Autonomy and the psychiatric patient

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 59-70

  Matthews, Eric ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; ILLNESS BEHAVIOR; INFORMED CONSENT; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES; MENTAL PATIENT; PATERNALISM; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH; PHILOSOPHY; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

MENTAL HEALTH THERAPIES; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

COERCION; COMMITMENT OF MENTALLY ILL; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MENTAL COMPETENCY; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTALLY ILL PERSONS; PATERNALISM; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHILOSOPHY; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

EID: 0034575418     PISSN: 02643758     EISSN: 14685930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5930.00140     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Phil Fennell (1996) Treatment without Consent: Law, psychiatry and the treatment of mentally disordered people since 1845, London, Routledge.
2. Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress (1994) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Fourth Edition, New York/Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 125.
3. Kant, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, 4:440
4. Mary Gregor, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1997, p. 47.
5. Kant, Groundwork, 4:421-2, Gregor translation, pp. 31-2.
6. John Stuart Mill, On Liberty and Other Essays, Oxford, Oxford University Press (Oxford World’s Classics), 1998, p. 17.