Evaluating “payback” on biomedical research

BMJ

Volumn 321, Issue 7260, 2000, Pages 566-

  Chalmers, Iain ^a   Grant, Jonathan ^d   Cottrell, Robert ^b   Fawcett, Gail ^b   Cluzeau, Françoise ^c  

^a UK COCHRANE CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^c ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA BASE; HEALTH PROGRAM; LETTER; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FINANCIAL AUDIT; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; RESEARCH SUPPORT;

EID: 0034596523     PISSN: 09598138     EISSN: 14685833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.321.7260.566     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. Grant J, Cottrell R, Cluzeau F, Fawcett G. Evaluating “payback” on biomedical research from papers cited in clinical guidelines: applied bibliometric study. BMJ 2000; 320: 1107-1111. (22 April.)
2. Clarke M, Chalmers I. Discussion sections in reports of controlled trials published in general medical journals: islands in search of continents? JAMA 1998; 280: 280-282.