NMR chemical shift calculations within local correlation methods: The GIAO-LMP2 approach

Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

Volumn 2, Issue 10, 2000, Pages 2083-2090

  Gauss, Jürgen ^a   Werner, Hans Joachim ^b  

^a JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ATOM; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; MACROMOLECULE; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; THEORY;

EID: 0034656443     PISSN: 14639076     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/b000024h     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. 1 For recent reviews, see T. Helgaker, M. Jaszuński and K. Ruud, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 293; U. Fleischer, C. van Wüllen and W. Kutzelnigg, in Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, ed. P. v. R. Schleyer, N. L. Allinger, T. Clark, J. Gasteiger, P. A. Kollmann, H. F. Schaefer and P. R. Schreiner, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1998, p. 1827; see also the annual reviews by C. J. Jameson, in Specialist Periodical Reports on NMR, Royal Society of Chemistry, London.
2. 1 For recent reviews, see T. Helgaker, M. Jaszuński and K. Ruud, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 293; U. Fleischer, C. van Wüllen and W. Kutzelnigg, in Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, ed. P. v. R. Schleyer, N. L. Allinger, T. Clark, J. Gasteiger, P. A. Kollmann, H. F. Schaefer and P. R. Schreiner, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1998, p. 1827; see also the annual reviews by C. J. Jameson, in Specialist Periodical Reports on NMR, Royal Society of Chemistry, London.
3. 1 For recent reviews, see T. Helgaker, M. Jaszuński and K. Ruud, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 293; U. Fleischer, C. van Wüllen and W. Kutzelnigg, in Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry, ed. P. v. R. Schleyer, N. L. Allinger, T. Clark, J. Gasteiger, P. A. Kollmann, H. F. Schaefer and P. R. Schreiner, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 1998, p. 1827; see also the annual reviews by C. J. Jameson, in Specialist Periodical Reports on NMR, Royal Society of Chemistry, London.
4. 2 (a) F. London, J. Phys. Radium, 1937, 8, 397;
5. (b) H. F. Hameka, Mol. Phys., 1958, 1, 203;
6. (c) R. Ditchfield, Mol. Phys., 1974, 27, 789.
7. 3 (a) W. Kutzelnigg, Isr. J. Chem., 1980, 19, 193;
8. (b) M. Schindler and W. Kutzelnigg, J. Chem. Phys., 1982, 76, 1919.
9. 4 A. E. Hansen and T. D. Bouman, J. Chem. Phys., 1985, 82, 5035.
10. 5 For a review, see W. Kutzelnigg, U. Fleischer and M. Schindler, in NMR Basic Principles and Progress, Springer, Berlin, 1990, vol. 23, p. 165.
11. 6 K. Wolinski, J. F. Hinton and P. Pulay, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 8251.
12. 7 M. Häser, R. Ahlrichs, H. P. Baron, P. Weis and H. Horn, Theor. Chim. Acta, 1992, 83, 435.
13. 8 U. Meier, C. van Wüllen and M. Schindler, J. Comput. Chem., 1992, 13, 551.
14. 9 See, for example, J. Gauss, Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 1001.
15. 10 D. Sundholm, J. Gauss and A. Schäfer, J. Chem. Phys., 1996, 105, 11051.
16. 11 P. Buzek, P. v. R. Schleyer, H. Vancik, Z. Mihalic and J. Gauss, Angew. Chem., 1994, 104, 470.
17. 12 (a) H. U. Siehl, T. Müller, J. Gauss, P. Buzek and P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 6384;
18. (b) J. F. Stanton, J. Gauss and H. U. Siehl, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1996, 262, 183.
19. 13 (a) G. Magyarfalvi and P. Pulay, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1994, 225, 280;
20. (b) M. Bühl, W. Thiel, U. Fleischer and W. Kutzelnigg, J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 4000;
21. (c) M. Bühl, J. Gauss and J. F. Stanton, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1995, 241, 248.
22. 14 K. O. Christe, W. W. Wilson, J. A. Sheehy and J. A. Boatz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 2004.
23. 15 See, for example, the discussion in: C. van Wüllen, J. Chem. Phys., 1995, 102, 2806.
24. 16 M. Kollwitz and J. Gauss, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1996, 260, 639.
25. 17 M. Kollwitz, M. Häser and J. Gauss, J. Chem. Phys., 1998, 108, 8295.
26. 18 J. Gauss and J. F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys., 1995, 103, 3561.
