A model for high-pressure ultrafiltration of blood

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 21-30

  Moussy, Yvonne ^a,b  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

^b Iowa State University of Science and Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Concentration polarization; Hemofiltration; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; CELLS; DIFFUSION; HEMODYNAMICS; HIGH PRESSURE ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

HEMOFILTRATION; HIGHLY PERMEABLE MEMBRANES; PRESSURE INDEPENDENT FILTRATION FLUX REGION;

ULTRAFILTRATION;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BLOOD FILTRATION; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; FLOW RATE; HYDRAULIC PERMEABILITY; HYPERBARISM; MODEL; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 0034609028     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000705)69:1<21::AID-BIT3>3.0.CO;2-F     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Blatt WF, Dravid A, Michaels A, Nelsen L. 1970. Solute polarization and cake formation in membrane ultrafiltration: Causes, consequences, and control techniques. In: Flinn JE editor. Membrane science and technology. New York: Plenum Press. p 47-97.
2. Chien S, Usami S, Taylor H, Lunberg J, Gregersen M. 1966. Effects of hematocrit and plasma proteins on human blood rheology at low shear rates. J Appl Physiol 21:81-87.
3. Colton CK. 1987. Analysis of membrane processes for blood purification. Blood Purif 5:202-251.
4. Colton CK, Henderson LW, Ford S, Lysaght M. 1975. Kinetics of hemo-diafiltration. I. In vitro transport characteristics of a hollow-fiber blood ultrafilter. J Lab Clin Med 85(3):355-371.
5. Deen WM. 1998. Analysis of transport phenomena. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Ding LH, Jaffrin MY, Defossez M. 1993. Concentration polarization formation in ultrafiltration of blood and plasma. J Membr Sci 84: 293-301.
7. Eckstein EC, Bailey DG, Shapiro AH. 1977. Self-diffusion of particles in a shear flow of a suspension. J Fluid Mech 79:191-208.
8. Jaffrin MY, Ding LH, Defossez M, Laurent JM. 1995. Interpretation of transient ultrafiltration and microfiltralion of blood and protein solutions. Chem Eng Sci 50:907-915.
9. Lee Y, Clark M. 1997. A numerical model of steady-state permeate flux during cross-flow ultrafiltration. Desalin 109:241-251.
10. Leveque MA. 1928. Les lois de la transmission de chaleur par convection. Ann Mines 13:201-299.
11. MA RP, Gooding CH, Alexander WK. 1985. A dynamic model for low-pressure, hollow-fiber ultrafiltration. AIChE J 31(10):1728-1732.
12. Nakao S-I, Nomura T, Kimura S. 1979. Characteristics of macromolecular gel layer formed on ultrafiltration tubular membrane. AIChE J 25(4): 615-622.
13. Ofsthun NJ, Zydney AL. 1994. Importance of convection in artificial kidney treatment. Contrib Nephrol 108:53-70.
14. Okazaki M, Yoshida F. 1976. Ultrafiltration of blood: Effect of hematocrit on ultrafiltration rate. Ann Biomed Eng 4:138-150.
15. Schneck DJ. 1995. An outline of cardiovascular structure and function. In: Bronzino JD, editor. The biomedical engineering handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. p 3-14.
16. Su Z-G, Colton CK. 1994. Crossflow membrane filtration. Bioproc Technol 18:57-85.
17. Wiesner MR, Chellam S. 1992. Mass transport considerations for pressure-driven membrane processes. J AWWA 84(1): 88-95.
18. Yuan SW, Finkelstein AB. 1956. Laminar pipe flow with injection and suction through a porous wall. Trans ASME 78:719-724.
19. Zydney AL, Colton CK. 1988. Augmented solute transport in the shear flow of a concentrated suspension. PhysicoChem Hydrodyn 10(1): 77-96.
20. Zydney AL, Colton CK. 1986. A concentration polarization model for the filtrate flux in cross-flow microfiltration of particulate suspensions. Chem Eng Commun 47:1-21.