Total evidence: Molecules, morphology, and the phylogenetics of cichlid fishes

Journal of Experimental Zoology

Volumn 288, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 76-92

  Farias, Izeni P ^a,b   Ortí, Guillermo ^a   Meyer, Axel ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF AMAZONAS   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; RNA 16S;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PERCH; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; CLASSIFICATION; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; PERCHES; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ANIMALIA; ASTRONOTUS; CICHLA; CICHLIDAE; GEOPHAGINES; HETEROCHROMIS; PISCES; PROKARYOTA; RETROCULUS;

EID: 0034655665     PISSN: 0022104X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-010X(20000415)288:1<76::AID-JEZ8>3.0.CO;2-P     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Ballard JWO, Thayer MK, Newton AF, Grismer ER. 1998. Data sets, partitions, and characters: philosophies and procedures for analyzing multiple data sets. Syst Biol 47:367-396.
2. Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42:795-803.
3. Bremer K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10:295-304.
4. Bull JJ, Huelsenbeck P, Cunningham CW, Swofford DL, Waddell PJ. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 42:384-397.
5. Cannatella DC, Hillis DM, Chippindale PT, Weigt L, Rand AS, Ryan MJ. 1998. Phylogeny of frogs of the Physalaemus pustulosus species group, with an examination of data incongruence. Syst Biol 47:311-335.
6. Chippindale PT, Wiens JJ. 1994. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst Biol 43:278-287.
7. Cichoki F. 1976. Cladistic history of cichlid fishes and reproductive strategies of the American genera Acarichthys, Biotodoma, and Geophagus. Ph.D. thesis. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
8. Cunningham CW. 1997. Can tree incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol Biol Evol 14:733-740.
9. de Queiroz A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst Biol 42:368-372.
10. de Queiroz A, Donoghue MJ, Kim J. 1996. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 26:657-681.
11. Eernisse DJ, Kluge AG. 1993. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules, and morphology. Mol Biol Evol 10:1170-1195.
12. Farris JS. 1989. The retention index and rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5:417-419.
13. Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
14. Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst Biol 44:570-572.
15. Farias IP, Schneider H, Sampaio I. 1998. Molecular phylogeny of Neotropical cichlids: the relationships of cichlasomines and heroines. In: Malabarba LR, Reis RE, Vari RP, Lucena ZM, Lucena CAS, editors. Phylogeny and classification of Neotropical fishes. Porto Alegre, Brasil: Edipucrs. p 499-508.
16. Farias IP, Ortí G, Sampaio I, Schneider H, Meyer A. 1999. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of the family Cichlidae: monophyly and fast molecular evolution of the Neotropical assemblage. J Mol Evol 48:703-711.
17. Greenwood PH. 1991. Speciation. In: Keenleyside MHA, editor. Cichlid fishes - behavior, ecology, and evolution. London: Chapman and Hall, p 86-102.
18. Gu X, Fu Y-X, Li W-H. 1995. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. Mol Biol Evol 12:546-557.
19. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 22:160-174.
20. Huelsenbeck JP, Bull JJ, Cunningham CW. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. TREE 11:152-158.
21. Keenleyside MHA, editor. 1991. Cichlid Fishes - behavior, ecology, and evolution. London: Chapman and Hall.
22. Kidd KK, Sgaramella-Zonta LA. 1971. Phylogenetic analysis: concepts and methods. Am J Hum Genet 23:235-252.
23. Kluge AG. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst Zool 38:7-25.
24. Kluge AG. 1998. Total evidence or taxonomic congruence: Cladistics or consensus classification. Cladistics 14:151-158.
25. Kluge AG, Farris JS. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst Zool 18:1-32.
26. Kullander SO. 1983. A revision of the South American cichlid genus Cichlasoma. Stockholm: Swedish Museum of Natural History.
27. Kullander SO 1998. A phylogeny and classification of the South American Cichlidae (Teleostei: Perciformes). In: Malabarba LR, Reis RE, Vari RP, Lucena ZM, Lucena CAS, editors. Phylogeny and classification of Neotropical fishes. Porto Alegre, Brasil: Edipucrs. p 461-498.
28. Kumar S. 1996. PHYLTEST: phylogeny hypothesis testing software. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.
29. Liu FR, Miyamoto MM. 1999. Phylogenetic assessment of molecular and morphological data for eutherian mammals. Syst Biol 48:54-64.
30. Lopez JV, Culver M, Stephens C, Johnson WE, O'Brien SJ. 1997. Rates of nuclear and cytoplasmic mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence in mammals. Mol Biol Evol 14:277-286.
31. Lowe-McConnell RH. 1991. Ecology of cichlids in South American and African waters, excluding the African Great Lakes. In: Keenleyside MHA, editor. Cichlid fishes - behavior, ecology, and evolution. London: Chapman and Hall, p 60-85.
32. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 1992. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3.0. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
33. Martin AP, Bermingham E. 1998. Systematics and evolution of lower Central American cichlids inferred from analysis of cytochrome b gene sequence. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9:192-203.
34. Martin AP, Palumbi SR. 1993. Body size, metabolic rate, generation time, and the molecular clock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:4087-4091.
35. Mayer WE, Tichy H, Klein J. 1998. Phylogeny of African cichlid fishes as revealed by molecular markers. Heredity 80:702-714.
