Formation and dissociation kinetics and crystal structures of nickel(II)-macrocyclic tetrathiaether complexes in acetonitrile. Comparison to nickel(II)-macrocyclic tetramines

Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 1444-1453

  Kulatilleke, Chandrika P ^a   Goldie, Scott N ^a   Heeg, Mary Jane ^a   Ochrymowycz, L A ^b   Rorabacher, D B ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETONITRILE; ETHER DERIVATIVE; MACROCYCLIC COMPOUND; NICKEL;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; DISSOCIATION CONSTANT; HYDROGEN BOND; LIGAND BINDING; PROTON TRANSPORT; SOLVATION;

EID: 0034599294     PISSN: 00201669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ic991019+     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. (a) Wayne State University. (b) University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire.
2. Eigen, M.; Wilkins, R. G. In Mechanisms of Inorganic Reactions; Gould, R. F., Ed.; Advances in Chemistry 49; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1965; pp 55-67.
3. Margerum, D. W.; Cayley, G. R.; Weatherbum, D. C.; Pagenkopf, G. K. In Coordination Chemistry, Martell, A. E., Ed.; Vol. 2; ACS Monograph 174; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1978; pp 1-220.
4. Elias, H. Coord Chem. Rev. 1999, 187, 37-73.
5. Studies involving crown ethers have focused on their reaction kinetics with alkali metal ions for which the kinetic parameters for the dissociation of single metal-solvent bonds cannot be characterized because of their lability. Instead, the overall complexation kinetics are largely controlled by ligand conformational changes (the Eigen -Winkler mechanism). (a) Diebler, H.; Eigen, M.; Ilgenfritz, G.; Maass, G.; Winkler, R. Pure Appl. Chem. 1969, 20, 93-115.
6. (b) Eigen, M. In Quantum Statistical Mechanics in the Natural Sciences; Kursunoglu, B., Mintz, S. L., Widmayer, S. M., Eds.; Plenum: New York, 1974; pp 37-61.
7. (c) Chock, P. B.; Eggers, F.; Eigen, M.; Winkler, R. Biophys. Chem. 1977, 6, 239-251.
8. Kaden, T. Helv. Chim. Acta 1969, 53, 617-632.
9. Margerum, D. W.; Rorabacher, D. B.; Clarke, J. F. G., Jr. Inorg. Chem. 1963, 2, 667-677.
10. Lin, C.-T.; Rorabacher, D. B.; Cayley, G. R.; Margerum, D. W. Inorg. Chem. 1975, 14, 919-925.
11. Hay, R. W.; Norman, P. R. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1980, 45, L139-L141.
12. Hertli, L.; Kaden, T. A. Helv. Chim. Acta 1981, 64, 33-37.
13. Roper, J. R.; Elias, H. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 1202-1210, 1210-1214.
14. Sanzenbacher, R.; Elias, H. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1996, 246, 267-274.
15. Sanzenbacher, R.; Elias, H. Unpublished results cited in reference 4.
16. Diaddario, L. L.; Zimmer, L. L.; Jones, T. E.; Sokol, L. S. W. L.; Cruz, R. B.; Yee, E. L.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.; Rorabacher, D. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 3511-3520. Jones, T. E.; Zimmer, L. L.; Diaddario, L. L.; Rorabacher, D. B.; Ochrymowycz, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 7163-7165.
17. Diaddario, L. L.; Zimmer, L. L.; Jones, T. E.; Sokol, L. S. W. L.; Cruz, R. B.; Yee, E. L.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.; Rorabacher, D. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 3511-3520. Jones, T. E.; Zimmer, L. L.; Diaddario, L. L.; Rorabacher, D. B.; Ochrymowycz, L. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 7163-7165.
18. Pett, V. B.; Leggett, G. H.; Cooper, T. H.; Reed, P. R.; Situmeang, D.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.; Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 2164-2169.
19. Krylova, K.; Jackson, K. D.; Vroman, J. A.; Grall, A. J.; Snow, M. R.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.; Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 6216-6223.
20. Kulatilleke, C. P.; Goldie, S. N.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.; Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem., 1999, 38, 5906-5909.
21. Meyer, F. K.; Newman, K. E.; Merbach, A. E. Inorg. Chem. 1979, 18, 2142-2148.
22. (a) Campbell, I. D.; Carver, J. P.; Dwek, R. A.; Nummelin, A. J.; Richards, R. E. Mol. Phys. 1971, 20, 913-922.
23. 8 ion, would be expected to exhibit a regular octahedral geometry.
24. Davis, P. H.; White, L. K.; Belford, R. L. Inorg. Chem. 1975, 14, 1753-1757.
