Continuous Practice and Advanced Training in Interventional Cardiology. Recommendations for the Assessment and Maintenance of Proficiency in Interventional Cardiology. a Statement for Physicians and Advanced Training Units from the Section of Hemodynamics and Interventional Cardiology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology;Práctica continuada y enseñanza avanzada en cardiología intervencionista. Recomendaciones de la Sección de Hemodinámica y Cardiología Intervencionista de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología para la capacitación y recapacitación de cardiólogos intervencionistas y unidades de formación

Revista Espanola de Cardiologia

Volumn 53, Issue 12, 2000, Pages 1613-1625

  Fernández Avilés, Francisco ^a   Alonso Martin, Joaquín ^b   Augé Sanpera, José María ^b   García Fernández, Eulogio ^b   Macaya De Miguel, Carlos ^b   Melgares Moreno, Rafael ^b   Valdés Chavarri, Mariano ^b  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNICO UNIVERSITARIO DE VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cardiac catheterization; Coronary angioplasty; Guidelines; Interventional cardiology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIOLOGY; EDUCATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; SPAIN; STANDARD;

CARDIOLOGY; HUMANS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SPAIN;

EID: 0034571406     PISSN: 03008932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0300-8932(00)75287-0     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Osborne D, Gaebler T. El Gobierno inspirado en el cliente: satisfacer las necesidades del cliente, no las de la burocracia. En: Osborne D, editor. La Reinvención del Gobierno (ed. esp.). Barcelona: Ediciones Paidós, 1994: 241-276.
2. Parmley WW, Passamani ER, Lo B. 29th Bethesda Conference: Ethics in Cardiovascular Medicine (1997). J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 917-925.
3. Hirshfeld JW, Forrester JS, from the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. American College of Cardiology Training Statement on Recomendations for the Structure of an Optimal Adult Interventional Cardiology Training Program. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. Endorsed by the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions and the Diagnostic and Interventional Catheterization Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 2141-2147.
4. Parmley WW. Interventional Cardiology. An added qualification to the Cardiovascular Board. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 716-717.
5. Alpert J, Fuster V, Babb JD, Chaitman BR, Cheitlin MD, Conti CR et al. Guidelines for training in Adult Cardiovascular Medicine. Core Cardiology Symposium J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 1-34.
6. th Bethesda Conference Report: Practice Guidelines and Quality of Care. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 1125-1179.
7. The Executive Committee of the European Board for the Speciality of Cardiology. Recomendations of the European Board (EBSC) for the education and training in basic cardiology in Europe. Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 996-1000.
8. Kimmel S, Berlin JA, Laskey WK. The relatioship between coronary angioplasty procedure volume and major complications. JAMA 1995; 274: 1137-1142.
9. Topol E, Califf RM. Quality of care in cardiovascular medicine. En: Topol E editor. Textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Filadelfia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1998; 1113-1114.
10. Mark DB. Medical Economics in Cardiovascular Medicine. En: Topol E. editor. Textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Filadelfia: Lippincott-Riven Publishers, 1998; 1033-1062.
11. Zimmerman D. Heart surgeons rated. State reveals patient-mortality records. Newsday 1991; 18: 34.
12. Pettijohn TL, Lawrence M. The impact of outcomes data reporting on access to health care of high-risk patients to interventional cardiologists in the United States. J Invas Cardiol 1999; 11: 111-115.
13. Cowley MJ, Faxon DP, Holmes DR. Guidelines for training, credentialling, and maintenance of competence for the performance of coronary angioplasty: a report from the interventional cardiology committee and the training program standards committee of the Society of Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc Diag 1993; 30: 1-4.
14. Parker DJ, Gray HH, Balcon R, Birkhead JS, Boyle RM, Hutton I et al. Planning for coronary angioplasty: guidelines for training and continous competence. British Cardiac Society (BCS) and British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) Working Group on Interventional Cadiology. Heart 1996; 75: 419-425.
