Public health law in a new century. Part II: Public health powers and limits

JAMA

Volumn 283, Issue 22, 2000, Pages 2979-2984

  Gostin, Lawrence O ^a,b,c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN RIGHTS; LAW; MORALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; SAFETY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0034647329     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.283.22.2979     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Gostin LO. Public health law in a new century: part I: law as a tool to advance the community's health. JAMA. 2000;283:2837-2841.
2. South Dakota v Dole, 483 US 203 (1987).
3. NLRB v Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp, 301 US 1 (1937).
4. Gove PB, ed. Webster's Third New International Dictionary, Unabridged. Springfield, Mass: Merriam-Webster Inc; 1986:1753.
5. Novak WJ. The People's Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press; 1996.
6. Hodge JG Jr. Implementing modern public health goals through government: an examination of new federalism and public health law. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1997;14:93-126.
7. United States v Lopez, 115 SCt 1624 (1995).
8. New York v United States, 505 US 144 (1992).
9. Printz v United States, 117 SCt 2365 (1997).
10. United States v Morrison, _ SCt _ (2000).
11. Alden v Maine, 119 SCt 2240 (1999).
12. Kimel v Florida Board of Regents, 120 SCt 631 (2000).
13. US Const art I, §10, cl 2.
14. Gibbons v Ogden, 22 US (9 Wheat) 1 (1824).
15. Merritt DJ. Communicable disease and constitutional law: controlling AIDS. N Y U Law Rev. 1986;61:739-799.
16. Burris S. Rationality, review, and the politics of public health. Villanova Law Rev. 1989;34:933-982.
17. Kirk v Wyman, 65 SE 387 (SC 1909).
18. Jacobson v Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 197 US 11 (1905).
19. Viehmeister v White, 72 NE 97 (NY 1904).
20. Smith v Emery, 42 NYS 258 (1896).
21. Ex parte Company, 139 NE 204, 205-206 (Ohio 1922).
22. People ex rel Baker v Strautz, 54 NE 2d 441 (Ill 1944).
23. Jew Ho v Williamson, 103 F 10 (Cal 1900).
24. Stoddard TB, Rieman W. AIDS and the rights of the individual: toward a more sophisticated understanding of discrimination. Milbank Q. 1990;68(suppl 1):143-174.
25. Shapiro v Thompson, 394 US 618 (1969).
26. Cruzan v Director, Mo Dept of Health, 497 US 261 (1990).
27. Greene v Edwards, 265 SE 2d 662 (W Va 1980).
28. In re City of New York v Antoinette R, 630 NYS2d 1008 (1995).
29. Washington v Harper, 494 US 210 (1990).
30. Zucht v King, 260 US 174 (1922).
31. Skinner v Railway Labor Executives' Assn, 489 US 602 (1989).
32. Whalen v Roe, 429 US 589 (1977).
33. Epstein R. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1985.
34. Slaughter-House Cases, 83 US 36 (1873).
35. Parmet WE. From Slaughter-House to Lochner, the rise and fall of the constitutionalization of public health. Am J Legal Hist. 1996;40:476-505.
36. Lochner v New York, 198 US 45 (1905).
37. Ogden v Saunders, 25 US (12 Wheat) 213 (1827).
38. Manigault v Springs, 199 US 473 (1905).
39. Fried C. Order and Law: Arguing the Reagan Revolution: A Firsthand Account. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 1991.
40. Pennsylvania Coal v Mahon, 260 US 393 (1922).
41. Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council, 505 US 1003 (1992).
42. Preseault v United States, 100 F3d 1525 (1996).
43. Florida Rock Industry v United States, 18 F3d 1560 (Fed Cir 1994).
44. Philip Morris v Harshbarger, 159 F3d 670 (1st Cir 1998).