Effects of deprivation on engagement in preferred activities by persons with developmental disabilities

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 495-506

  Klatt, Kevin P ^a   Sherman, James A ^b   Sheldon, Jan B ^b  

^a ST CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Deprivation; Developmental disabilities; Engagement; Establishing operations; Preferences

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHILD; DECISION MAKING; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; MENTAL DISEASE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADULT; CHILD; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL RETARDATION; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 0034567678     PISSN: 00218855     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-495     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Allison, J., & Timberlake, W. (1974). Instrumental and contingent saccharin licking in rats: Response deprivation and reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 5, 231-247.
2. Allison, J., & Timberlake, W. (1975). Response deprivation and instrumental performance in the controlled-amount paradigm. Learning and Motivation, 6, 122-142.
3. Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199-210.
4. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
5. Eisenberger, R., Karpman, M., & Trattner, J. (1967). What is the necessary and sufficient condition for reinforcement in the contingency situation? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 342-350.
6. Favell, J. E., & McGimsey, J. F. (1993). Defining an acceptable treatment environment. In R. Van Houten & S. Axelrod (Eds.), Behavior analysis and treatment (pp. 25-45). New York: Plenum Press.
7. Gewirtz, J. L., & Baer, D. M. (1958). The effect of brief social deprivation on behaviors for a social reinforcer. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 56, 49-56.
8. Gottschalk, J. M., Libby, M. E., & Graff, R. B. (2000). The effects of establishing operations on preference assessment outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 85-88.
9. Horner, R. H., Day, H. M., & Day, J. R. (1997). Using neutralizing routines to reduce problem behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 601-614.
10. McGill, P. (1999). Establishing operations: Implications for the assessment, treatment, and prevention of problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 393-418.
11. Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985). Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 249-255.
12. Smith, R. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1997). Antecedent influences on behavior disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 343-375.
13. Timberlake, W., & Allison, J. (1974). Response deprivation: An empirical approach to instrumental performance. Psychological Review, 81, 146-164.
14. Vollmer, T. R., & Iwata, B. A. (1991). Establishing operations and reinforcement effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 279-291.