Optimized two-dimensional NLO chromophores with a threefold symmetry exis

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 1436-1439

  Wolff, J Jens ^a   Siegler, Fred ^a   Matschiner, Ralf ^b   Wortmann, Rüdiger ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b Universität Kaiserslautern ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Chromophores; Donor acceptor systems; Electrochromism; Hyper Rayleigh scattering; Nonlinear optics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; POLYMERIZATION; STOICHIOMETRY; SYNTHESIS; TRANSPORT KINETICS;

EID: 0034678874     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(20000417)39:8<1436::AID-ANIE1436>3.0.CO;2-U     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. a) J. J. Wolff, R. Wortmann, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1999, 32, 121-217;
2. b) R. Wortmann, C. Glania, R. Krämer, J. J. Wolff, S. Kraft, B. Treptow, E. Barbu, D. Längle, G. Görlitz, Chem. Eur. J. 1997, 3, 1765-1773;
3. c) H. S. Nalwa, M. Hanack, G. Pawlowski, M. K. Engel, Chem. Phys. 1999, 245, 17-26;
4. d) E. Schmälzlin, U. Bitterer, H. Langhals, C. Bräuchle, K. Meerholz, Chem. Phys. 1999, 245, 73-78;
5. e) C. Andraud, T. Zabulon, A. Collet, J. Zyss, Chem. Phys. 1999, 245, 243-261;
6. f) C. Lambert, E. Schmälzlin, K. Meerholz, C. Bräuchle, Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 512-521;
7. g) C. Lambert, G. Nöll, H. Schmälzlin, K. Meerholz, C. Bräuchle, Chem. Eur. J. 1998, 4, 2129-2135;
8. h) Y.-K. Lee, S.-J. Jeon, M. Cho, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10921-10927.
9. a) M. Joffre, D. Yaron, R. J. Silbey, J. Zyss, J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 5607-5615;
10. b) J. Zyss, I. Ledoux, Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 77-105.
11. a) I. Ledoux, J. Zyss, J. Siegel, J. Brienne, J.-M. Lehn, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 172, 440-444;
12. b) I. G. Voigt-Martin, G. Li, A. Yakimanski, G. Schulz, J. J. Wolff, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 1996, 118, 12830-12381.
13. P. Kaatz, D. P. Shelton, J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 3918-3929.
14. a) S. Stadler, F. Feiner, C. Bräuchle, S. Brandl, R. Gompper, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 245, 292-296;
15. b) S. Stadler, C. Bräuchle, S. Brandl, R. Gompper, Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 414-417;
16. c) C. Lambert, W. Gaschler, E. Schmälzlin, K. Meerholz, C. Bräuchle, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 1999, 577-587. The best 2D derivative obtained so far was a tris(tricyanovinyl)-substituted triphenylamine described in this paper. However, due to the strong steric hindrance in triphenylamines, the nondipolar 2D derivative only shows a relative activity of around 0.6 with respect to the 1D analogue, which comes relatively close to the theoretical value of 0.75 for the addition of three independent components.
17. [1b]
18. [1b]
19. B. F. Levine, C. G. Bethea, J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 66, 2666-2682.
20. I. D. Morrison, R. G. Denning, W. M. Laidlaw, M. A. Stammers, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1996, 67, 1445-1453.
21. a) W. Liptay, Angew. Chem. 1969, 81, 195-206; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8, 177-188;
22. a) W. Liptay, Angew. Chem. 1969, 81, 195-206; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1969, 8, 177-188;
23. b) R. Wortmann, K. Elich, S. Lebus, W. Liptay, P. Borowicz, A. Grabowska, J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 9724-9730. With this method the change of the molar decadic absorption coefficient for two polarization positions and for several wavenumbers in the region of the absorption is measured.
24. a) J.-L. Oudar, D.S . Chemla, J., Chem. Phys. 1977, 66, 2664-2668;
25. b) J.-L. Oudar, J. Chem. Phys. 1977, 67, 446-457;
26. c) R. Wortmann, P. Krämer, C. Glania, S. Lebus, N. Detzer, Chem. Phys. 1993, 173, 99-108;
27. d) J. J. Wolff, D. Längle, D. Hillenbrand, R. Wortmann, R. Matschiner, C. Glania, P. Krämer. Adv. Mater. 1997, 9, 138-143.
28. 122(0) is obtained from Equation (2). (formula presented)
29. A. Willets, J. E. Rice, D. M. Burland, D. P. Shelton, J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 97, 7590-7599.
30. K. Wallenfels, F. Witzler, K. Friedrich, Tetrahedron 1967, 23, 1845-1855; the last two steps were combined to a single-step procedure in analogy to: G. A. Olah, T. Keumi, Synthesis 1979, 112-113.
31. K. Wallenfels, F. Witzler, K. Friedrich, Tetrahedron 1967, 23, 1845- 1855; the last two steps were combined to a single-step procedure in analogy to: G. A. Olah, T. Keumi, Synthesis 1979, 112-113.
32. In analogy to a modified Stille reaction: S. Gronowitz, P. Bj̈ork, J. Malm, A.-B. Hörnfeldt, J. Organoment. Chem. 1993, 460, 127-129.
33. In analogy to the reaction with phenyltri-tert-butyltin: H.-J. Götze, Chem. Ber. 1972, 105, 1775-1777.
34. A. Samtleben, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1898, 31, 1141-1148.
35. E. Kober, C. Grundmann, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 3769-3770.
36. S. Takahashi, Y. Kuroyama, K. Sonogashira, N. Hagihara, Synthesis 1980, 627-630.
37. In analogy to the reaction with dimethylaminophenyltributyltin: V. Farina, B. Krishnan, D. R. Marshall, G. P. Roth, J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 5434-5444.