Simulated cost comparisons of hollow-fiber and integrated nanofiltration configurations

Water Research

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 2589-2597

  Sethi, Sandeep ^a   Wiesner, Mark R ^a  

^a RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost modeling; Membrane filtration; Nanofiltration; Optimization; Ultrafiltration; Water treatment

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS; FIBROUS MEMBRANES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MECHANICAL PERMEABILITY; NANOFILTRATION; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER FILTRATION;

HOLLOW-FIBER NANOFILTRATION (HFNF); HOLLOW-FIBER ULTRAFILTRATION (HFUF); SPIRAL-WOUND NANOFILTRATION (SWNF);

WATER TREATMENT;

DRINKING WATER; SURFACE WATER;

COST; FIBER MEMBRANE; NANOFILTRATION; PRODUCT COMPARISON; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; COST; HOLLOW FIBER MEMBRANE; MEMBRANE FILTER; NANOFILTRATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER QUALITY; WATER TREATMENT;

EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 0034660029     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00017-8     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Adham S., Jacangelo J.G., Laîné J.-M. Characteristics and costs of MF and UF plants. Journal American Water Works Association. 88:(5):1996;22-31.
2. Eykamp W. Microfiltration. Baker R.W. Membrane Separation Systems: Recent Developments and Future Directions. 1991;Noyes Data Corporation, Park Ridge, NJ.
3. Gumerman R.C., Burris B.E., Hansen S.P. Estimation of Small System Water Treatment Costs. 1985;US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
4. Jacangelo J.G., Laîné J.-M., Cummings E.W., Deutschmann A., Mallevialle J., Wiesner M.R. Evaluation of Ultrafiltration Membrane Pre-treatment and Nanofiltration of Surface Waters (90639). 1994;AWWA Research Foundation, Denver, CO.
5. Perry R.H., Chilton C.H. Chemical Engineers' Handbook. 1991;McGraw-Hill, New York.
6. Peters M.S., Timmerhaus K.D. Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers. 1991;McGraw-Hill, New York.
7. Pickering K.D., Wiesner M.R. Cost model for low-pressure membrane filtration. Journal of Environmental Engineering - ASCE. 119:(5):1993;772-797.
8. Sethi S. (1997) Transient permeate flux analysis, cost estimation and design optimization in crossflow membrane filtration processes. Ph.D thesis, Rice University, Houston.
9. Sethi S., Wiesner M.R. Performance and cost modeling of ultrafiltration. Journal of Environmental Engineering - ASCE. 121:(12):1996;874-883.
10. Sethi S., Wiesner M.R. Modeling of transient permeate flux in crossflow membrane filtration incorporating multiple particle transport mechanisms. Journal of Membrane Science. 136:1997;191-205.
11. Sethi S. and Wiesner M. R. (2000) Cost modeling and estimation of crossflow membrane filtration processes. Environmental Engineering Science, accepted.
12. Wiesner M.R., Hackney J., Sethi S., Jacangelo J.G., Laîné J.-M. Cost estimates for membrane filtration and conventional treatment. Journal American Water Works Association. 86:(12):1994;33-41.
13. Zeman L., Wales M. Polymer solute rejection by ultrafiltration membranes. Turbak A.F. Synthetic Membranes: Hyper and Ultrafiltration Uses. 1981;American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.