A bandwidth analysis of reliable multicast transport protocols

Second International Workshop on Networked Group Communcation (NGC 2000)

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 15-26

  Maihöfer, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

AAK; Receiver initiated; Sender initiated; Tree based

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH; COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; TREES (MATHEMATICS);

MULTICAST TRANSPORT PROTOCOLS;

MULTICASTING;

EID: 0034593040     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/354644.354647     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. S. Floyd, V. Jacobson, C. Liu, S. McCanne, and L. Zhang. A reliable multicast framework for light-weight sessions and application level framing. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 5(6):784-803, Dec. 1997.
2. S. Kasera, J. Kurose, and D. Towsley. A comparison of server-based and receiver-based local recovery approaches for scalable reliable multicast. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'98, pages 988-995, New York, Apr. 1998. IEEE.
3. B. Levine and J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. A comparison of reliable multicast protocols. ACM Multimedia Systems, 6(5):334-348, Sept. 1998.
4. B. Levine, D. Lavo, and J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves. The case for reliable concurrent multicasting using shared ack trees. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Multimedia Conference (MULTIMEDIA'96), pages 365-376, New York, Nov. 1996. ACM Press.
5. C. Maihöfer, K. Rothermel, and N. Mantei. A throughput analysis of reliable multicast transport protocols. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, New York, Oct. 2000. IEEE.
6. J. Normenmacher, M. Lacher, M. Jung, G. Carl, and E. Biersack. How bad is reliable multicast without local recovery. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM'98, pages 972-979, New York, Apr. 1998. IEEE.
7. S. Paul, K. Sabnani, J. Lin, and S. Bhattacharyya. Reliable multicast transport protocol (RMTP). IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, special issue on Network Support for Multipoint Communication, 15(3):407-421, Apr. 1997.
8. S. Pingali, D. Towsley, and J. F. Kurose. A comparison of sender-initiated and receiver-initiated reliable multicast protocols. In Proceedings of the Sigmetrics Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, pages 221-230, New York, May 1994. ACM Press.
9. G. Poo and A. Goscinski. Performance comparison of sender-based and receiver-based reliable multicast protocols. Computer Communications, 21(7):597-605, June 1998.
10. K. Rothermel and C. Maihöfer. A robust and efficient mechanism for constructing multicast acknowledgment trees. In Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, pages 139-145, New York, Oct. 1999. IEEE.
11. T. Speakman, D. Farinacci, S. Lin, and A. Tweedly. PGM reliable transport protocol specification. Internet draft , work in progress, 2000.
12. T. W. Strayer, B. J. Dempsey, and A. C. Weaver. XTP - The Xpress transfer protocol. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1992.
13. B. Whetten and G. Taskale. An overview of the reliable multicast transport protocol II. IEEE Network, 14(1):37-47, Feb. 2000.
14. R. Yavatkar, J. Griffioen, and M. Sudan. A reliable dissemination protocol for interactive collaborative applications. In The Third ACM International Multimedia Conference and Exhibition (MULTIMEDIA '95), pages 333-344, New York, Nov. 1996. ACM Press.