. Haram K, Bergsjø P, Tangvik RJ. Vekt og vektøkning hos gravide. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1997; 117: 3230-3.
12. Meeuwisse G, Otterblad-Olausson P. Allt större andel nyfödda väger över fyra kilo. Läkartidningen 1998; 95: 5488-92.
13. Nesbitt T, Gilbert W, Herrchen B. Shoulder dystocia and associated risk factors with macrosomic infants born in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 476-80.
14. Bahar AM. Risk factors and fetal outcome in cases of shoulder dystocia compared with normal deliveries of a similar birthweight. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 868-72.
15. Cohen B, Penning S, Major C, Ansley D, Porto M, Garite T. Sonographic prediction of shoulder dystocia in infants of diabetic mothers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 10-3.