Conformational studies by dynamic NMR. 74. Stereomutations of the conformational enantiomers in peri-substituted 1-acylnaphthalenes

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 65, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 3200-3206

  Lunazzi, Lodovico ^a   Mazzanti, Andrea ^a   Álvarez, Anna Muñoz ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NAPHTHALENE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHIRALITY; CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

EID: 0034685987     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo991853g     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. For part 73, see: Casarini, D.; Lunazzi, L.; Mazzanti, A.; Simon, G. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3207.
2. On leave of absence from the Unitat de Química Orgànica, Departement de Química, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
3. Cosmo, R.; Sternhell, S. Aust. J. Chem. 1987, 40, 1107.
4. (a) Cozzi, F.; Cinquini, M.; Annunziata, R.; Dwyer, T.; Siegel, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5729.
5. (b) Cozzi, F.; Cinquini, M.; Annunziata, R.; Siegel, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5330.
6. (c) Cozzi, F.; Ponzini, F.; Cinquini, M.; Annunziata, R.; Cinquini, M.; Siegel, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int.Ed. Eng. 1995, 34, 1019.
7. Nagawa, Y.; Honda, K.; Nakanishi, H. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1996, 34, 78.
8. (a) Zoltewicz, J. A.; Maier, N. M.; Fabian, W. M. F. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 8703.
9. (b) Zoltewicz, J. A.; Maier, N. M.; Fabian, W. M. F. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 7018.
10. (a) Clough, R. L.; Roberts, J. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 1018.
11. (b) Clough, R. L.; Kung, W. J.; Marsh, R. E.; Roberts, J. D. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 3603.
12. Staab, H. A.; Chi, C.-S.; Dabrowski, J. Tetrahedron 1982, 38, 3499.
13. Casarini, D.; Lunazzi, L.; Foresti, E.; Macciantelli, D. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4637.
14. Computer package PCMODEL, Serena Software, Bloomington, IN.
15. Casarini, D.; Davalli, S.; Lunazzi, L.; Macciantelli, D. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 4616.
16. (a) Casarini, D.; Lunazzi, L.; Verbeek, R. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 2471.
17. (b) Casarini, D.; Lunazzi, L. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 175.
18. (c) Jennings, W. B.; Kochanewycz, M. J. K.; Lunazzi, L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1997, 2271.
19. (d) Casarini, D.; Lunazzi, L.; Mazzanti, A.; Foresti, E. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 4991.
20. AB coupling constant.
21. 2) = -ΔG°/RT, with ΔG° assumed to be independent of temperature.
22. (a) von Ammon, R.; Fischer, R. D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1972, 11, 675.
23. (b) Cockerill, A. F.; Davies, G. L. O.; Harden, R. C.; Rackham, D. M. Chem. Rev. 1973, 73, 553.
24. (c) Reuben, J. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 1973, 9, 1.
25. (d) Hofer, O. Top. Stereochem. 1976, 9, 111.
26. (e) Peters, J. A. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 1996, 28, 283.
27. 15b
28. Cipiciani, A.; Linda, P.; Macciantelli, D.; Lunazzi, L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trant. 2 1979, 1045.
29. 3 is shifted toward the C=O⋯Yb dimer less than in 5b. Despite the consequent lower efficiency, the LIS effect experienced by the ethyl methyl signal is larger in 5a than in 5b, because in the diastereoisomer syn the C= O is closer to the Et group than in the diastereoisomer anti (the computed average distances between the carbonyl oxygen atom and the ethyl methyl hydrogens are 3.65 Å in 5a and 5.52 A in 5b).
30. Bott, G.; Field, L. D.; Sternhell, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 702, 5618.
31. -1).
32. -1, respectively, for the ethyl derivatives 6 and 2, for the isopropyl derivatives 7 and 3 and for the tert-butyl derivatives 8 and 4 (see Table 1).
33. Bailey, R. J.; Card, P. J.; Shechter, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 6103.
34. Thompson, W. J.; Gaudino, J. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 5237.
35. Miyaura, N.; Yanagi, T.; Suzuki, A. Synth. Commun. 1981, 11, 513.
36. QCPE program no. 633, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.