Force spectroscopy of molecular systems - Single molecule spectroscopy of polymers and biomolecules

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 39, Issue 18, 2000, Pages 3212-3237

  Janshoff, Andreas ^a   Neitzert, Marcus ^a   Oberdörfer, York ^a   Fuchs, Harald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

DNA recognition; Force spectroscopy; Polymers; Scanning probe methods

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; POLYMER;

ACCURACY; CALORIMETRY; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; DYNAMICS; ELASTICITY; ELECTRICITY; ENTHALPY; ENZYME MECHANISM; GENE REPLICATION; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; MEASUREMENT; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; MOLECULE; NEUROTRANSMISSION; REVIEW; SCANNING FORCE MICROSCOPY; SCINTISCANNING; SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 0034665438     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20000915)39:18<3212::aid-anie3212>3.0.co;2-x     Document Type: Review

References (159)

1. J. N. Israelachvili, D. Tabor, Proc. R. Soc. London A 1972, 331, 19.
2. G. Binnig, C. F. Quate, C. Gerber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 56, 930.
3. a) D. Krüger, B. Anczykowski, H. Fuchs, Ann. Phys. 1997, 6, 341;
4. b) B. Anczykowski, B. Gotsmann, J. P. Cleveland, H. Fuchs, V. B. Elings, Appl. Surf. Sci. 1999, 140, 376;
5. c) B. Golsmann, C. Seidel, B. Anczykowski, H. Fuchs, Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60, 11051;
6. d) B. Gotsmann, C. Schmidt, C. Seidel, H. Fuchs, Eur. Phys. J. B 1998, 4, 267.
7. E.-L. Florin, V. T. Moy, H. E. Gaub, Science 1994, 264, 415.
8. G. U. Lee, D. A. Kidwell, R. J. Colton, Langmuir 1994, 10, 354.
9. "Kraftspektroskopie an einzelnen Molekülen": M. Rief, Dissertation, Munich, 1997.
10. H. Heinzelmann, E. Meier, H. Rudin, H.-J. Güntherodt, Force Microscopy in scanning tunneling microscopy and related methods (Ed.: R. J. Behm), Kluwer-Academic, Amsterdam, 1990.
11. M. Radmacher, R. W. Tillman, M. Fritz, H. E. Gaub, Science 1992, 257, 1900.
12. H. G. Hansma, J. H. Hoh, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1994, 23, 115.
13. B. Capella, P. Baschieri, C. Frediani, P. Miccoli, C. Ascoli, IEE Eng. Med. Bio. 1997, March/April, 58.
14. J. H. Hoh, J. P. Cleveland, C. B. Prater, J.-P. Revel, P. K. Hansma, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4917.
15. R. Ros, F. Schwesinger, D. Anselmetti, M. Kubon, R. Schäfer, A. Plückthun, L. Tiefenauer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 7402.
