Imitation of intentional manipulatory actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)

Journal of Comparative Psychology

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 381-391

  Myowa Yamakoshi, Masako ^a   Matsuzawa, Tetsuro ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; IMITATION; PAN TROGLODYTES; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; PAN TROGLODYTES; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0034565719     PISSN: 07357036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.114.4.381     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Butterworth, G. (1994). Theory of mind and the facts of embodiment. In C. Lewis & P. Mitchell (Eds.), Children's early understanding of mind: Origins and development (pp. 115-132). Hove, England: Erlbaum.
3. Byrne, R. W., & Russon, A. E. (1998). Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 667-672.
4. Byrne, R. W., & Tomasello, M. (1995). Do rats ape? Animal Behaviour. 50, 1417-1420.
5. Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1995). Use of social information in problem solving of orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) and human children (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109, 308-320.
6. Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Distinguishing intentional from accidental actions in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and human children (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 192-206.
7. Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen- through 18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 315-330.
8. Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Fujita, K., & Matsuzawa, T. (1990). Delayed figure reconstruction by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104, 345-351.
10. Galef, B. G., Jr. (1988). Imitation in animals: History, definitions, and interpretation of data from the psychological laboratory. In T. R. Zentall & B. G. Galef, Jr. (Eds.), Social teaming: Psychological and biological perspectives (pp. 3-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Heyes, C. M. (1993). Imitation, culture and cognition. Animal Behaviour, 46, 999-1010.
12. Heyes, C. M. (1995). Imitation and flattery: A reply to Byrne and Tomasello. Animal Behaviour, 50, 1421-1424.
13. Heyes, C. M., & Galef, B. G., Jr. (Eds.). (1996). Social learning in animals: The roots of culture. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Kojima, S. (1990). Comparison of auditory functions in the chimpanzee and human. Folia Primatologica, 55, 62-72.
15. Kojima, S. (1991). [The dominance of the left hemisphere in humans: A comparative approach in nonhuman primates]. In K. Kubota (Ed.), The origin of laterality in the brain (pp. 15-31). Tokyo: Asakura syoten. [original in Japanese]
16. Matsuzawa, T. (1985). Use of numbers by a chimpanzee. Nature, 315, 57-59.
17. Matsuzawa, T., Kojima, S., & Shinohara, S. (1997). A brief note on the background of the study of cognition and behavior of chimpanzees by Japanese researchers. Japanese Psychological Research, 39, 133-139.
18. Meltzoff, A. N. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Reenactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31, 838-850.
19. Myowa-Yamakoshi, M., & Matsuzawa, T. (1999). Factors influencing imitation of manipulatory actions in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113, 128-136.
20. Povinelli, D. J. (1991). Social intelligence in monkeys and apes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
21. Povinelli, D. J., Perilloux, H. K., Reaux, J. E., & Bierschwale, D. T. (1998). Young and juvenile chimpanzees' (Pan troglodytes) reactions to intentional versus accidental and inadvertent actions. Behavioural Processes, 42, 205-218.
22. Premack, D. (1986). "Gavagai!" or the future history of the animal language controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515-526.
24. Spence, K. W. (1937). Experimental studies of learning and higher mental processes in ultra-human primates. Psychological Bulletin, 34, 806-850.
25. Tanaka, M. (1995). Object sorting in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Classification based on physical identity, complementarity, and familiarity. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 109, 151-161.
26. Tomasello, M. (1990). Cultural transmission in the tool use and communicatory signaling of chimpanzees? In S. T. Parker & K. R. Gibson (Eds.), "Language" and intelligence in monkeys and apes: Comparative developmental perspectives (pp. 274-311). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27. Tomasello, M. (1996). Do apes ape ? In C. M. Heyes & B. G. Galef (Eds.), Social learning in animals: The roots of culture (pp. 319-346). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Tomasello, M., Call, J., & Gluckman, A. (1997). Comprehension of novel communicative signs by apes and human children. Child Development, 68, 1067-1080.
29. Tomasello, M., Kruger, A. C., & Ratner, H. H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 495-552.
30. Tomonaga, M. (1993). Use of multiple-alternative matching-to-sample in the study of visual search in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 107, 75-83.
31. Visalberghi, E., & Fragaszy, D. M. (1990). Do monkeys ape? In S. Parker & K. Gibson (Eds.), Language and intelligence in monkeys and apes: Comparative developmental perspectives (pp. 247-273). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
32. Whiten, A. (1998). Imitation of the sequential structure of actions by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 270-281.
33. Whiten, A., & Ham, R. (1992). On the nature and evolution of imitation in the animal kingdom: Reappraisal of a century of research. In P. Slater & J. Rosenblatt (Eds.), Advances in the study of behavior (pp. 239-283). New York: Academic Press.