15. Hirshfeld JW, Ellis SG, Faxon DP, Block P, Carver JR, Douglas JS et al. Recommendations for the assessment and maintenance of proficiency in coronary interventional procedures. Statement of the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 722-743.
16. Unger F. Worldwide survey on cardiac interventions 1995. Report of the European Heart Institute of the European Academy of Science and Arts. Cor Europeaeum 1999; 7: 128-146.
17. Soriano J. Alfonso F, Cequier C, Morís C. Registro de Actividad de la Sección de Hemodinámica y Cardiología Intervencionista del año 1999. Rev Esp Cardiol 2000; 53: 1626-1638.
18. Meyer B, Meier B, Bonzel J, Fabian J, Heyndrickx G, Morice M-C et al, for the Working Group on Coronary Circulation of the European Society of Cardiology. Interventional Cardiology in Europe 1993. Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 1318-1328.
19. Maynard C, Chapko MK, Every NR, Martin DC, Ritchie JL. Coronary angioplasty in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Am J Cardiol 1998; 81: 848-852.
20. EPISTENT Investigators. Randomized placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade. Lancet 1998; 9122: 87-92.
21. Kent KM, Bentivoglio LG, Block PC, Cowley MJ, Dorros G, Gosselin AJ et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: report from the registry of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Am J Cardiol 1982; 49: 2011-2020.
22. Detre K, Holubkov R, Kelsey S, Cowley M, Kent K, Williams D et al. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 1985-1986 and 1977-1981: the National Heart, Lung, and Bood Institute Registry. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 265-270.
23. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, DiSciascio G, Deligonul U, Topol EJ et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary artery disease: implications for patient selection (Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group). Circulation 1990; 82: 1193-1202.
24. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 217-225.
25. st Scientific Sesions of the American Heart Association. Dallas, noviembre de 1998.
26. st Scientific Sesions of the American Heart Association. Dallas, noviembre de 1998.
27. Hannan EL, Racz M, Ryan TJ, McCallister BD, Johnson LW, Arani DT et al. Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists. JAMA 1997; 277: 892-898.
28. Altmann DB, Racz M, Battelman DS, Bergman G, Spokojny A, Hannan E et al. Reduction in angioplasty complication after the introduction of coronary stents: results from a consecutive series of 2242 patients. Am Heart J 1996; 132: 503-507.
29. Weintraub WS, McKay CR, Riner RN, Ellis SG, Frommer PL, Carmichael DB et al. The American College of Cardiology National Database: progress and challenges. American College of Cardiology Database Committee. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 459-465.
30. Hilder FJ. Complications of Cardiac Cateheterization and Strategies to Reduce Risk. En: Pepine CJ, Hill JA, Lambert CR, editores. Diagnosis and therapeutic cardiac catheterization. Baltimore: Willians & Wilkins, Baltimore 1994; 72-89.
31. Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Strom BL, Laskey WE, for the Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Development and validation of a simplified predictive index for major complications in contemporary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty practice. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 931-938.
32. García E, Elízaga J, Pérez-Castellano N, Serrano JA, Soriano J, Abeytua M et al. Primary angioplasty versus systemic thrombolysis in anterior myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 605-611.
33. Wharton TP Jr, McNamara NS, Fedele FA, Jacobs MI, Gladstone AR, Funk EJ. Primary angioplasty for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: experience at two community hospitals without cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 33: 1266-1268.
34. Llorens R, Cortina J, Revuelta JM. Cirugía Cardiovascular en Espana en el año 1994. Registro de Intervenciones de la Sociedad Española de Cirugía Cardiovascular (SECCV). Rev Esp Cardiol 1996; 49: 627-637.
35. Kosuga K, Tamai H, Ueda K, Hsu YS, Kawashima A, Tanaka S et al. Initial and long-term results of angioplasty in unprotected left main coronary artery. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 32-37.
