PubMed, internet grateful med, and ovid: A comparison of three MEDLINE internet interfaces

Medical Reference Services Quarterly

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 1-13

  De Groote, Sandy L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

End user searching; Interface evaluation; MEDLINE

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EVALUATION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; MEDLINE; UNITED STATES;

INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; MEDLINE; UNITED STATES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 0034576961     PISSN: 02763869     EISSN: 15409597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J115v19n04_01     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Hansen, M. A. “Free Online Access to Medical Information: MEDLINE Web Interfaces.” Health Care on the Internet 2(1998): 20-43.
2. Davies, K.J., Gault, L.V., and Shultz, M.G. “Variations in MeSH Mapping.” Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Chapter Medical Library Association, Grand Rapids, Michigan October 1999.
3. Walker, C.J., McKibbon, K.A., Haynes, R.B., and Ramsden, F. “Problems Encountered by Clinical End Users of MEDLINE and GRATEFUL MED.” Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 79(January 1991): 67-9.
4. Delozier, Eric P., and Lingle, V.A. “MEDLINE and MeSH: Challenges for End Users.” Medical Reference Services Quarterly 11(Fall 1992):29-46.