25. Desper, J. M.; Vyvyan, J. R.; Mayer, M. J.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.; Gellman, S. H. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 381-382.
26. Aronne, L.; Dunn, B. C.; Vyvyan, J. R.; Souvignier, C. W.; Mayer, M. J.; Howard, T. A.; Salhi, C. A.; Goldie, S. N.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.; Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 357-369.
27. Dunn, B. C.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.; Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 1954-1956.
28. Chattopadhyay, P. K.; Coetzee, J. F. Anal. Chem. 1974, 46, 2014-2018.
29. Sheldrick, G. SHELX-S6, SHELXL-93, and SADABS, University of Goettingen, Germany, 1986, 1993, and 1996.
30. Steinfeld, J. I.; Francisco, J. F.; Hase, W. L. Chemical Kinetics and Dynamics, 2nd ed.; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999; pp 23-24.
31. Ambundo, E. A.; Deydier, M.-V.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.; Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem., in press.
32. For the previous stability constant measurements (ref 17), solutions allowed to equilibrate for 1 h and for 24 h gave identical results. Therefore, it was concluded that complete equilibration was achieved within 1 h.
33. Diaddario, L. L., Jr.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.; Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 2347-2353.
34. Aronne, L.; Yu, Q.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.; Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 1844-1851.
35. Pett, V. B.; Diaddario, L. L., Jr.; Dockal, E. R.; Corfield, P. W.; Ceccarelli, C; Glick, M. D.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.; Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 22, 3661-3670.
36. Thöm, V. J.; Fox, C. C.; Boeyens, J. C. A.; Hancock, R. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 5947-5955.
37. Kobiro, K.; Nakayama, A.; Hiro, T.; Suwa, M.; Tobe, Y. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 676-685.
38. Rosen, W.; Busch, D. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 4694-4697.
39. Rosen, W.; Busch, D. H. Inorg. Chem. 1970, 9, 262-265.
40. (a) Adam, K. R.; Atkinson, I. M.; Lindoy, L. F. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 480-481.
41. (b) Adam, K. R.; Antolovich, M.; Brigden, L. G.; Lindoy, L. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 3346-3351.
42. Villeneuve, N. M.; Schroeder, R. R.; Ochrymowycz, L. A.; Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem. 1997, 36, 4475-4483.
43. Cooper, C. G.; Zimmer, M. Struct. Chem. 1999, 10, 17-27.
44. The term "protophilic" refers to solvents that can accept a hydrogen ion. Bates, R. G. Determination of pH: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1973; p 173.
45. Wilkins, R. G. Kinetics and Mechanism of Reactions of Transition Metal Complexes, 2nd ed.; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1991; pp 205-208.
46. Lin, C.-T.; Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem. 1973, 12, 2402-2410. For the "donor atom with a tail" concept, see p 2406, column 2.
47. Fuoss, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 5059-5061. Eigen, M.; Kruse, W.; Maass, G.; DeMaeyer, L. Prog. React. Kinet. 1964, 2, 285-318.
48. Fuoss, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 5059-5061. Eigen, M.; Kruse, W.; Maass, G.; DeMaeyer, L. Prog. React. Kinet. 1964, 2, 285-318.
49. Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem. 1966, 5, 1891-1899.
50. Ducommun, Y.; Newman, K. E.; Merbach, A. E. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 3696-3703.
51. Neely, J.; Connick, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 3476-3478.
52. Sokol, L. S. W. L.; Fink, T. D.; Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 1263-1266.
53. The p term introduced here is equivalent to the concept of the "reduction in the solid angle corresponding to reactive encounters" as originally formulated by Kowalak et al. [Kowalak, A.; Kustin, K.; Pasternack, R. F.; Petrucci, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 3126-3130.]
54. -) [ref 41] and the monoprotonated species of N,N′-diethylethylenediamine [ref 50], viz., 0.006 per available donor atom [cf., ref 27].
55. (a) Melson, G. A.; Wilkins, R. G. J. Chem. Soc. 1962, 4208-4213.
56. (b) Bulmer, R. S.; Caldin, E. F.; Walton, A. W. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1971, 67, 3343-3356.
57. Turan, T. S.; Rorabacher, D. B. Inorg. Chem. 1972, 11, 288-295.