Within-subject comparison of maxillary long-bar implant-retained prostheses with and without palatal coverage: Patient-based outcomes

Clinical Oral Implants Research

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 555-565

  De Albuquerque Jr , Rubens Ferreira ^a   Lund, James P ^a,b   Tang, Ling ^b   Larivée, Jacinthe ^b   De Grandmont, Pierre ^b   Gauthier, Gilles ^b   Feine, Jocelyne S ^a,c  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Dental implants; Maxillary prostheses; Overdentures; Patient satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MASTICATION; MASTICATORY MUSCLE; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CONCEPT; SPEECH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE RETENTION; DENTURE, COMPLETE, LOWER; DENTURE, COMPLETE, UPPER; DENTURE, OVERLAY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FOOD HABITS; HUMANS; MALE; MASTICATION; MASTICATORY MUSCLES; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SELF CONCEPT; SPEECH; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034572491     PISSN: 09057161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006555.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Adell, R., Eriksson, B., Lekholm, U, Brånemark P.-I. & Jemt, T. (1990) A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the totally edentulous jaw. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 5: 347-359.
2. Awad, M.A. & Feine, J.S. (1998) Measuring patient satisfaction with mandibular prostheses. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 26: 400-405.
3. Awad, M.A., Lund, J.P., Clokie, C.M.L., Dufresne, E. & Feine, J.S. (1997) Factors that affect patient's general satisfaction with mandibular prostheses. Journal of Dental Research 76(special issue): 2103.
4. Awad, M.A., Lund, J.P., Dufresne, E., Clokie, C.M.L. & Feine, J.S. (1999) Comparing mandibular implant overdentures with conventional dentures. Journal of Dental Research 78: 133 (Abstract).
5. Barber, H.D., Scott, R.F., Maxson, B.B. & Fonseca, R.J. (1990) Evaluation of anterior maxillary alveolar ridge resorption when opposed by the transmandibular implant. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 48: 1283-1287.
6. Brånemark, P.-I., Hansson, B.O., Adell, R., Breine, U, Lindström, J., Hallèn, O. & Öhman, A. (1977) Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 11(suppl 16): 1-132.
7. Burns, D.R., Unger, J.W., Elswick, R.K. & Beck D.A. (1995a) Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: Part I - Retention, stability, and tissue response. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 73: 354-363.