The practice of systematic reviews. VI. Searching, selection and methodological assessment of aetiological research;De praktijk van systematische reviews. VI. Zoeken, selecteren en methodologisch beoordelen van etiologisch onderzoek

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 144, Issue 25, 2000, Pages 1210-1214

  Van der Windt, D A W M ^a   Zeegers, M P A ^a   Kemper, H C G ^a   Assendelft, W J J ^a   Scholten, R J P M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PUBLICATION; REVIEW;

CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EVALUATION STUDIES; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE; SELECTION BIAS;

EID: 0034679205     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Het patient-controle-onderzoek
2. Selection of controls in case-control studies. II. Types of controls
3. De praktijk van systematische reviews. II. Zoeken en selecteren van literatuur
4. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews
5. Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound studies in MEDLINE
6. Dwalingen in de methodologie. XIII. Matching doorgaans niet zinvol
7. Influence of methodologic factors in a pooled analysis of 13 case-control studies of colorectal cancer and dietary fiber
8. Methodologic standards and contradictory results in case-control research
9. Physical load during work and leisure time as risk factors for back pain
10. Scand J Work Environ Health
11. De praktijk van systematische reviews. III. Methodologische beoordeling van onderzoeken
12. Dwalingen in de methodologie. XV. Rokende grootvaders en andere vertekeningen door selectie
13. Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies
14. De praktijk van systematische reviews. VII. Her combineren van de resultaten van observationele onderzoeken