Dentine chips produced by nickel-titanium rotary instruments

Dental Traumatology

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 258-264

  Guppy, D R ^a   Curtis, R V ^a   Pitt Ford, T R ^a,b  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dentine; Root canal files; Root canal instrumentation

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; NICKEL; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM NICKELIDE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTIN; ENDODONTICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ROTATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH PULP; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; DENTIN; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NICKEL; ROOT CANAL PREPARATION; ROTATION; STAINLESS STEEL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 0034567885     PISSN: 16004469     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016006258.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Camps JJ, Pertot WJ. Torsional and stiffness properties of nickel-titanium K files. Int Endod J 1995;28:239-43.
2. Camps JJ, Pertot WJ, Levallois B. Relationship between file size and stiffness of nickel titanium instruments. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995;11:270-3.
3. Wildey WL, Senia ES, Montgomery S. Another look at root canal instrumentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;74:499-507.
4. Maillefer. Maillefer ProFile 0.04. Ballaigues, Switzerland: Maillefer: 1996. p. 1-7.
5. Bryant ST, Thompson SA, Al-Omari MAO, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of Profile rotary nickel-titanium instruments with ISO sized tips in simulated root canals: Part 1. Int Endod J 1998;31:275-81.
6. Kavanagh D, Lumley PJ. An in vitro evaluation of canal preparation using Profile 0.04 and 0.06 taper instruments. Endod Dent Traumatol 1998;14:16-20.
7. Tycom. Extraordinary Quantec endodontic instrumentation. Irvine, CA: Tycom; 1997. p. 1-10.
8. DeVries KL, Williams ML. Mechanisms of adhesion and cohesion at interfaces. In: Pearlman S, editor. The cutting edge. Interfacial dynamics of cutting and grinding. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education & Welfare, No. (NIH) 76-670; 1976. p. 51-76.
9. Materials Information Society. Machining. In: ASM handbook, Vol. 16. ASM; 1992. p. 234-376.
10. Koblitz FF, Tateosian LH, Roemer FD, Steen SD, Glenn JF. An overview of cutting and wear related phenomena in dentistry. In: Pearlman S, editor. The cutting edge. Interfacial dynamics of cutting and grinding. Washington: US Department of Health, Education & Welfare, No. (NIH) 76-670; 1976. p. 151-73.
11. DeVries WR. Analysis of material removal processes. Springer texts in mechanical engineering. Berlin: Springer; 1991.
12. Howell PGT. Assessment of a bur designed for the removal of metal restorations. Br Dent J 1984;156:58-60.
13. Watson TF, Cook RJ. The influence of bur blade concentricity on high-speed tooth-cutting interactions: a video-rate confocal microscopic study. J Dent Res 1995;74:1749-55.
14. Kronenberg IM. Grundzüge der Zerspanungslehre. Berlin: Springer; 1954.
15. Zhang JH. Theory and technique of precision cutting. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1991.
16. Eirich FR. The role of friction and abrasion in the drilling of teeth. In: Pearlman S, editor. The cutting edge. Interfacial dynamics of cutting and grinding. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education & Welfare, No. (NIH) 76-670; 1976. p. 1-49.
17. Jameson MW, Hood JA, Tidmarsh BJ. The effects of dehydration and rehydration on some mechanical properties of human dentine. J Biomech 1993;26:1055-65.
18. Gorczyca FE. Application of metal cutting theory. New York: Industrial Press; 1987. p. 87-8.