|
Volumn 144, Issue 32, 2000, Pages 1537-1542
|
The value of the 'non diagnostic' lung scan - Further classification according to the risk of pulmonary embolism not reliable;De waarde van de 'niet-diagnostische' longscan - Verdere classificatie naar de kans op longembolie niet betrouwbaar
a
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
DISEASE CLASSIFICATION;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LUNG ANGIOGRAPHY;
LUNG EMBOLISM;
LUNG SCINTISCANNING;
LUNG VENTILATION PERFUSION RATIO;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
REVIEW;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
PULMONARY EMBOLISM;
RADIONUCLIDE ANGIOGRAPHY;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
VENTILATION-PERFUSION RATIO;
|
EID: 0034609201
PISSN: 00282162
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (20)
|