|
Volumn 57, Issue , 2000, Pages 425-429
|
Comparison of postlingually deafened adults using the SPEAK and CIS coding strategies.
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
COCHLEA PROSTHESIS;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
EVALUATION;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HEARING IMPAIRMENT;
HUMAN;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PHONETICS;
PROSTHESIS;
SPEECH AUDIOMETRY;
ADULT;
AGED;
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS;
DEAFNESS;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PHONETICS;
PROSTHESIS DESIGN;
SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS;
MLCS;
MLOWN;
|
EID: 0034585585
PISSN: 00653071
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1159/000059196 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (0)
|