36. Karam C, Fajadet J, Cassagneau B, Lauret JP, Jordan C, Laborde JC et al. Results of stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in patients at high surgical risk. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 975-978.
37. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, DiSciascio G, Deligonul U, Topol EJ et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedure outcome with angioplasty for patients with multivessel coronary disease: implications for patients selection (Multivessel Angioplasty Pronostic Study). Circulation 1990; 82: 1193-1202.
38. Barsness GW, Peterson ED, Ohman EM, Nelson CL, DeLong ER, Reves JG et al. Relationship between diabetes mellitus and long-term survival after coronary bypass and angioplasty. Circulation 1997; 96: 2551-2556.
39. Mori M, Kurogane H, Hayashi T, Yasaka Y, Ohta S, Kajiya T et al. Comparison of results of intracoronary implantation of the Palmaz-Schatz stem with conventional balloon angioplasty in chronic total coronary arterial occlusion. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 78: 985-989.
40. Holmes DR Jr, Topol EJ, Califf RM, Berdan LG. Leya F, Berger PB et al. A multicenter, randomized trial of coronary angioplasty versus directional atherectomy for patients with saphenous vein bypass graft lesions. CAVEAT-II Investigators Circulation 1995; 91: 1966-1974.
41. Holmes DR Jr, Reeder GS, Ghazzal ZM, Bresnahan JF, King SB, Leon MB et al. Coronary perforation after excimer laser coronary angioplasty: the Excimer Laser Coronary Angioplasty Registry experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 330-335.
42. Erbel R, Haude M, Höpp HW, Franzen D, Rupprecht HJ, Heublein B et al, for the Restenosis Stent Study Group. Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1672-1678.
43. George BS, Voorhees WD III, Roubin GS, Fearnot NE, Pinkerton CA, Raizner AE et al. Multicenter investigation of coronary stenting to treat acute or threatened closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: clinical and angiographic outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 135-143.
44. Ramsdale DR, Mushahwar SS, Morris JL. Repair of coronary artery perforation after rotastenting by implantation of the JoStent covered stent. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998; 45: 310-313.
45. Mainar V, PicóAracil F, Bordes P, Ruiz Ros JA, Campos Peris JV. Marín F. Extraccíon percutanea de cuerpos extraños intravasculares: una serie de 28 casos. Rev Esp Cardiol 1996; 49: 41-47.
46. Randomized placebo-controlled trial of abciximab before and during coronary intervention in refractory unstable angina: the CAPTURE Study. Lancet 1997; 349: 1429-1435.
47. Macaya C, Serruys PW, Ruygrok P, Suryapranata H, Mast G, Klugmann S et al. Continued benefit of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty: one-year clinical follow-up of Benestent trial. Benestent Study Group. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 255-261.
48. Baim DS, Cutlip DE, Sharma SK, Ho KK, Fortuna R, Schreiber TL et al. Final results of the Balloon vs Optimal Atherectomy Trial. Circulation 1998; 97: 322-331.
49. a ed.). Filadelfia: Saunders Company, 1994; 539-548.
50. Hausmann D, Erbel R, Alibelli-Chemarin MJ, Boksch W, Caracciolo E, Cohn JM et al. Safety of intravascular ultrasound examination: a multicenter survey of 2207 examinations. Circulation 1995; 91: 623-630.
51. Hamad N, Pichard AD, Lyle HR, Lindsay J Jr. A serial trial results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by multiple, relatively low frequency operators: 1986-1987 experience. Am J Cardio 1988; 61: 1229-1231.
52. Shook TL, Sun GW, Burstein S, Eisenhauer AC, Matthews RV. Comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty outcome and hospitals costs for low-volume and high-volume operators. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 331-336.
53. Ronald J, Krone RJ, George W, Vetrovec GW, Noto TJ, Lewisw et al. PTCA operator variability: procedure complexity and outcome from the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions [resumen]. Circulation 1993; 88 (Supl 1): 300.
