메뉴 건너뛰기
Spine
Volumn 25, Issue 18, 2000, Pages 2277-2279
Peer review: Quality improvement at its best

(1)  Weinstein, J N a  

a NONE
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RESEARCH; REVIEW; SPINE;
EID: 0034665375     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200009150-00003     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (1)
References (7)
  • 1
    • 4243616662 scopus 로고
    • The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation
    • Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: Papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication. Chicago: Council of Biology Editors, Inc.
    • (1991) , pp. 27-31
    • Horrobin, D.1
  • 2
    • 0007756118 scopus 로고
    • A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine. Philadelphia: ISI Press
    • (1986)
    • Lock, S.1
  • 3
    • 0020052280 scopus 로고
    • Information overload: Solution by quality?
    • (1982) Br Med J , vol.284 , pp. 1289-1290
    • Lock, S.1
  • 5
    • 0033544284 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fair conduct and fair reporting of clinical trials
    • (1999) JAMA , vol.282 , pp. 1766-1768
    • Rennie, D.1
  • 6
    • 0007805446 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The tortoise and the hare: Is there a place in spine surgery for randomized trials?
    • (1999) Spine , vol.25 , pp. 1-4
    • Weinstein, J.1

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.