Health researchers' views of ethics committee functioning in New Zealand

New Zealand Medical Journal

Volumn 113, Issue 1111, 2000, Pages 210-214

  Paul, Charlotte ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NEW ZEALAND; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

ETHICS COMMITTEES; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; NEW ZEALAND; RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 0034625242     PISSN: 00288446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Department of Health. National standard for ethical committees established to review research and treatment protocols. Wellington: Dept of Health circular memorandum; 1988.
2. Heslop BF, Gray AJ. Medical research: who minds the minders? NZ Med J 1989; 102: 54.
3. Harvey V, Evans B. Research and patient care: what needs review and by whom? NZ Med J 1989; 102: 229.
4. Dockerty JD, Etwood M. The difficulties and costs of ethical assessment of a national research project. NZ Med J 1992; 105: 311-3.
5. Douglass AJ, Jarvis A. Monitoring of health research by ethics committees. NZ Med J 1998; 111: 79-81.
6. National Advisory Committee on Health and Disability Service Ethics. National standard for ethics committees. July 1996. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 1996.
7. Privacy Commissioner. Health Information Privacy Code 1994. Auckland: Office of the Privacy Commissioner; 1994.
8. The Health and Disability Commissioner (Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights) Regulations 1996. Wellington: NZ Government; 1996.
9. Nuremberg Code (1947). BMJ 1996; 313: 1448.
10. World Medical Association. Delcararion of Helsinki. Adopted by 18th World Medical Assembly. Helsinki, Finland: 1964.
11. CIOMS. International guidelines for epidemiological research. Geneva: Council for International Organisations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS); 1991.
12. Health Research Council Ethics Committee. Guidelines on ethics in health research. Auckland: Health Research Council of New Zealand; 1996.
13. Liddle BJ, Brazelton EW. Psychology faculty satisfaction and compliance with IRB procedures. IRB 1996; 18: 4-6.
14. Foster C. Ethics review of multi-centre research. A survey of multi-centre researchers in South Thames. London: Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College; 1996.
15. Dresser R. Time for new rules on human subject research. Hastings Cent Rep 1998; 28: 23-4.
16. Kass NE, Sugarman J, Faden R, Schoch-Spana M. Trust. The fragile foundation of contemporary biomedical research. Hastings Cent Rep 1996; 26: 25-9.
17. Edwards SJL, Lilford RJ, Hewison J. The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public and health care professionals. BMJ 1998; 317: 1209-12.
18. Glover M. Kaupapa Maori health research: a developing discipline. Proceedings of the Hui Whakatipu. Auckland: Health Research Council of New Zealand; 1999.
19. Health Research Council. Guidelines for researchers on health research involving Maori. Auckland: Health Research Council of New Zealand; 1998.
20. Jonsen AR. American moralism and the origins of bioethics in the United States. In: RS Downie, editor. Medical ethics. Aldershot: Dartmouth; 1996. p3-20.
21. McGough H. OPRR and FDA propose revised expedited review categories. IRB 1998; 20: 9-11.