Effect of sodium hydroxide and alkaline hydrogen peroxide treatment on physical and chemical characteristics and IVOMD of mustard straw

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Volumn 84, Issue 3-4, 2000, Pages 257-264

  Mishra, A S ^a   Chaturvedi, O H ^a   Khali, Ananta ^a   Prasad, R ^a   Santra, A ^a   Misra, A K ^a   Parthasarathy, S ^a   Jakhmola, R C ^a  

^a CENTRAL SHEEP AND WOOL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

Chemical characteristics; Hydrogen peroxide; In vitro digestibility; Mustard straw; Physical characteristics; Sodium hydroxide

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034607760     PISSN: 03778401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00109-7     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Amjed M., Jung H.G., Donker J.D. Effect of alkaline hydrogen peroxide treatment on cell wall composition and digestion kinetics of sugarcane residues and wheat straw. J. Anim. Sci. 70:1992;2877-2884.
2. AOAC, 1984. Official Method of Analysis. 14th Edition, Washington, DC, Method No. 7.009. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 153 pp.
3. Bhargava P.K., Orskov E.R., Walli T.K. Effect of soaking, ensilage and hydrogen peroxide treatment of barley straw on rumen degradability. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 22:1989;295-303.
4. Chaturvedi O.H., Prasad R., Mishra A.S., Santra A., Khali A., Parthasarathy S., Jakhmola R.C. Effect of different treatments on tenacity and IVDMD of mustard straw. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 68:1998a;585-586.
5. Chaturvedi O.H., Mishra A.S., Misra A.K., Karim S.A. Nutritive value of biologically treated mustard (Brassica campestris) straw. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 15:1998;55-57.
6. Chaturvedi, O.H., Santra, A., Mishra, A.S., Misra, A.K., Prasad, R., Karim, S.A., 2000. Effect of Coprinus fimetarius on nutritive value of urea treated mustard straw. Indian J. Anim. Sci. (in press).
7. Chaturvedi O.H., Santra A., Mishra A.S., Prasad R., Jakhmola R.C. Effect of soaking medium and hours of soaking on nutritional value of mustard (Brassica campestris) straw. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 69:1999;739-741.
8. Chaturvedi O.H., Tiwari A.D. Performance of crossbred heifers fed urea treated wheat straw stored by three different methods. Indian J. Anim. Prod. Mgmt. 13:1997;152-158.
9. Chaudhry A.S. Nutrient composition, digestion and rumen fermentation in sheep of wheat straw treated with calcium oxide, sodium hydroxide and alkaline hydrogen peroxide. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 74:1998;315-328.
10. Chaudhry A.S., Miller E.L. In vitro digestibility of barley and wheat straws treated with hydrogen peroxide, sodium hydroxide and sodium peroxide under various conditions. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 50:1994;1-15.
11. Chaudhry A.S., Miller E.L. The effect of sodium hydroxide and alkaline hydrogen peroxide on chemical composition of wheat straw and voluntary intake, growth and digesta kinetics in store lambs, growth and digesta kinetics in store lambs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 60:1996;69-86.
12. Chesson, A., 1986. The evaluation of dietary fibre. In: Livingstone, R.M. (Ed.), Feedstuff Evaluation and Experimental Development Service Publication 1. Rowett Res. Inst. Aberdeen, Scotland, UK.
13. Givens D.I., Everington J.M., Adamson A.H. Chemical composition, digestibility in vitro, digestibility and energy value in vivo of untreated cereal straws produced on farms throughout England. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 26:1989;323-325.
14. Goering, H.K., Van Soest, P.J., 1970. Forage fibre analysis. Apparatus, reagents, procedure and some applications. Agric. Handbook 379. ARS. USDA, Washington DC, pp. 1-20.
15. Gomez, K.A., Gomez, A.A., 1976. Statistical procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edition, pp. 84-129.
16. Gould J.M. Alkaline peroxide delignification of agricultural residues to enhance enzymatic sacchrification. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 26:1984;46-52.
17. Gould J.M. Studies on the mechanism of alkaline hydrogen peroxide delignification of agricultural residues. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 27:1985;225-231.
18. Guggolz J., Saunders R.M., Kohler G.O., Klopfenstein T.J. Enzymatic evaluation of processes improving agricultural wastes for ruminant feed. J. Anim. Sci. 33:1971;167-170.
19. Gupta, K.S., 1998. Studies on improvement of mustard (Brassica campestris) straw: effect of sodium hydroxide-hydrogen peroxide treatment. M.Sc. Thesis, Mahatma Gandhi Chitrakoot Gramodaya Vishwavidyalaya, Chitrakoot, India.
20. Kerley M.S., Fahey G.C. Jr., Berger L.L., Merchen N.R., Gould J.M. Effect of treating wheat straw with pH-regulated solutions of alkaline hydrogen peroxide on nutrient digestion by sheep. J. Dairy Sci. 70:1987;2078-2084.
21. Klopfenstein T.J. Chemical treatment of crop residues. J. Anim. Sci. 46:1978;841-848.
22. Lewis S.M., Holzgraefe D.P., Berger L.L., Fahey G.C. Jr., Gould J.M., Fanta G.C. Alkaline hydrogen peroxide treatment of crop residues to increase ruminal dry matter disappearance in sacco. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 17:1987;179-199.
23. 2 on the site and extent of digestion in sheep. Anim.Feed Sci. Technol. 40:1993;121-133.
24. Mishra A.S., Chaturvedi O.H., Misra A.K., Karim S.A. A note on chemical composition of untreated and urea treated mustard (Brassica campestris) straw. Indian J. Small Rumin. 2:1996;49-51.
25. Misra A.K., Karim S.A., Patnayak B.C., Verma D.L. Growth performance of lambs on mustard (Brassica campestris) straw based complete feed. Indian J. Small Rumin. 1:1995;31-34.
26. Reddy M.R., Chandrasekharaiah M., Govindaiah T., Reddy G.V.N. Effect of physical processing on the nutritive value of sugarcane bagasse in goats and sheep. Small Rumin. Res. 10:1993;25-31.
27. Reddy A.S., Prasad J.R., Rao Z.P. Evaluation of rice straw based rations containing different forms of urea in steers. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 15:1998;198-202.
28. Sundstol, F., Owen, E. (Eds.), 1984. Straw and Other Fibrous By-product As Feed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 106-240.
29. Tarkow H., Feist W.C. A mechanism for improving the digestibility of lignocellulosic materials with dilute alkali and liquid ammonia. Am. Chem. Soc. Adv. Chem. Ser. 95:1969;197-218.
30. Tilley J.M.A., Terry R.A. A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crop. J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 18:1963;104-111.