Daphnezomines F and G: Novel alkaloids with 1-azabicyclo[5.2.2]undecane moiety from Daphniphyllum humile

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 65, Issue 11, 2000, Pages 3558-3562

  Morita, Hiroshi ^a   Yoshida, Naotoshi ^a   Kobayashi, Jun'ichi ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALKALOID DERIVATIVE; DAPHNEZOMINE F; DAPHNEZOMINE G; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DRUG ISOLATION; DRUG STRUCTURE; NONHUMAN; NOTE; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

ALKALOIDS; ANIMALS; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS, PHYTOGENIC; DRUG SCREENING ASSAYS, ANTITUMOR; HUMANS; KB CELLS; LEUKEMIA L1210; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MICE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PLANTS, MEDICINAL; TUMOR CELLS, CULTURED;

EID: 0034595592     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo000004m     Document Type: Note

References (31)

1. For reviews of the Daphniphyllum alkaloids, see: (a) Yamamura, S.; Hirata, Y. In The Alkaloids; Manske, R. H. F., Ed., Academic Press: New York, 1975; Vol. 15, p 41. (b) Yamamura, S. In The Alkaloids; Brossi, A., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1986; Vol. 29, p 265.
2. For reviews of the Daphniphyllum alkaloids, see: (a) Yamamura, S.; Hirata, Y. In The Alkaloids; Manske, R. H. F., Ed., Academic Press: New York, 1975; Vol. 15, p 41. (b) Yamamura, S. In The Alkaloids; Brossi, A., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1986; Vol. 29, p 265.
3. (a) Hao, X.; Zhou, J.; Node, M.; Fuji, K. Yunnan Zhiwu Yanjiu 1993, 15, 205-207.
4. (b) Arbain, D.; Byrne, L. T.; Cannon, J. R.; Patrick, V. A.; White, A. H. Aust. J. Chem. 1990, 43, 185-190.
5. (c) Yamamura, S.; Lamberton, J. A.; Niwa, M., Endo, K.; Hirata, Y. Chem. Lett. 1980, 393-396.
6. (d) Yamamura, S.; Toda, M.; Hirata, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1976, 49, 839.
7. (e) Yamamura, S.; Lamberton, J. A.; Irikawa, H.; Okumura, Y.; Hirata, Y. Chem. Lett. 1975, 923-926.
8. (f) Yamamura, S.; Irikawa, H.; Okumura, Y.; Hirata, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1975, 48, 2120-2123.
9. (g) Yamamura, S.; Hirata, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 42, 3673-3676.
10. (h) Yamamura, S.; Sasaki, K.; Toka, M.; Hirata, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974, 2023-2026, and references therein.
11. (a) Heathcock, C. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1996, 93, 14323-14327.
12. (b) Heathcock, C. H.; Joe, D. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1131-1142.
13. (c) Heathcock, C. H.; Kath, J. C.; Ruggeri, R. B. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 1120-1130.
14. (d) Heathcock, C. H. Angew. Chem. 1992, 104, 675-691.
15. (e) Heathcock, C. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1992, 31, 665-681, and references therein.
16. Morita, H.; Yoshida, N.; Kobayashi, J. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 7208-7212.
17. Morita, H.; Yoshida, N.; Kobayashi, J. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 12549-12556.
18. In the previous study, yuzurimine as a major alkaloid, and secodaphniphylline, daphniteijsmine, deoxyyuzurimine, and isodaphnilactone-B as minor ones have been isolated from D. humile: Yamamura, S.; Terada, Y. Chem. Lett. 1976, 1381-1382.
19. (a) Xiao, P.; Kubo, H.; Komiya, H.; Higashiyama, K.; Yan, Y.; Li, J.-S.; Ohmiya, S. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1999, 47, 448-450.
20. (b) Rudi, A.; Kashman, Y., J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 5331-5337.
21. (c) Tempesta, M. S.; Corley, D. G.; Beutler, J. A.; Metral, C. J.; Yunes, R. A.; Giacomozzi, C. A.; Calixto, J. B. J. Nat. Prod. 1988, 51, 617-618.
22. (d) Murakoshi, I.; Kidoguchi, E.; Nakamura, M.; Haginiwa, J.; Ohmiya, S.; Higashiyama, K.; Otomasu, H. Phytochemistry 1981, 20, 1725-1730.
23. (e) Hart, N. K.; Johns, S. R.; Lamberton, J. A. Aust. J. Chem. 1968, 21, 1619-1624.
24. -1: Hall, H. K.; Zbinden, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 6428-6432.
25. Monte Carlo simulation and molecular mechanics calculations were conducted by Macromodel program: Mohamadi, F.; Richards, N. G. J.; Guida, W. C.; Liskamp, R.; Lipton, M.; Caufield, C.; Chang, G.; Hendrickson, T.; Still, W. C. J, Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 440-467.
26. Broad signals of H-2b, H-3a, H-4, H-19, and H-21 located at or near the 1-azabicyclo[5.2.2]undecane ring at 300 K were changed to fairly sharp ones at 250 K.
27. H 2.34 and 4.26; this difference may be due to the presence of the carbonyl group at C-7.
28. H 3.32 and 3.28, respectively) were very close to each other.
29. Halgren, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4710-4723.
30. 15 for 2a belonging to the major cluster, were consistent with the NOESY data and the proton coupling (6.4 Hz) observed.
31. 3)-H system in the Macromodel program: Haasnoot, C. A. G.; de Leeuw, F. A. A. M.; Altona, C. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 2783-2792.