A loss-effectiveness analysis of risk-adapted surveillance after colorectal polypectomy

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 77, Issue , 2000, Pages 395-398

  Mansmann, Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; DISEASES; MONITORING; RISK ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TUMORS;

COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FOLLOW UP; MODELLING TECHNIQUES;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADENOMATOUS POLYP; AFTERCARE; ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; RISK; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

ADENOMATOUS POLYPS; AFTERCARE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; GERMANY; HUMANS; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RISK;

EID: 0034577173     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-921-9-395     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. Hermanek P (1995) Diagnosttk und Neachbeobachtung bei Pattenten mii nichtfamiliaren kolorektalen Polypen, Klinikarzt, i/z/24, 42-43.
2. Zauber AG, Winawre SJ iyy 7) Initial management and follow-up of patients with colorectal adenomas, Gasteroenterol Clin North AM, 26, 85-101.
3. Nusko G et al. (1998) Risk-related surveillance of patients with colorectal adenomas, Gastroenterology
4. Hermanek P et al. (2000) The German Experience, the surgeon as a prognostic fetor, Surgical Oncol tnn of iNorm AM, 9, jo-49. pj j-oni AJVL et al. (lysoj L-olorectal polyps and the nsk of subsequent carcinoma, Mayo viin Proc, oi, 337-343
5. Spiegelhalter, D., Thomas, A., and Best, N. (1998). WinBUGS user manual Version 1. 1. 1