How to read a clinical trial report;Lire un compte rendu d'essai clinique

Revue du Praticien

Volumn 50, Issue 8, 2000, Pages 838-845

  Bergmann, Jean François ^a   Chassany, Olivier ^a  

^a HÔPITAL LARIBOISIÈRE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; METHODOLOGY; POPULATION RESEARCH; RANDOMIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SAMPLE SIZE;

EID: 0034655791     PISSN: 00352640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Spriez A, Dupin-Spriez R, Simon P. Méthodologie des essais cliniques des médicaments. Bâle : Karger, 1993 : 269 pp.
2. Caulin C, Chastang C, Dahan R. Méthodologie de l'évaluation thérapeutique, Paris : Masson, 1993 : 340 pp.
3. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ, for the Evidence-Based Medecine Working Group. Users' guides to the medical literature. II : how to use an article about therapy or prevention, B :what were the results antd will they help me in caring for my patients ? JAMA 1994 ; 271 : 59-63.
4. Bonnie S, Martin R. Why are randomized controlled trials important? BMJ 1998 ; 316 : 201.
5. e édition, Paris : Flammarion Médecine-Science, 1996 : 2799-803.
6. Guyatt GH, Juniper EF, Walter SD, Griffith LE, Goldstein RS. Interpreting treatment effects in randomized trials. BMJ 1998 ; 316 : 690-3.
7. Moher D, Duiberg CS, Wells GA. Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1994 ; 272 : 122-4.
8. Chalmers TC, Smith H, Blackburn B et al. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Controlled Clin Trials 1981 ; 2 : 31-49.
9. Marcus M, Reidenberg MD. Decreasing publication bias. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1998 ; 63 : 1-3.
10. Poynard T. Évaluation de la qualité méthodologique des essais thérapeutiques randomisés. Presse Med 1988 : 17 : 31-8.
11. Lewis K, Sheiner MD, Donald B, Rubii PhD. Intention to treat analysis and the goals of clinical trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995 ; 57 : 6-15.
12. Haynes EB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ.Altman DG, Gardener MJ. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med 1990 ; 113 : 69-76.
13. Mildred K, Cho PhD, Lisa A, Bero PhD.The quality of drug studies published in symposium proceedings. Ann Intern Med 1996 ; 124 : 485-9.
14. Der Simonian R, Charrette LJ, McPeek B, Mosseller F. Reporting on methods in clinical trials. N Engl J Med 1982 ; 306 : 1332-7.
15. June W, Reidenberg MA,. Understanding the publication process of clinical pharmacology an therapeutics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991 ; 50 : 357-62.
16. Simon N, Jollier P, Gueyffier F,Tilement JP, Boissel JP. La collaboration Cochrane support de l'information thérapeutique. Rev Med Interne 1997 ; 18 : 332-5.
17. Internation Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Requirements for Manuscript Submitted to Biomedical Journals. Ann Intern Med 1997 ; 126 : 36-47.
18. Moher D, Jadad A, Nichol G, Pennam M,Tugwell T, Walsh S. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials : an annotated bibliography of scales and checklistes. Controlled Clin Trials 1995 ; 16 : 62-73.
19. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement JAMA 1996 ; 124 : 741-3.
20. The Asilomar Working Group on Recommendations for Reporting of Clinical Trials in the Biomedical Literature. Checklist of information for invlusion in reports of clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 1996 ; 124 : 741-3.
21. Oxman AD. Checklists for review articles. BMJ 1994 ; 309 : 648-51.
22. Salmi LR, Collet JP et le département d'épidémiologie et de biostatistique de l'université McMaster. Lecture critique des articles médicaux. Rev Prat 1991 ; 41 : 2597-605.
23. Feinstein AR, Horwitz RI. Problems in the "Evidence" of "Evidence-based Medicine". Am J Med 1997 ; 103 : 529-35.
24. Chatellier G, Zapletal E, Lemaitre D, Menard J, Degoulet P.The number needed to treat :a clinically useful normogram in its proper context. BMJ 1996 ; 312 : 426-9.