Action research to improve the pre-registration midwifery curriculum Part 2: Case study evaluation in seven sites in England

Midwifery

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 277-286

  Fraser, Diane M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; LICENSING; METHODOLOGY; MIDWIFE; MODEL; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; STANDARD; UNITED KINGDOM;

CURRICULUM; ENGLAND; HUMANS; LICENSURE, NURSING; MIDWIFERY; MODELS, NURSING; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; RESEARCH DESIGN; STUDENTS, NURSING;

EID: 0034585890     PISSN: 02666138     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/midw.2000.0227     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Atkinson P, Delamont S 1985 Bread and dreams or bread and circuses? In: Shipman M (ed) Educational Research: Principles, Policies & Practices. The Falmer Press, Lewes
2. Bassey M 1984 Pedagogic research: on the relative merits of searching for generalisation and study of single events. In: Bell J (ed) Conducting small-scale investigation in educational management. Harper and Row, London
3. Bedford H, Philips T, Robinson J, Schostak J 1993 Assessing competence in nursing and midwifery education and training. English National Board for Nursing Midwifery and Health Visiting, London
4. Department of Health 1993 Changing childbirth: Report of the Expert Maternity Group. HMSO, London
5. EC Midwives Directive 1980 EC Council Directive 80/ 155/EEC, Article 4. Official Journal of the European Communities, Brussels
6. Eraut M 1994 Developing professional knowledge and competence. The Falmer Press, London
7. Fraser DM 1994 Evaluation of the non-midwifery placements in a three year pre-registration midwifery education programme. MPhil, University of Nottingham, Nottingham
8. Fraser DM 1996 Pre-registration midwifery programmes: a case study evaluation of the non-midwifery placements. Midwifery 12: 16-22
9. Fraser DM 1999 Women's perceptions of midwifery care: a longitudinal study to inform curriculum development. Birth, Issues in Perinatal Care 26: 99-107
10. Fraser DM 2000 Active research to improve the preregistration midwifery curriculum part 1: an appropriate methodology, Midwifery 16 (3): 213-221
11. Fraser DM, Murphy RJL, Worth-Butler M 1996 Developing a model of competence in midwifery. British Journal of Midwifery 4: 576-580
12. Fraser D, Murphy R, Worth-Butler M 1997 An outcome evaluation of the effectiveness of pre-registration midwifery programmes of education. English National Board for Nursing Midwifery and Health Visiting, London
13. Glaser B, Strauss A 1967 The discovery of grounded theory. Aldine, New York
14. Guba EG, Lincoln YS 1989 Fourth generation evaluation. Sage, Newbury Park CA
15. Hamilton D 1980 Some contrasting assumptions about case study research and survey analysis. In: Simons H (ed) Towards a science of the singular. CARE, Norwich
16. Ilott I, Murphy R 1997 Feelings and failing in professional training: the assessors' dilemma. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 22: 307-316
17. Kent J, MacKeith N, Maggs C 1993 An evaluation of preregistration midwifery in england. Department of Health, Maggs Research Associates, Bath
18. MacDonald B, Walker R 1977 Case study and the social philosophy of educational research. In: Hamilton D, Jenkins D, King C et al. (eds.) Beyond the numbers game: a reader in educational evaluation. McCutchan Publishing, New York
19. Maggs C, Rapport F 1995 Getting a job and growing in confidence. Department of Health, London
20. McNiff L 1988 Action research: principles and practice. Macmillan Education, London
21. Mitchell DE, Kerchner CT 1983 Collective bargaining and teacher policy. In: Shulman LS, Sykes G (eds.) Handbook of Teaching and Policy. Longman, New York
22. Norris N 1990 Understanding educational evaluation. Kogan Page, London
23. Schon DA 1983 The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York
24. Smith JK 1989 The nature of social and educational inquiry: empiricism versus interpretation. Ablex, Norwood, NJ
25. Stake RE 1975 Evaluating the arts in education: a responsive approach. Merrill, Columbus, OH
26. United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing Midwifery and Health Visiting 1998 Midwives rules and code of practice. UKCC, London
27. Winter R 1987 Action research and the nature of social inquiry: professional innovation and educational work. Gower Publishing, London
28. Worth-Butler M, Fraser DM, Murphy RJ 1996 Eliciting the views of experienced midwives about the assessment of competence in midwifery. Midwifery 12: 182-190
29. Worth-Butler M, Murphy R, Fraser D 1995 Recognising competence in midwifery. British Journal of Midwifery 3: 259-262
30. Worth-Butler M, Murphy RJL, Fraser DM 1994 Towards an integrated model of competence in midwifery. Midwifery 10: 225-231
31. Yin RK 1994 Case study research - design and methods. Sage, London