|
Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 90-96
|
Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: irrigation or probing?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
EYE SURGERY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INFANT;
LACRIMAL DUCT;
LACRIMAL DUCT OCCLUSION;
LAVAGE;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INFANT;
IRRIGATION;
LACRIMAL DUCT OBSTRUCTION;
MALE;
NASOLACRIMAL DUCT;
OPHTHALMOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 0034569496
PISSN: 10118942
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2000.14.2.90 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (20)
|
References (0)
|