Quantum entanglement and classical communication through a depolarizing channel

Journal of Modern Optics

Volumn 47-2, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 325-331

  Bruss, Dagmar ^a   Faoro, Lara ^b   Macchiavello, Chiara ^c   Palma, G Massimo ^d  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^b POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

^d INFM   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; QUANTUM THEORY; TENSORS; VECTORS;

DEPOLARIZATION; QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT; QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING;

QUANTUM OPTICS;

EID: 0034652064     PISSN: 09500340     EISSN: 13623044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500340008244045     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bennett, C. H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., and Wootters, W., 1993. Phys. Rev. Lett., 70:1895
2. Ekert, A. K., 1991. Phys. Rev. Lett., 67:66
3. Jozsa, R., 1997. Geometric Issues in the Foundations of Science, Edited by:Hugett, S., Mason, L., Tod, K. P., Tsou, S. T., and Woodhouse, N. M. J., Oxford:Oxford University Press. (preprint quant-ph/9707034)
4. Preskill, J., 1998. Proc. R. Soc. London, 454:385
5. Bennett, C. H., Fuchs, C., and Smolin, J., 1997. Quantum Communication, Computing and Measurement, Edited by:Hirota, O., Holevo, A. S., and Caves, C. M., 79New York:Plenum Press. (preprint quant-ph/9611006).
6. Kraus, K., 1983. States, Effects, and Operations:Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory, Berlin:Springer.
7. Schumacher, B., and Westmoreland, M. D., 1997. Phys. Rev. A, 56:131
8. Holevo, A. S., IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, (preprint quant-ph/9611023)
9. Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., and Smolin, J., 1997. Phys. Rev. Lett., 78:3217 Bennett, C. H., Shor, P. W., Smolin, J. A., Terhal, B. M., and Thapliyal, A. W. preprint quant-ph/9904023.
10. Schlienz, J., and Mahler, G., 1995. Phys. Rev. A, 52:4396
11. Plenio, M. B., and Vedral, V., 1998. Contemp. Phys., 39:431 For a recent review see
12. Peres, A., 1993. Quantum Theory:Concepts and Methods, Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic.
13. Bennett, C. H., and Wiesner, S. J., 1992. Phys. Rev. Lett., 69:2881 It was pointed out that entanglement is useful in super-dense coding, Notice that our scenario is different from super-dense coding because in our case both qubits are transmitted through the noisy channel
14. Fuchs, C. A., 1997. 79:1162 For a different scenario see
15. Notice that our line of argument is based on the Schmidt decomposition and therefore it cannot be directly generalized to more than two uses of the channel