|
Volumn 355, Issue 9204, 2000, Pages 633-
|
Hong Kong debates where to draw the line with passive euthanasia.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CONFLICT;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
GROUP PROCESS;
HONG KONG;
HONG KONG MEDICAL COUNCIL;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL ASPECT;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PROFESSIONAL STANDARD;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
HONG KONG MEDICAL COUNCIL;
DISSENT AND DISPUTES;
ETHICS COMMITTEES, CLINICAL;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
GROUP PROCESSES;
HONG KONG;
HUMANS;
JUDICIAL ROLE;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 0034685087
PISSN: 01406736
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)72501-0 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (8)
|
References (0)
|