The limitations of evidence from randomized trials

CMAJ. Canadian Medical Association Journal

Volumn 163, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 986-987

  Magder, S ^a  

^a ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; HUMAN; NOTE; PATIENT SELECTION; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 0034680284     PISSN: 08203946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. A comparison of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure
2. Treatment of severe cardiogenic pulmonary edema with continuous positive airway pressure delivered by face mask
3. Randomised controlled trial of nasal ventilation in acute ventilatory failure due to chronic obstructive airways disease
4. Noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
5. Noninvasive pressure support ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure. A randomized comparison with conventional therapy
6. Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation: A utilization review of use in a teaching hospital