Availability and Accuracy of electronic patient data for medical practice assessment

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 77, Issue , 2000, Pages 484-488

  Prins, H ^a   Kruisinga, F ^a   Buller H ^b   Zwetsloot Schonk, Jhm ^c  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b SOPHIA CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; HOSPITALS; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RECORD; PATIENT DATA; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; RADIOLOGY REPORTS; SELECTION CRITERIA;

DIAGNOSIS;

ARTICLE; CHILD; GERMANY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RECORD; MENINGITIS;

CHILD; GERMANY; HOSPITAL RECORDS; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MENINGITIS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 0034568482     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-921-9-484     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Mclntyre N. Evaluation in clinical practice: problems, precedents and principles. J Eval Clin Pract 1995;1(1):5-13.
2. JCAHO. An introduction to Quality Improvement in Health Care; The transition from QA to CQI. Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations 1991
3. Kazandjian VA, Wood P, Lawthers J. Balancing science and practice in indicator development: the Maryland Hospital Association Quality Indicator (QI) project. Int J Qual Health Care 1995;7(l):39-46.
4. Nadzam DM, Turpin R, Hanold LS, White RE. Data-driven performance improvement in health care: the Joint Commission's Indicator Measurement System (IMSystem). Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1993;19(11):492-500.
5. Institute of Medicine (Field M, Lohr, KN. eds). Guidelines for clinical practice: from development to use. Washington DC: National Academic Press, 1992.
6. Iezzoni LI, Foley SM, Daley J, Hughes J, Fisher ES, Heeren T. Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality? [see comments]. JAMA 1992;267(16):2197-203.
7. Wyatt J. Acquisition and use of clinical data for audit and research. J Eval Clin Pract 1995;1(1):15-27.
8. Safran C, Chute CG. Exploration and exploitation of clinical databases. Int J of Biomed Comput 1995;39(l):151-6.
9. McKee M. Routine data: a resource for clinical audit? Quality in Health Care 1993(2): 104-11.
10. McKee M, James P. Using routine data to evaluate quality of care in British hospitals. Med Care 1997;35(10Suppl):OS102-11.
11. Casparie. [Handbook quality of care]. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom, 1993.
12. Bakker AR. An integrated hospital information system in The Netherlands. MD Comput 1990;7(2):91-7.
13. Lodder H, Bakker AR, Zwetsloot JHM. Hospital Information Systems; Technical Choices. In: Bemmel van JH, Musen MA, eds. Handbook of Medical Informatics.
14. Houten, The Netherlands: Bonn Stafleu Van Loghum, 1997
15. Prins H, Buller HA, Zwetsloot-Schonk JHM. Effect of discharge letter-linked diagnosis registration on data quality. International Journal of Quality in Health Care 2000;(in press).