Superconductivity in the two-dimensional Hubbard model

Foundations of Physics

Volumn 30, Issue 12, 2000, Pages 2101-2112

  Metzner, Walter ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034559694     PISSN: 00159018     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1003793524858     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. M. C. Gutzwiller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 159 (1963).
2. J. Kanamori, Prog. Theor. Phys. 30, 275 (1963).
3. J. Hubbard, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A276, 238 (1963).
4. See, for example, The Hubbard Model, A. Montorsi, ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1992).
5. P. W. Anderson, Science 235, 1196 (1987).
6. For a review on d-wave superconductivity from spin fluctuations, see D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rep. 250, 329 (1995).
7. K. Miyake, S. Schmitt-Rink, and C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. B 34, 6554 (1986).
8. D. J. Scalapino, E. Loh, and J. E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B 34, 8190 (1986).
9. N. E. Bickers, D. J. Scalapino, and R. T. Scalettar, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 1, 687 (1987).
10. N. E. Bickers, D. J. Scalapino, and S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 961 (1989).
11. For a review of numerical work, see E. Dagotto, Ret. Mod. Phys. 66, 763 (1994).
12. H. J. Schulz, Europhys. Lett. 4, 609 (1987).
13. I. Dzyaloshinskii, Sov. Phys. JETP 66, 848 (1987).
14. P. Lederer, G. Montambaux, and D. Poilblanc, J. Phys. (Paris) 48, 1613 (1987).
15. For an early review on 1D Fermi systems, see J. Solyom, Adv. Phys. 28, 201 (1979).
16. For a comprehensive modern review on 1D Fermi systems, see J. Voit, Rep. Prog. Phys. 57, 977 (1994).
17. A. T. Zheleznyak, V. M. Yakovenko, and I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, Phys. Rev. B 55, 3200 (1997).
18. D. Zanchi and H. J. Schulz, Z. Phys. B 103, 339 (1997); Europhys. Lett. 44, 235 (1998); cond-mat 9812303.
19. D. Zanchi and H. J. Schulz, Z. Phys. B 103, 339 (1997); Europhys. Lett. 44, 235 (1998); cond-mat 9812303.
20. M. Salmhofer, Commun. Math. Phys. 194, 249 (1998); Renormalization (Springer, 1998).
21. M. Salmhofer, Commun. Math. Phys. 194, 249 (1998); Renormalization (Springer, 1998).
22. C.J. Halboth and W. Metzner, Phys. Rev. B 61, 7364 (2000).
23. J. Polchinski, Nucl. Phys. B231, 269 (1984).
24. See, for example, H. J. Schulz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 1445 (1990), where also the choice of δ as a function of doping is discussed.
25. J. Feldman, J. Magnen, V. Rivasseau, and E. Trubowitz, Europhys. Lett. 24, 437 (1993).
26. R. Hlubina, S. Sorella, and F. Guinea, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1343 (1997).
27. C. J. Halboth and W. Metzner, cond-mat/0003349, Phys. Rev. Lett. (in press).
28. N. Furukawa, T. M. Rice, and M. Salmhofer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3195 (1998).
29. C. Honerkamp, M. Salmhofer, N. Furukawa, and T.M. Rice, cond-mat/9912358.
30. J. González, F. Guinea, and M. A. H. Vozmediano, Europhys. Lett. 34, 711 (1996); Nucl. Phys. B 485, 694 (1997); Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4930 (2000).
31. J. González, F. Guinea, and M. A. H. Vozmediano, Europhys. Lett. 34, 711 (1996); Nucl. Phys. B 485, 694 (1997); Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4930 (2000).
32. J. González, F. Guinea, and M. A. H. Vozmediano, Europhys. Lett. 34, 711 (1996); Nucl. Phys. B 485, 694 (1997); Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4930 (2000).
33. I. Dzyaloshinskii, J. Phys. I 6, 119 (1996).