Commentary: A blatant misuse of power?

Birth

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 264-265

  Gamble, Jenny A ^a   Creedy, Debra K ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; CESAREAN SECTION; CYSTOCELE; ELECTIVE SURGERY; GENDER; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LABOR COMPLICATION; LUNG FLUID; NOTE; NURSE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT EDUCATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTOCELE; RISK; TACHYPNEA; TREATMENT INDICATION; UNITED STATES; VAGINAL DELIVERY; FEMALE; INFORMED CONSENT; LABOR; MEDICAL ETHICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

CESAREAN SECTION; ETHICS, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE;

EID: 0034582941     PISSN: 07307659     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2000.00264.x     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Patient choice cesarean
2. The Green Bay Cesarean Section Study I. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates
3. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury
4. Women's request for cesarean section: A critique of the literature