Texture luminance judgments are approximately veridical

Vision Research

Volumn 40, Issue 13, 2000, Pages 1695-1709

  Nam, Jong Ho ^a   Chubb, Charles ^b  

^a The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Brightness; Histogram contrast analysis; Texture

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LIGHT; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0034674361     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00006-7     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Barlow H.B. Optic nerve impulses and Weber's law. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantum Biology. 30:1965;539-546.
2. Barlow H.B., Levick W.R. Three factors limiting the reliable detection of light by retinal ganglion cells of the cat. Journal of Physiology. 200:1969;1-24.
3. Chubb C. Texture-based methods for analyzing elementary visual substances. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 43:1999;539-567.
4. Chubb C., Econopouly J., Landy M.S. Histogram contrast analysis and the visual segregation of IID textures. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 11(9):1994;2350-2374.
5. Falmagne J-C. The generalized Fechner problem and discrimination. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 8:1971;22-43.
6. Fechner, G.T. (1860). Elements of Psychophysics, In D.H. Howes and E.C. Boring (eds.), H.E. Adler, trans., Holt, Reinhardt & Winston, New York, 1966 (originally published, 1860).
7. Grossberg S., Todorovic D. Neural dynamics of 1-D and 2-D brightness perception: a unified model of classical and recent phenomena. Perception & Psychophysics. 43:1988;241-277.
8. He S., MacLeod D.I.A. Local luminance nonlinearity and receptor aliasing in the detection of high frequency gratings. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 13:1996;1139-1151.
9. He S., MacLeod D.I.A. Contrast modulation flicker: dynamics and spatial resolution of the light adaptation process. Vision Res. 38(7):1998;985-1000.
10. Lennie, P. (1993). Roles of M and P pathways in contrast sensitivity. In R. Shapley and D. M.-K. Lam (Eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 201-213.
11. Luce R.D., Edwards W. The derivation of subjective scales from just noticeable differences. Psychological Review. 65:1958;222-237.
12. MacLeod D.I.A., He S. Visible flicker from invisible patterns. Nature. 361:1993;256-258.
13. Makous W.L. Fourier models and the loci of adaptation. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 14:1997;2323-2345.
14. Maxwell J.C. On the theory of compound colors and the relation of the colors of the spectrum. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 150:1860;57-84.
15. Shapley R., Enroth-Cugell C. Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls. Prog. Retinal Res. 3:1984;263-346.
16. Stevens J.C., Stevens S.S. Brightness function: effects of adaptation. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 53:1963;375-385.
17. Stevens S.S. To honor Fechner and repeal his law. Science. 133:1961;80-86.
18. Stevens S.S. The surprising simplicity of sensory metrics. American Psychologist. 17:1962;29-39.
19. Stevens S.S. Intensity functions in sensory systems. International Journal of Neurology. 6:1967;202-209.
20. Yang J., Makous W.L. Modeling pedestal experiments with amplitude instead of contrast. Vision Research. 35:1995;1979-1989.