16. C. D. Frisbie, L. F. Rozsnyai, A. Noy, M. S. Wrighton, C. M. Lieber, Science 1994, 265, 2071.
17. S. Akari, D. Horn, H. Keller, W. Schrepp, Adv. Mater. 1995, 7, 540.
18. C. E. H. Berger, K. O. van der Werf, R. P. H. Kooyman, B. G. de Grooth, J. Greve, Langmuir 1995, 11, 4128.
19. J. L. Wilbur, H. A. Biebuck, J. C. MacDonald, G. M. Whitesides, Langmuir 1995, 11, 825.
20. M. Ludwig, W. Dettmann, H. E. Gaub, Biophys. J. 1997, 72, 445.
21. G. Bar, S. Rubin, A. N. Parikh, B. I. Swanson, T. A. Zawodzinski, Jr., M.-H. Whangho, Langmuir 1997, 13, 373.
22. E. W. van der Vegte, G. Hadziiannou, J. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 9563.
23. J. N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 2nd ed., Academic Press, London, 1991.
24. H.-J. Butt, Biophys. J. 1991, 60, 777.
25. W. A. Ducker, T. J. Senden, R. M. Pashley, Nature 1991, 353, 239.
26. A. Marti, G. Hähner, N. D. Spencer, Langmuir 1995, 11, 4632.
27. G. U. Lee, L. A. Chrisey, R. J. Colton, Science 1994, 266, 771.
28. T. Boland, B. D. Ratner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 5297.
29. L. A. Wenzler, G. L. Moyes, L. G. Olson, J. M. Harris, T. P. Beebe, Jr., Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 2855.
30. P. Hinterdorfer, W. Baumgartner, H. J. Gruber, K. Schilcher, H. Schindler, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 3477.
31. L. A. Wenzler, G. L. Moyes, G. N. Raikar, R. L. Hansen, J. M. Harris, T. P. Beebe, Jr., Langmuir 1997, 13, 3761.
32. K. Mitsui, M. Hara, A. Ikai, FEBS Lett. 1996, 385, 29.
33. J. Fritz, D. Anselmetti, J. Jarchow, X. Fernandez-Busquets, J. Struct. Biol. 1997, 119, 165.
34. M. Heuberger, G. Dietler, L. Schlapbach, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B. 1996, 14, 1250.
35. A. Vinckier, P. Gervasoni, F. Zaugg, U. Ziegler, P. Lindner, P. Groscurth, A. Plückthun, G. Semenza, Biophys. J. 1998, 74, 1.
36. p < 0, if the piezo device moves towards the cantilever.
37. J. B. Pethica, A. P. Sutton, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1988, 6, 2400.
38. On a microscopic level, repulsion is a matter of overlapping wavefunctions of the tip and the sample according to Pauli's rule. Macroscopically, elastic restoring forces determine the behavior in this regime.
39. 4 or silicon oxide, which exhibit very high elastic modules (> 150 Gpa). For critical applications diamond cantilevers are available.
40. N. A. Burnham, R. J. Colton, Force Microscopy in Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Spectroscopy (Ed.: D. A. Bonnell), VCH, Weinheim, 1993, p. 191.
41. M. Mate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68, 3323.
42. M. Radmacher, M. Fritz, C. M. Kacher, J. P. Cleveland, P. K. Hansma, Biophys. J. 1996, 70, 556.
43. S. R. Cohen, G. Neubauer, G. M. McClelland, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 1990, 8, 3449.
44. B. Bhushan, V. N. Koinkar, Appl. Phys. 1994, 64, 1653.
45. D. Krüger, B. Anczykowski, H. Fuchs, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 1997, 6, 341.
46. J. L. Hutter, J. Bechhoefer, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1993, 64, 1868.
47. Along this line the slope is - 1 and Δd = 0. Since the tip-sample distance does not change one sets d = 0 along the contact line.
48. M. Rief, F. Oesterhelt, B. Heymann, H. E. Gaub, Science 1997, 275, 1295-1297.
49. The tip and sample are made of the same material.
50. [3]
51. W. Mönch, G. Ertl, Semiconductor surfaces and interfaces, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 1995.
52. 2 fit. Electrostatic forces would cause a slower decrease (∞ 1/d).
53. H. W. Hao, A. M. Baró, J. J. Saenz, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 1991, 9, 1323.
54. -20 J.
55. R. J. Hunter, Foundations of Colloid Science. Vol. 1, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
56. H.-J. Butt, E. K. Wolf, S. A. C. Gould, B. D. Northern, C. M. Peterson, P. K. Hansma, J. Struct. Biol. 1990, 105, 54.
