A kantian argument for a duty to donate one’s own organs. A reply to Nicole Gerrand

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 93-101

  Merle, Jean Christophe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; ARTICLE; BODY PARTS AND FLUIDS; CADAVER; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; DONOR; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; LIVING DONOR; MORAL POLICY; MORALITY; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH; PHILOSOPHY; REMUNERATION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BODY PARTS AND FLUIDS; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; MORAL POLICY; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH; REMUNERATION;

CADAVER; COMMERCE; ETHICS; HUMAN; LIVING DONORS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; ORGAN PROCUREMENT; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHILOSOPHY; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 0034570994     PISSN: 02643758     EISSN: 14685930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-5930.00143     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Nicole Gerrand (1999) The misuse of Kant in the debate about a market for human body parts, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 16, 1.
2. Immanuel Kant [1797] (1996) Doctrine of Right in Practical Philosophy, trans. M. J. Gregor, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), p. 391.
3. Immanuel Kant [1797] (1996) Doctrine of Right in Practical Philosophy, trans. M. J. Gregor, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), Appendix 5, p. 498.
4. Immanuel Kant [1797] (1996) Doctrine of Right in Practical Philosophy, trans. M. J. Gregor, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), §49E, p. 475.
5. GERRAND, Doctrine of Right in Practical Philosophy, trans. M. J. Gregor, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), p. 64.
6. GERRAND, Doctrine of Right in Practical Philosophy, trans. M. J. Gregor, (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), p. 63.
7. I. KANT [1775–89] (1963) Lectures on Ethics, trans. L. Infield, (Indianapolis and Cambridge, Hackett), p. 124.
8. GERRAND, Lectures on Ethics, trans. L. Infield, (Indianapolis and Cambridge, Hackett), p. 64.
9. KANT, Doctrine of Virtue in Practical Philosophy, §6, p. 548.
10. KANT [1790] (1987) Critique of Judgment, trans. W. S. Pluhar (Indianapolis, Hackett), §65, p. 253.
11. KANT [1775–1789] (1997) Doctrine of Virtue, ß6, p. 547.
12. KANT, Lectures on Ethics, trans. P. Health (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), p. 371.
13. KANT [1775–1789] (1975) Metaphysik der Sitten Vigilantius in Gesammelte Schriften (Berlin, De Gruyter), vol. XXVII, p. 630.
14. KANT (1997), Lectures on Ethics, p. 371.
15. KANT, Doctrine of Virtue, §6, p. 548.
16. KANT [1797] (1914) Tugendlehre in Gesammelte Schriften (Berlin, Königlich Preußische Akademie der Wissenschaften), vol. 6. p. 423.
17. KANT, Critique of Judgment, §66, p. 257.
18. KANT, Doctrine of Right, §30, p. 431.
19. KANT, Doctrine of Right, §49E, p. 474.
20. KANT, Doctrine of Right, p. 392.
21. KANT(1997), Lectures on Ethics, p. 371.
22. KANT, Doctrine of Virtue, p. 518.
23. KANT, Doctrine of Virtue., p. 523.
24. KANT [1784] (1991) Idea of a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose in Political Writings, trans. H. B. Nisbet, 2nd ed. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press), First Proposition, p. 42.
25. KANT, Doctrine of Virtue, p. 395.
26. KANT, Doctrine of Virtue, p. 547.
27. Johann gottlieb Fichte [1810] (1994) Die Republik der Deutschen in Gesamtausgabe, ed. R. Lauth and H. Gliwitzky (Suttgart-Bad Cannstadt, Fromann-Holzboog), vol. 2, 10, pp. 371–426; here, p. 420.
28. KANT, Doctrine of Right, Introduction, §C.
29. KANT (1997), Lectures on Ethics, p. 370.