School Performance and Access to Tertiary Education: The Within-Class Selection Model

New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 179-192

  Nash, Roy ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Inequality of educational opportunity; School composition effects; School mix; Social class and attainment

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034561884     PISSN: 00288276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Elley, W., & Irving, J. (1985). The Elley-Irving socio-economic index: 1981 census revision. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 20, 115-128.
2. Fergusson, D. M. (2000). Family socioeconomic status at birth and rates of university participation. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 35, 25-36.
3. Fiske, E. B., & Ladd, H. F. (2000). When schools compete: A cautionary tale. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
4. Gewirtz, S. (1998). Can all schools be successful? An exploration of the determinants of success. Oxford Review of Education, 24, 439-457.
5. Gorard, S., & Fitz, J. (1998). Under starter's orders: The established market, the Cardiff study and the Smithfield project. International Studies in the Sociology of Education, 8, 299-314.
6. Harker, R. K. (2000, December). The impact of de-zoning on New Zealand secondary schools. Paper presented at the meeting of the New Zealand Association for Research in Education, Hamilton.
7. Hawk, K., & Hill, J. (1996). Towards making achieving cool: Achievement in multi cultural high schools. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
8. Lauder, H., & Hughes, D. (1999). Trading in futures: Why education markets don't work. Buckingham: Open University Press.
9. Ministry of Education. (1995). School statistics data [computer disk]. Wellington: Author.
10. Ministry of Education. (1998). School statistics data [computer disk]. Wellington: Author.
11. Ministry of Education. (1999). Tertiary education statistics 1998: Selected tables summarising 31 July student numbers and programme enrolments. Wellington: Author.
12. Nash, R. (1999). School learning: Conversations for the sociology of education (Delta Studies in Education No. 3). Palmerston North: Massey University, Institute for Professional Development and Educational Research.
13. Nash, R., & Harker, R. (1998). Making progress: Adding value in secondary education. Palmerston North: Massey University, ERDC Press.
14. New Zealand Vice-Chancellors' Committee. (1999). Statistical collection. Auckland: University of Auckland.
15. Reay, D. (1998). Class work: Mothers' involvement in their children's primary schooling. London: UCL Press.
16. Shavit, Y., & Blossfield, H. P. (Eds.). (1993). Persisting inequality: Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
17. Sutton, A., & Sonderstrom, I. (1999). Predicting elementary and secondary school achievement with school-related and demographic factors. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 330-338.
18. Taskforce for Improving Participation in Tertiary Education. (1999). Report of the Taskforce for Improving Participation in Tertiary Education. Auckland: University of Auckland.
19. Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (Eds.). (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer.
20. Thrupp, M. (1997). How school mix shapes school processes: A comprehensive study of New Zealand schools. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 32, 53-82.
21. Thrupp, M. (1999). Schools making a difference: Let's be realistic! School mix, school effectiveness and the limits of reform. Buckingham: Open University Press.
22. Young, D. J. (1999, December). The usefulness of value-added research in identifying effective schools. Paper presented at the meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne.