Polemic or controversial therapies in the neurodevelop mental disorders;Terapias de controversia o polémicas en los trastornos del neurodesarrollo

Revista de Neurologia

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 368-375

  Calderon Gonzalez R ^a  

^a NONE   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Alternative therapy; Attention deficit disorder; Autism; Controversial therapy; Learning disorders; Neurodevelopment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN; CHILD; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; HUMAN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BRAIN; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; HUMANS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034674852     PISSN: 02100010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.33588/rn.3104.2000251     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Worrall RS. Detecting health fraud in the field of learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 1990; 23: 107-19.
2. Worral RS. Detecting health fraud in the field of learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 1990; 23: 207-12.
3. Silver LB. The 'magic cure': a review of the current controversial approaches for treating learning disabilities. J Learn Disabil 1987; 20: 498-504.
4. Sabbagh K. The psychopathology of fringe medicine. The Skeptical Inquirer 1985 (winter); 154-64.
5. Brown GW. Controversial therapy. In Gottlieb MI, Williams JE, eds. Textbook of developmental pediatrics. New York: Plenum Med Book; 1987. p. 431-50.
6. Fontanarosa PB, Lundberg GD. Alternative medicine meets science. JAMA 1998; 328: 246-52.
7. American Academy of Neurology and American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Assessment of digital EEG, quantitative EEC, and EEG brain mapping. Neurology 1997; 49: 277-92.
8. Silver LB. Controversial therapies. J Child Neurol 1995; 10 (Suppl 1): S96-100.