57. A. W. Adamson, Physical Chemistry of Surfaces, 5th ed., Wiley, New York, 1990.
58. A. L. Weisenhorn, P. Maivald, H.-J. Butt, P. K. Hansma, Phys. Rev. B 1992, 45, 45.
59. P. Kékicheff, S. Marcelja, T. J. Senden, V. E. Shubin, J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 6098.
60. T. J. Senden, C. J. Drummond, P. Kékicheff, Langmuir 1994, 10, 358.
61. T. J. Senden, C. J. Drummond, Colloids Surf. A 1995, 94, 29.
62. A. Marti, G. Hähner, N. D. Spencer, Langmuir 1995, 11, 4632.
63. X.-Y. Lin, F. Creuzet, H. Arribart, J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 97, 7272.
64. Not only the dissolved ions but also the water dipoles screen the electrical field.
65. V. A. Parsegian, D. Gingell, Biophys. J. 1972, 12, 1192.
66. Double-layer repulsion belongs to the electrostatic forces.
67. At low distances repulsive forces arising from the finite size of the solvent molecule occur. They are called structural or solvation forces.
68. J. Gregory, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1975, 51, 44.
69. D. McCormack, S. L. Carnie, D. Y. Chan, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1995, 169, 177.
70. H.-J. Butt, Biophys. J. 1992, 63, 578.
71. "Kraftspektroskopie: Von der van-der-Waals-Wechselwirkung zur Mechanik von Einzelmolekülen": M. Neitzert, Dissertation, Münster, 1999.
72. H.-J. Butt, Biophys. J. 1991, 60, 1438.
73. A. Noy, D. V. Vezcnov, C. M. Lieber, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1997, 27, 381-421.
74. B. Capella, G. Dietler, Surf. Sci. Rep. 1999, 34, 1.
75. H. Hertz, J. Reine Angew. Math. 1881, 92, 156.
76. K. L. Johnson, K. Kendall, A. D. Roberts, Proc. R. Soc. London A 1971, 324, 301.
77. B. V. Derjaguin, V. M. Muller, Y. P. Toporov, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1975, 53, 314.
78. a) V. M. Muller, V. S. Yushenko, B. V. Derjaguin, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1980, 77, 91;
79. b) B. D. Hughes, L. R. White Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 1979, 32, 445.
80. ST impossible.
81. a) H. Grubmüller, B. Heymann. P. Tavan, Science 1996, 271, 997;
82. b) B. Heymann, H. Grubmüller, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 303, 1.
83. E. Evans, K. Ritchie, Biophys. J. 1997, 72, 1541.
84. T. Han, J. M. Williams, T. P. Beebe, Jr., Anal. Chim. Acta 1995, 307, 365.
85. G. I. Bell, Science 1978, 200, 618.
86. G. U. Lee, L. A. Chrisey, R. J. Colton, Science 1994, 266, 771.
87. A. Noy, D. V. Vezenov, J. F. Kayyem, T. J. Meade, C. Lieber, Chem. Biol. 1997, 4, 519.
88. T. Boland, B. D. Ratner, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 5297.
89. E.-L. Florin, M. Rief, H. Lehmann, M. Ludwig, C. Dornmair, V. T. Moy, H. E. Gaub, Biosens. Bioelectron. 1995, 10, 895.
90. M. Rief, H. Clausen-Schaumann, H. E. Gaub, Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 6, 346.
91. B. Essevaz-Roulez, U. Bockelmann, F. Heslot, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 11935.
92. T. Strunz, K. Oroszlan, R. Schäfer, H. J. Güntherodt, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 11277.
93. U. Bockelmann, B. Essevaz-Roulet, F. Heslot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 79, 4489.
94. U. Bockelmann, B. Essevaz-Roulet, F. Heslot, Phys. Rev. E 1998, 58, 2386.
95. K. J. Breslauer, R. Frank, H. Blöcker, L. A. Marty, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 3746.
96. R. McKendry, M. E. Theoclitou, T. Rayment, C. Abell, Nature 1998, 391, 566.
97. J. Fritz, A. G. Katopodis, D. Anselmetti, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 12283.
98. M. Ludwig, V. T. Moy, M. Rief, E.-L. Florin, H. E. Gaub, Microsc. Microanal. Microstruct. 1994, 5, 321.
99. [96] measured the value as F = 280 pN. This example illustrates that the binding strength is a matter of external conditions such as the pulling speed of the cantilever.