36. Meyer A. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary processes in East African cichlid fishes. Trend Ecol Evol 8:279-284.
37. Meyer A. 1999. Homology and homoplasy: the retention of genetic programmes. In: Novatis Foundation Symposium 222. Homology. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. p 141-157.
38. Meyer A, Kocher TD, Basasibwaki P, Wilson AC. 1990. Monophyletic origin of Lake Victoria cichlid fishes suggested by mitochondrial DNA sequences. Nature Lond 347:550-553.
39. Miyamoto MM, Fitch WM. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst Biol 44:64-76.
40. Moore WS. 1995. Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. Evolution 49:718-726.
41. Naylor GJP, Brown WM. 1998. Amphioxus mitochondrial DNA, chordate phylogeny, and the limits of inference based on comparisons of sequences. Syst Biol 47:61-76.
42. Nishida M. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of tanganyikan cichlids: a molecular perspective. In: Kawanabe H, Hori M, Nagoshi M, editors. Fish communities in Lake Tanganyika. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto University Press, p 1-23.
43. Palumbi S, Martin A, Romano S, McMillian WO, Stice L, Grabowski G. 1991. The simple fool's guide to PCR. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
44. Penny D, Hendy MD. 1986. Estimating the reliability of evolutionary trees. Mol Biol Evol 3:403-417.
45. Quicke DLJ, Belshaw R. 1999. Incongruence between morphological data sets: an example from the evolution of endoparasitism among parasitic wasps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Syst Biol 48:436-454.
46. Robinson M, Gouy M, Gautier C, Mouchiroud D. 1998. Sensitivity of the relative -rate test to taxonomic sampling. Mol Biol Evol 15:1091-1098.
47. Rodrigo AG, Kelly-Borges M, Bergquist PR, Bergquist PL. 1993. A randomization test of the null hypothesis that two cladograms are sample estimates of a parametric phylogenetic tree. N Z J Bot 31:257-268.
48. Roe KL, Conkel D, Lydeard C. 1997. Molecular systematic of Middle American cichlid fishes and evolution of trophic-types in 'Cichlasoma (Amphilophus)' and 'C. (Thorichthys)'. Mol Phylogenet Evol 7:366-376.
49. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
50. Schmidt W and ag editorial team. 1996. La grandie Ile. Aqua Geographia 13:5-36.
51. Stiassny MLJ. 1981. The phyletic status of the family Cichlidae (Pisces: Perciformes): a comparative anatomical investigation. Neth J Zool 31:275-314.
52. Stiassny MLJ. 1991. Phylogenetic intrarelationships of the family Cichlidae. In: Keenleyside MHA, editor. Cichlid fishes - behavior, ecology, and evolution. London: Chapman and Hall, p 1-31.
53. Stiassny MLJ. 1992. Atavism, phylogenetic character reversals, and the origin of evolutionary novelties. Neth J Zool 42:260-276.
54. Stiassny MLJ, Meyer A. 1999. Cichlids of rift lakes. Sci Am 280:64-69.
55. Streelman JT, Karl SA. 1997. Reconstructing labroid evolution with single-copy nuclear DNA. Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1011-1020.
56. Streelman JT, Zardoya R, Meyer A, Karl SA. 1998. Multilocus phylogeny of cichlid fishes (Pisces: Perciformes): evolutionary comparison of microsatellite and single-copy nuclear loci. Mol Biol Evol 15:798-808.
57. Sturmbauer C. 1998. Explosive speciation in cichlid fishes of the African Great Lakes: a dynamic model of adaptive radiation. J Fish Biol 53:18-36.
58. Sturmbauer C, Meyer A. 1992. Genetic divergence, speciation and morphological stasis in a lineage of African cichlid fishes. Nature Lond 359:578-581.
59. Sturmbauer C, Verheyen E, Meyer A. 1994. Mitochondrial phytogeny of the Lamprologini, the major substrate spawning lineage of cichlid fishes from Lake Tanganyika in Eastern Africa. Mol Biol Evol 11:691-703.
60. Sullivan J 1996. Combining data with different distributions of among-site variations. Syst Biol 45:375-380.
61. Sültmann H, Mayer WE, Figueroa F, Tichy H, Klein J. 1995. Phylogenetic analysis of cichlid fishes using nuclear DNA markers. Mol Biol Evol 12:1033-1047.
62. Swofford DL. 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? In: Miyamoto MM, Cracraft J, editors. Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences. New York: Oxford University Press, p 295-333.
63. Swofford DL. 1998. PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and other methods, Version 4.0b. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
64. Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, editors. Molecular Systematics. Second edition. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. p 407-514.
65. Takahashi K, Terai Y, Nishida M, Okada N. 1998. A novel family of Short Interspersed Repetitive Elements (SINEs) from cichlids: the patterns of insertion of SINEs at orthologous loci support the proposed monophyly of four major groups of cichlid fishes in Lake Tanganyika. Mol Biol Evol 15:391-407.
66. Takezaki N, Rzhetsky A, Nei M. 1995. Phylogenetic test of the molecular clock and linearized trees. Mol Biol Evol 12:823-833.
67. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties, and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673-4680.
68. Wiens JJ. 1998. Combining data sets with different phylogenetic histories. Syst Biol 47:568-581.
69. Wu CI, Li WH. 1985. Evidence for higher rates of nucleotide substitution in rodents than in man. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:1741-1745.
70. Yang Z. 1993. Maximum likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol Biol Evol 10:1396-1401.
71. Zardoya R, Vollmer DM, Craddock C, Streelman JT, Karl SA, Meyer A. 1996. Evolutionary conservation of microsatellite flanking regions and their use in resolving the phylogeny of cichlid fishes (Pisces: Perciformes). Proc R Soc Lond B 263:1589-1598.