54. Bon Tempo CP, Sheber HS, Sheridan M. Relation of low, moderate, high volume PTCA operators and outcomes [resumen]. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995; 35: 79.
55. Klein LW, Schaer GL, Calvin JE, Palvas B, Allen J, Loew J et al. Does low individual operator coronary interventional procedural volume correlate with worse institutional procedureal outcome? J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 870-877.
56. Ellis SG, Weintraub W, Holmes D, Shaw R, Block PC, King SB III. Relation of operator volume and experience to procedural outcome of percutaneous coronary revascularization at hospitals with high interventional volumes. Circulation 1997; 95: 2479-2484.
57. O'Neill WW, Griffin JJ, Stone G, Brodie B, Jomes DE, Sachs D et al. Operator and institutional volume do not affect the procedural outcome of primary angioplasty therapy [resumen]. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27 (Supl A): 13A.
58. Jollis JG, Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Mark DB, Collins SR, Muhlbaier LH et al. The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1625-1629.
59. McGrath P, Malenka F, Wennber D. Operator volume and outcomes in 12899 percutaneous coronary interventions J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 570-576.
60. Jollis JG, Peterson ED, Nelson CL, Stafford JA, DeLong ER, Mulbaier LH et al. Relationship between physician and hospital coronary angioplasty volume and outcome in elederly patients. Circulation 1997; 95: 2485-2491.
61. Richie JL, Phillips KA, Luft HS. Coronary angioplasty: statewide experience in California. Circulation 1993; 88: 2735-2743.
62. Dehmer GJ, Arani D, Noto T, Scanlon P, Hilder F, Clark D et al, and Members of the Laboratory Survey Committee. Lessons learned from the review of cardiac catheterization laboratories: a report form the Laboratory Survey Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 1999; 46: 24-31.
63. Cequier A, Esplugas E, Martín de Dios R, Sobrino N. Recursos y utillaje en Hemodinámica y Cardiología Intervencionista. En: Normas de Actuación de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología. Sociedad Española de Cardiologia, 1996; 175-180.
64. Heupler FA, Al-Hani AJ, Dear WE, and Member of the Laboratory Performance Standards Committee of the Societey for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. Guidelines for continuous quality improvement in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993; 30: 191-200.
65. Hartz AJ, Kuhn EM, Kayser KL, Pryor DP, Green R, Rimm AA. Assessing providers of coronary revascularization: a method for peer review organ izations. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 1631-1640.
66. Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Laskey WK. The relationship between coronary angioplasty procedure volume and major complications. JAMA 1995; 274: 1137-1142.
67. GUSTO (II-b) Angioplasty Substudy Group. The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes: a clinical trial compparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1621-1628.
68. Kato NS, Carter GM. Volume-mortality trade off for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the United States [resumen]. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27(Supl A): 13A.
69. Tiefenbrunn AJ, Chandra NC, French WJ, Gore JM, Rogers WJ. Clinicall experience with primary PTCA compared with alteplase (rt-PA) in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a report from the Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI 2). J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31: 1240-1245.
70. Zahn R, Vogt A, Neuhaus KL, Schuster S, Setiges J. Angioplasty in acute inyocardial infarction in clinical practice: results in 4265 patients fron the ALKK angioplasty registry [resumen]. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29 (Supl A): 15A.
71. Canto JG, Every NR, Magid DJ, Rogers WJ, Malmgren JA ,Frederik PD et al, for the National Registry of Myocardial Infraction 2 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1573-1580.
72. Malenka DJ, McGrath PD, Wennberg DE, Ryan TJ, Kellet MA, Shubrooks SJ et al. The relationship between operator volume and outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in high-volume hospitals in 1994-1996. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34: 1471-1480.
73. Hannan EL. Percutaneous coronary interventions: heed the American College of Cardiology volume recommendations, but strive to improve quality. J Am Coll Csrdiol 1999; 34: 1481-1483.