100. U. Dammer, M. Hegner, D. Anselmetti, P. Wagner, M. Dreier, W. Huber, H.-J. Güntherodt, Biopys. J. 1996, 70, 2437.
101. V. T. Moy, E. L. Florin, H. E. Gaub, Colloids Surf. 1994, 93, 343.
102. "Kraftspektroskopie an Antikörper-Antigen-Systemen am Beispiel des Hb-A1c-Antikörpers": Y. Oberdörfer, Diplomarbeit, Münster, 1999.
103. M. Grandbois, M. Beyer, M. Rief, H. Clausen-Schaumann, H. E. Gaub, Science 1999, 283, 1727.
104. H. Li, M. Rief, F. Oesterhelt, H. E. Gaub, Adv. Mater. 1998, 3, 316.
105. F. Oesterhelt, M. Rief, H. E. Gaub, New J. Phys. 1999, 1, 6.1.
106. In this section, attractive forces have positive values following the standard set in the literature.
107. R. H. Austin, J. P. Brody, E. C. Cox, T. Duke, W. Volkmuth, Phys. Today 1997, 50, 32.
108. L. R. G. Treloar, The Physics of Rubber Elasticity, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1975.
109. C. Bouchiat, M. D. Wang, J.-F. Allemand, T. Strick, S. M. Block, V. Croquette, Biophys. J. 1999, 76, 409.
110. J. F. Marko, E. D. Siggia, Macromolecules 1995, 28, 8759.
111. P. Cluzel, A. Lebrun, C. Heller, R. Lavery, J.-L. Viovy, D. Chatenay, F. Caron, Science 1996, 271, 792.
112. T. Odijk, Macromolecules 1995, 28, 7016.
113. S. B. Smith, Y. Cui, C. Bustamante, Science 1999, 271, 795.
114. M. Rief, J. M. Fernandez, H. E. Gaub, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1998, 81, 4764.
115. P. E. Marszalek, A. F. Oberhauser, Y.-P. Pang, J. M. Fernandez, Nature 1998, 396, 661.
116. H. J. Kreuzer, R. L. C. Wang, M. Grunze, New J. Phys. 1999, 1, 21.1
117. P. J. Flory, Statistical Mechanics of Chain Molecules, Hanser, München, 1988.
118. G. Strobl, The Physics of Polymers, 2nd ed., Springer, Berlin, 1997.
119. M. Doi, S. F. Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.
120. L. Harnau, P. Reineker, New J. Phys. 1999, 1, 3.1.
121. C. Ortiz, G. Hadziioannou, Macromolecules 1999, 32, 780.
122. H. Jensenius, G. Zocchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 79, 5030.
123. S. Chandrasekhar, Rev. Mod. Phys. 1943, 15, 1.
124. → points into a given volume element.
125. H.-G. Elias, An Introduction to Polymer Science, 1st ed., VCH, Weinheim, 1997.
126. It is also conceivable that upon retraction of the cantilever the polymer becomes compressed, like tying a knot if the polymer is appropriately entangled.
127. This is similar to the description of the paramagnetism or orientation of a dipole in an electrical field.
128. Usually the extension x(F) is plotted versus the force F and Equation (12) fitted to the experimental data.
129. Equation (12) depicts an exact solution, while Equation (13) is an approximation for large values of n, which occurs in a common experiment. It is noteworthy that usually the distance x is varied and the force F measured. This procedure corresponds to Equation (13). The latest instruments permit the application of a particular force by magnetic cantilevers (A. Schemmel, H. E. Gaub, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1999, 70, 1313).
