Landscapes, tourism, and conservation

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 249, Issue 1-3, 2000, Pages 39-49

  Burger, Joanna ^a  

^a GE Life Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Contaminated lands; Ecotourism; Global change; Recreation; Riparian; Shorebirds; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ECOTOURISM; GLOBAL CHANGE; LANDSCAPE;

BIODIVERSITY; CONTAMINATION; ECOSYSTEM; LANDSCAPING; PRESERVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTECTION; RECREATION; REVIEW; TOURISM; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

UNITED STATES;

RIPARIA;

EID: 0034678782     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00509-4     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bartell SM, Campbell KR, Lewis CJ, Burger J. Assessing ecological risks at US Department of Energy facilities using methods borrowed from landscape ecology and habitat suitability analysis. I. Analysis of historical aerial photography and maps. Int J Environ Pollut, 2000.
2. Bengtsson J., Jones H., Setala H. The value of biodiversity. TREE. 12:1997;334-336.
3. Bentley J.C., Catterall C.P. The use of bushland, corridors, and linear remnants by birds in southeastern Queensland, Australia. Biol Conserv. 11:1996;1173-1189.
4. Bishop M.A., Warnock N. Migration of western sandpipers: links between their Alaskan stopover areas and breeding grounds. Wilson Bull. 110:1998;457-462.
5. Botton M.L., Loveland R.E., Jacobsen T.R. Site selection by migratory shorebirds in Delaware Bay, and its relationship to beach characteristics and abundance of horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) eggs. Auk. 111:1994;605-616.
6. Burger J. Environmental attitudes and perceptions of future land use at the Savannah River Site: are there racial differences? J Toxicol Environ Health. 53:1998;255-262.
7. Burger J. Ecological risk assessment at the Department of Energy: an evolving process. Int J Toxicol. 18:1999;149-155.
8. Burger J. Recreation, consumption of wild game, risk, and the Department of Energy sites: perceptions of people attending the Lewiston (Idaho) 'Roundup'. J Toxicol Environ Health. 56:1999;101-114.
9. Burger J., Gochfeld M. Twenty-five nature spectacles in New Jersey. 2000;Rutgers University Press, Piscataway, New Jersey.
10. Burger J, Olla B, editors. Behavior of marine animals, vol. 6. Shorebirds: migration and foraging behavior. New York: Plenum Press, 1984.
11. Burger J., Niles L., Clark K.E. Importance of beach, mudflat and marsh habitats to migrant shorebirds on Delaware Bay. Biol Conserv. 79:1997;283-292.
12. Burger J., Sanchez J., Gibbons J.W., Gochfeld M. Risk perception, federal spending, and the Savannah River Site: attitudes of hunters and fishermen. Risk Anal. 17:1997;313-320.
13. Burger J., Sanchez J., Gibbons J.W., Gochfeld M. Gender Differences in Recreational use, environmental attitudes and perceptions of future land use at Savannah River Site. Environ Behav. 30:1998;472-486.
14. Burger J, Roush DE Jr, Sanchez J et al. Attitudes and perceptions about ecological resources, hazards, and future land use of people living near the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. Environ Monit Assess, in press a.
15. Burger J, Roush D, Gochfeld, M. Risk perception, land use, and the Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory: attitudes of the Shoshone-Bannock and other American Indians. Environ Res, in press b.
16. Clark K., Niles L., Burger J. Abundance and distribution of shorebirds migrating on Delaware Bay, 1986-1992. Condor. 95:1993;694-705.
17. Cordell H.K., Herbert N.G., Pandolfi F. The growing popularity of birding in the United States. Birding. 31:1999;168-176.
18. Dale V.H., Parr P.D. Preserving DOE's Research Parks. Issues Sci Technol. 282:1997;616-617.
19. National environmental research parks. 1994;Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
20. Closing the circle on the splitting of the atom. 1996;Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
21. Department of Energy (DOE). Charting the course: the future use report. Washington, DC: Department of Energy (DOE/EM-0283), 1996.
22. Downes S.J., Handasyde K.A., Elgar M.A. The use of corridors by mammals in fragmented Australian Eucalypt forests. Conserv Biol. 11:1997;718-726.
23. Fahrig L., Merriam G. Conservation of fragmented populations. Conserv Biol. 8:1994;50-59.
24. Farmer A.H., Parent A.H. Effects of the landscape on shorebird movement at spring migration stopovers. Condor. 99:1997;698-707.
25. Forman R.T.T., Godron M. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. Bioscience. 31:1981;733-739.
26. Gale R.J.P. Environment and development: attitudinal impediments to policy integration. Environ Conserv. 18:1991;228-236.
27. Haeuber R. Setting the environmental policy agenda: the case of ecosystem management. Natl Res J. 36:1996;1-27.
28. Haig S.M., Mehlman D.W., Oring L.W. Avian movements and wetland connectivity in landscape conservation. Conserv Biol. 12:1998;749-758.
29. Hess G.R. Conservation corridors and contagious disease: a cautionary note. Conserv Biol. 8:1994;256-262.
30. Kattan G.H., Alvarez-Lopez H., Giraldo M. Forest fragmentation and bird extinctions: San Antonio eighty years later. Conserv Biol. 8:1994;138-146.
31. Lemly A.D. Risk assessment in the regulatory process for wetlands. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 35:1996;41-56.
32. Levin S.A. Orchestrating environmental research and assessment. Ecol Appl. 2:1992;103-106.
33. Lucero G.A. Cleanup of old waste: some thoughts on rethinking the fundamentals of Superfund. Risk Anal. 11:1991;63-67.
34. Myers J.P., Morrison R.I.G., Antas P.A. et al. Conservation strategy for migratory species. Am Sci. 75:1987;18-26.
35. National Park Service. Annual visitors to United States National Parks. http//www2nature.nps.gov/stat/summary master.htm, 1999.
36. Nehlsen W., Williams J.E., Lichatowich J.A. Pacific Salmon at the crossroads: stocks at risk from California, Oregon, Idaho, and Washington. Fisheries. 16:1991;4-21.
37. Pettigrew L. New Jersey: wildlife viewing guide. 1998;Falcon Press, Helena, Montana.
38. Piersma T. Phenotypic flexibility during migration: optimization of organ size contingent on the risks and rewards of fueling and flight? J Avian Biol. 29:1998;511-521.
39. Sanchez J, Burger J. Hunting and exposure: estimating risk and future use at nuclear production sites. Risk Health Saf Environ, Spring 1998:109-118.
40. Skagen S.K., Melcher C.P., Howe W.H., Knopf F.L. Comparative use of riparian corridors and oases by migrating birds in southeast Arizona. Conserv Biol. 12:1998;896-909.
41. Solitare L, Lowrie K, Greenberg M, Frisch M, Noah C, Burger J. Enhanced recreational opportunities at US DOE sites: economic evaluation of an alternative land use scenario at Savannah River Site. Fed Fac Environ J, in press.
42. Tsipoura N., Burger J. Shorebird diet during spring migration stopover on Delaware Bay. Condor. 10:1999;635-644.
43. Tracy C.R., Brussard P.F. Preserving biodiversity: species in landscapes. Ecol Appl. 4:1994;205-207.
44. Villard M.A., Martin P.R., Drummond C.G. Habitat fragmentation and pairing success in the ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapillus). Auk. 110:1993;759-768.