Combining independent p values: Extensions of the Stouffer and binomial methods

Psychological Methods

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 496-515

  Darlington, Richard B ^a   Hayes, Andrew F ^b  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOMETRY;

BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOMETRICS;

EID: 0034577724     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.5.4.496     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Becker, B. J. (1987). Applying tests of combined significance in meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 164-171.
2. Becker, B. J. (1994). Combining significance levels. In H. Cooper & L. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 215-230). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
3. Begg, C. B. (1994). Publication bias. In H. Cooper & L. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 399-409). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
4. Brozek, J., & Tiede, K. (1952). Reliable and questionable significance in a series of statistical tests. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 339-341.
5. Darlington, R. B. (1980). Another peek in the file drawers. Unpublished manuscript, Cornell University.
6. Darlington, R. B. (1990). Regression and linear models. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Dickerson, K. (1997). How important is publication bias?: A synthesis of available data. AIDS Education and Prevention, 9(Supplement A), 15-21.
8. Fisher, R. A. (1938). Statistical methods for research workers (7th ed.). London: Oliver & Boyd.
9. Glass, G., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10. Hedges, L., & Olkin, I. (1980). Vote-counting methods in research synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 359-369.
11. Hunt, M. (1997). How science takes stock: The story of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
12. Iyengar, S., & Greenhouse, J. B. (1988). Selection models and the file drawer problem. Statistical Science, 3, 109-117.
13. Jones, L. V., & Fiske, D. W. (1953). Models for testing the significance of combined results. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 375-382.
14. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1990). Applied linear statistical models. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
15. Rosenthal, R. (1978). Combining results of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 185-193.
16. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
17. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park: CA: Sage.
18. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A., & Williams, R. M., Jr. (1949). The American soldier: Adjustment during army life (Vol. 1). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Strube, M. J., & Miller, R. H. (1986). Comparison of power rates for combined probability procedures: A simulation study. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 407-415.
20. Thomas, H. (1985). On the "file drawer" problem. Unpublished manuscript, Pennsylvania State University.
21. Wilkinson, B. (1951). A statistical consideration in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 48, 156-158.
22. Winer, B. J. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.