130. B T or x ≪ L, then Equation (13) (FJC model) can be simplified to Equation (11), the GC model.
131. T. J. Senden, J.-M. di Meglio, P. Auroy, Eur. Phys. J. B 1998, 3, 211.
132. J. Fritz, A. G. Katopodis, F. Kolbinger, D. Anselmetti, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 12283.
133. H. Kikuchi, N. Yokoyama, T. Kajiyama, Chem. Lett. 1997, 11, 1107.
134. H. Li, W. Zhang, X. Zhang, J. Shen, B. Liu, C. Gao, G. Zou, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 1998, 19, 609.
135. O. Kratky, G. Porod, Recl. Trav. Chim. 1949, 68, 1106.
136. C. G. Baumann, S. B. Smith, V. A. Bloomfield, C. Bustamante, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 6185-6190.
137. J. Kovac, C. G. Crabb, Macromolecules 1982, 15, 537.
138. C. Bustamante, J. F. Marko, E. D. Siggia, S. B. Smith, Science 1994, 265, 1599.
139. 4Y.
140. S. B. Smith, L. Finzi, C. Bustamante, Science 1992, 258, 1122.
141. C. Bouchiat, M. D. Wang, J.-F. Allemand, T. Strick, S. M. Block, V. Croquette, Biophys. J. 1999, 76, 409.
142. M. Rief, M. Gautel, A. Schemmel, H. E. Gaub, Biophys. J. 1998, 75, 3008.
143. M. Rief, J. Pascual, M. Saraste, H. E. Gaub, J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 286, 553.
144. P.
145. The specific stiffness Φ has the unit of a force and can be derived from the spring constant of the entire chain: K = Φ/L. This approach is analogous to K = κ/n in the case of the FJC model. Like the segment elasticity κ, Φ is also independent of the contour length. The relationship between κ and Φ is: Φ = κ/(n/L). The number of segments per length n/L is identical for all polymers of the same kind.
146. M. D. Wang, H. Yin, R. Landick, J. Gelles, S. M. Block, Biophys. J. 1997, 72, 1335.
147. The evaluation of Equation (16) in the form of the polynomial (left side) - (right side) = 0 is cumbersome, since only one of three possible solutions for F is useful.
148. H. Li, M. Rief, F. Oesterhelt, H. E. Gaub, X. Zhang, J. Shen, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 305, 197.
149. a) A. Ashkin; J. M. Dziedzic, J. E. Bjorkholm, S. Chu, Opt. Lett. 1986, 11, 288;
150. b) E.-L. Florin, A. Pralle, J. K. H. Hörber, E. H. K. Stelzer, J. Struct. Biol. 1997, 119, 202.
151. J. F. Léger, G. Romano, A. Sarkar, J. Robert, L. Bourdieu, D. Chatenay, J. F. Marko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 83, 1066.
152. M. W. Konrad, J. I. Bolonick, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 10989.
153. K. Kitamura, M. Tokunaga, A. H. Iwane, T. Yanagida, Nature 1999, 397, 129.
154. U. Dammer, O. Popescu, P. Wagner, D. Anselmetti, H.-J. Güntherodt, G. M. Misevic, Science 1996, 267, 1173.
155. D. Müller, Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Biophysik, Ulm, 1999.
156. M. Benoit, D. Gabriel, G. Gerisch, H. E. Gaub, Nature Cell Biol. 2000, 2, 313.
157. O. H. Willemsen, M. M. E. Snel, K. O. van der Werf, B. G. deGrooth, J. Greve, P. Hinterdorfer, H. J. Gruber, H. Schindler, Y. van Kooyk, C. G. Figdor, Biophys. J. 1998, 75, 2220.
158. M. Rief, M. Gautel, F. Oesterhelt, J. M. Fernandez, H. E. Gaub, Science 1997, 276, 1109.
159. A. F. Oberhauser, P. E. Marszalek, H. P. Erickson, J. M. Fernandez, Nature 1998, 339, 181.