Biases in ecological studies: Utility of including within-area distribution of confounders

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 45-59

  Lasserre, Virginie ^a   Guihenneuc Jouyaux, Chantal ^a   Richardson, Sylvia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; DISEASE SIMULATION; ECOLOGY; LUNG CANCER; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

EID: 0034650513     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000115)19:1<45::AID-SIM276>3.0.CO;2-5     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Koopman, J. S. and Longini, I. M., Jr. The ecological effects of individual exposures and non linear disease dynamics in populations', American Journal of Public Health, 84, 836-842 (1994).
2. Richardson, S. 'Statistical methods for geographical correlation studies', in Elliott, P., Cuzick, J., English, D. and Stern, R. (eds), Geographical and enviornment Epidemiology: Methods for Small Area Studies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992.
3. Clayton, D., Bernardinelli, L. and Montomoli, C. 'Spatial correlation in ecological analysis', International Journal of Epidemiology, 22, 1193-1202 (1993).
4. Elliott, P., Martuzzi, M. and Shaddick, G. 'Spatial statistical methods in environmental epidemiology: a critique', Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 4, 137-159 (1995).
5. Marshall, R. 'A review of methods for the statistical analysis of spatial patterns of disease', Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 154, 421-441 (1991).
6. Robinson, W. S. 'Ecological correlations and the behaviour of individuals', American Sociological Review, 15, 351-357 (1950).
7. Richardson, S., Stücker, I. and Hémon, D. 'Comparison of relative risks obained in ecological and individual studies: some methodological considerations', International Journal of Epidemiology, 16, 111-120 (1987).
8. Piantadosi, S., Byar, D. P. and Green, S. B. 'The ecological fallacy', American Journal of Epidemiology, 127, (5), 893-904 (1988).
9. Greenland, S. and Morgenstern, H. 'Ecological bias, confounding and effect modification' International Journal of Epidemiology, 18, 269-274 (1989).
10. Greenland, S. and Robins, J. 'Ecological studies biases, misconceptions and counterexamples', American Journal of Epidemiology, 139, 747-760 (1994).
11. Susser, M. 'The logic in ecological: I, the logic of analysis', American Journal of Public Health, 84, 825-829 (1994).
12. Susser, M. 'The logic in ecological: II, the logic of design', American Journal of Public Health, 84, 830-835 (1994).
13. Plummer, M. and Clayton, D. 'Estimation of population exposure in ecological studies' (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 58, 113-126 (1996).
14. Prentice, R. and Sheppard, L. 'Dietary fat and cancer: consistency of the epidemiologic data, and disease prevention that may follow from a practical reduction in fat consumption', Cancer Causes Control, 1, 81-97 (1990).
15. Hunter, D. J., Spiegelman, D., Adami, H. O., Beeson, L., Van den Brandt, P. A., Folsom, A. R., Fraser, G. E., Goldbohm, R. A., Graham, S., Howe, G. R. et al. 'Cohort studies of fat intake and the risk of breast cancer - a pooled analysis', New England Journal of Medicine, 334, (6), 356-361 (1996).
16. Chen, J., Geissler, C., Parpia, B., Li, J. and Campbell, T. C. 'Antioxidant status and cancer mortality in China', International Journal of Epidemiology, 21, 625-635 (1992).
17. Cislaghi, C. and Nimis, P. L. 'Lichens, air pollution and lung cancer', Nature, 387, 463-464 (1997).
18. Richardson, S. and Hémon, D. 'Ecological bias and confounding' (Letter), International Journal of Epideiology, 19, 764-766 (1990).
19. Richardson, S., Guihenneuc-Jouyaux, C. and Lasserre, V. 'Ecological studies - bises, misconceptions, and counterexamples' (Letter), American Journal of Epidemiology, 143, 522-523 (1996).
20. Sheppard, L., Prentice, R. L. and Rossing, M. A. 'Design considerations for estimation of exposure effects on disease risk, using aggregate data studies', Statistics in Medicine, 15, 1849-1858 (1996).
21. Elliott, P. 'Design and analysis of multicentre epidemiological studies: the INTERSALT study', in Coronary Heart Disease Epidemiology: from Aetiology to Public Health, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1992, pp. 166-178.
22. Riboli, E, 'Nutrition and cancer: background and rationale of the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC)', Annales of Oncologie, 3, 783-791 (1992).
23. SAS. 'NLIN procedure', in SAS/STAT® User's Guide, Version 6, SAS, 1990.
24. Richardson, S. 'A method for testing the significance of geographical correlations with application to industrial lung cancer in France', Statistics in Medicine, 9, 515-528 (1990).
25. Rosenbaum, P. R. and Rubin, D. B. 'Difficulties with regression analyses of age-adjusted rates', Biometrics, 40, 437-443 (1984).
26. Simonato, L., Vineis, P. and Fletcher, A. C. 'Estimates of the proportion of lung cancer attributable to occupational exposure', Carcinogenesis, 9, 1159-1165 (1988).