27. 19 J. Gauss and J. F. Stanton, J. Chem. Phys., 1996, 104, 2574.
28. 20 S. Saebø and P. Pulay, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 1993, 44, 213, and references therein.
29. 21 (a) O. Vahtras, J. Almlöf and M. Feyereisen, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1993, 213, 514;
30. (b) F. Weigend and M. Häser, Theor. Chem. Acc., 1997, 97, 331;
31. (c) F. Weigend, M. Häser, H. Patzelt and R. Ahlrichs, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1998, 294, 143.
32. 22 P. Y. Ayala and G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys., 1999, 110, 3660.
33. 23 (a) R. Murphy, M. Beachy, M. Rignalda and R. Friesner, J. Chem. Phys., 1995, 103, 1481;
34. (b) M. P. Beachy, D. Chasman, R. B. Murphy, T. A. Halgren and R. A. Friesner, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 5908;
35. (c) R. B. Murphy, W. T. Pollard and R. A. Friesner, J. Chem. Phys., 1997, 106, 5073;
36. (d) G. Reynolds, T. J. Martinez and E. A. Carter, J. Chem. Phys., 1996, 105, 6455;
37. (e) G. Reynolds and E. A. Carter, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1997, 265, 160.
38. 24 C. Hampel and H.-J. Werner, J. Chem. Phys., 1996, 104, 6286.
39. 25 P. E. Maslen and M. Head-Gordon, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1998, 283, 102.
40. 26 G. Hetzer, P. Pulay and H.-J. Werner, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1998, 290, 143.
41. 27 M. Schütz, G. Hetzer and H.-J. Werner, J. Chem. Phys., 1999, 111, 5691.
42. 28 M. Schütz and H.-J. Werner, J. Chem. Phys., in the press.
43. 29 M. Schütz and H.-J. Werner, Chem. Phys. Lett., 2000, 318, 370.
44. 30 A. El Azhary, G. Rauhut, P. Pulay and H.-J. Werner, J. Chem. Phys., 1998, 108, 5185.
45. 31 G. Rauhut, A. El Azhary, F. Eckert, U. Schumann and H.-J. Werner, Spectrochim. Acta, 1999, 55, 651.
46. 32 M. Schütz, G. Rauhut and H.-J. Werner, J. Phys. Chem., 1998, 102, 5997.
47. 33 M. Schütz, K. Pflüger, U. Schumann, G. Rauhut, A. Schäfer and H.-J. Werner, to be published.
48. 34 J. Gauss, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1992, 191, 614.
49. 35 J. Gauss, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 99, 3629.
50. 36 J. F. Stanton, J. Gauss, J. D. Watts, W. J. Lauderdale and R. J. Bartlett, Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp., 1992, 26, 879.
51. 37 (a) F. Boys, Rev. Mod. Phys., 1960, 32, 296;
52. (b) J. M. Foster and S. F. Boys, Rev. Mod. Phys., 1960, 32, 300.
53. 38 C. Edminston and K. Ruedenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys., 1963, 35, 457.
54. 39 J. Pipek and P. G. Mezey, J. Chem. Phys., 1989, 90, 4916.
55. 40 W. von Niessen, J. Chem. Phys., 1972, 56, 4290.
56. 41 N. C. Handy and H. F. Schaefer, J. Chem. Phys., 1984, 81, 5031.
57. 42 J. Gerrat and I. M. Mills, J. Chem. Phys., 1968, 49, 1719.
58. 43 MOLPRO is a package of ab initio programs written by H.-J. Werner and P. J. Knowles, with contributions from R. D. Amos, A. Berning, D. L. Cooper, M. J. O. Deegan, A. J. Dobbyn, F. Eckert, C. Hampel, T. Leininger, R. Lindh, A. W. Loyd, W. Meyer, M. E. Mura, A. Nicklass, P. Palmieri, K. Peterson, R. Pitzer, P. Pulay, G. Rauhut, M. Schütz, H. Stoll, A. J. Stone and T. Thorsteinsson.
59. 44 A. Schäfer, H. Horn and R. Ahlrichs, J. Chem. Phys., 1991, 97, 2571. The dzp basis consists of an (8s4pld/4s2pld) contraction for C, N, O and a (4s1p/2s1p) contraction for H; the tzp basis of a (9s5p1d/5s3p1d) contraction for C, N, O and a (5s1p/3s1p) contraction for H; and the qz2p basis of an (11s7p2d/6s4p2d) contraction for C, N, O and a (7s2p/4s2p) contraction for H. Polarization exponents were chosen as described in ref. 35 and spherical Gaussians are used.
60. 45 Calculations have been carried out using the CCSD(T)/ccpCVQZ optimized geometry reported in: J. Gauss and J. F. Stanton, J. Mol. Struct., 1999, 485-486, 43.
61. 46 The computed shieldings for tetramethylsilane (TMS) are 199.1 (SCF), 205.9 (MP2) and 206.7 (LMP2) when using the dzp/dz basis, and 193.2 (SCF), 199.0 (MP2) and 199.4 (LMP2) when using the tzp/dz basis.
62. 13C shifts.
63. 48 J. R. Cheeseman, G. W. Trucks, T. A. Keith and M. J. Frisch, J. Chem. Phys., 1996, 104, 5497.
64. 49 M. Kaupp, O. L. Malkina and V. G. Malkin, J. Chem. Phys., 1997, 106, 9201.