Overview of the federal home confinement program 1988-1996

Federal Probation

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 11-18

  Gowen, Darren ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034555331     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Beck, J., Klein-Saffron, J., & Wooten, H. (1990, December). Home confinement and the use of electronic monitoring with federal parolees. Federal Probation, 54(4), 22-23.
2. Boone, H. N. (1996). Electronic home confinement judicial and legislative perspectives. American Probation and Parole Association Perspectives, 18-25.
3. Clarkson, J. S., & Weakland, J. J. (1991). Transitional aftercare model for juveniles: Adapting electronic monitoring and home confinement. Journal of Offender Monitoring, 4(2), 1-15.
4. Corbett, R., & Fersch, E. (1985). Home as prison: Use of house arrest. Federal Probation, 49(1).
5. Gowen, D. (1995). Electronic monitoring in the Southern District of Mississippi. Federal Probation, 59(1).
6. Hofer, P. J., & Meierhoefer, B. J. (1987). Home confinement: An evolving sanction in the federal criminal justice system. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
7. Schmidt, P., & Witte, A. D. (1990). Some thoughts on how and when to predict in criminal justice settings. In New directions in the study of justice, law and social control. Plenum Press (p. 265). Phoenix, AZ: School of Justice Studies, Arizona State University.
8. The Federal Home Confinement Program for Defendants and Offenders, Monograph 113 (March 1999), Federal Corrections and Supervision Division, Administrative Office of the United States Courts.
9. United States Sentencing Commission (Guidelines Manual, November 1997), Washington, DC.
10. Vaughn, J. B. (1991). Use of electronic monitoring with juvenile intensive supervision programs. In T. Armstrong (Ed.), Intensive supervision with high-risk youths. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.