The council or the social partners? Ec social policy between diplomacy and collective bargaining

Journal of European Public Policy

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 705-724

  Falkner, Gerda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Atypical work; Collective agreements; EU; European Works Councils; Industrial relations; Parental leave

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034551902     PISSN: 13501763     EISSN: 14664429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13501760010014911     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Agence Europe, Agence internationale pour la presse, daily news bulletin on European affairs, edited by Agence Europe SA, Brussels/Luxembourg.
2. Bercusson, B. (1992) ‘Maastricht: A fundamental change in European labour law’, Industrial Relations Journal 23: 177–90.
3. Buda, D. (1995) ‘Auf dem Weg zu europäischen Arbeitsbeziehungen. Zur Perspektive des Sozialen Dialogs in der Europäischen Union’, in M. Mesch (ed.), Sozialpartnerschaft und Arbeitsbeziehungen in Europa, Wien: Manz, pp. 289–333.
4. Christiansen, T. and Jørgensen, K.E. (1999) ‘The Amsterdam process: a structurationist perspective on EU Treaty reform’, European Integration online Papers 3.1. HTTP: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-001a.htm
5. Dølvik, J.E. (1997) ‘ETUC and Europeanisation of trade unionism in the 1990s’, ARENA Report 1, Oslo. EIRR (European Industrial Relations Review), edited by Andrew Brode, London. EuroAS, Informationsdienst Europäisches Arbeits- und Sozialrecht (monthly information bulletin), edited by M. Bobke et al., Neuwied (Germany): Luchterhand Verlag.
6. Falkner, G. (1998) ‘Social Europe in the 1990s: towards a corporatist policy community’, in J.J. Richardson (ed.), European Public Policy Series, London and New York: Routledge.
7. Fisher, R. and Ury, W. (1981) Getting to Yes: Negotiating an Agreement without Giving In, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
8. Gold, M. and Hall, M. (1994) ‘Statutory European Works Councils: the .nal countdown?’, Industrial Relations Journal 25(3): 177–86.
9. Gorges, M.J. (1996) Euro-Corporatism? Interest Intermediation in the European Community, Lanham/New York/London: University Press of America.
10. Greenwood, J. (1997) ‘Representing interests in the European Union’, The European Union Series, London: Macmillan.
11. Hall, M., Carley, M., Gold, M., Marginson, P. and Sisson, K. (1995) European Works Councils: Planning for the Directive, London: Industrial Relations Research Unit (University of Warwick) and Eclipse Group Ltd.
12. Hornung-Draus, R. (1994) ‘Euro-Betriebsräte – Praxistauglichkeit auf den Prüfstand’, EuroAS 12: 4–6.
13. Keller, B. and Sörries, B. (1998a) ‘The new social dialogue: procedural structuring, first results and perspectives (annual report 1997)’, Industrial Relations Journal 29: 77–98.
14. Keller, B. and Sörries, B. (1998b) ‘The sectoral social dialogue and European social policy – more fantasy, less facts’, European Journal of Industrial Relations 3: 331–48.
15. Keller, B. and Sörries, B. (1999a) ‘The new European social dialogue: old wine in new bottles?’, Journal of European Social Policy 9: 111–25.
16. Keller, B. and Sörries, B. (1999b) ‘Sectoral social dialogues: new opportunities or more impasses?’, Industrial Relations Journal 30(4): 330–44.
17. Leibfried, S. and Pierson, P. (eds) (1995) European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
18. Marks, G., Hooghe, L. and Blank, K. (1996) ‘European integration from the 1980s: state-centric v. multi-level governance’, Journal of Common Market Studies 34(3): 341–77.
19. Moravcsik, A. (1993) ‘Preferences and power in the European Community: a liberal intergovernmentalist approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4): 473–524.
20. Platzer, H.-W. (1997) ‘Industrial relations and European integration – patterns, dynamics and limits of transnationalisations’, in W. Lecher and H.-W. Platzer (eds), European Union – European Industrial Relations? Global Challenges, National Developments and Transnational Dynamics, London: Routledge.
21. Putnam, R.D. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics’, International Organization 42(3): 427–661.
22. Rhodes, M. (1995) ‘A regulatory conundrum: industrial relations and the “social dimension” ’, in S. Leibfried and P. Pierson (eds), Fragmented Social Policy: The European Union’s Social Dimension in Comparative Perspective, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 78–122.
23. Ross, G. (1995) ‘Assessing the Delors era and social policy’, in S. Leibfried and P. Pierson (eds), European Social Policy: Between Fragmentation and Integration, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 357–88.
24. Sabatier, P.A. (1993) ‘Advocacy-Koalitionen, Policy-Wandel und Policy-Lernen: Eine Alternative zur Phasenheuristik’, in A. H´eritier (ed.), Policy-Analyse. Kritik und Neuorientierung (Special Issue of Politische Vierteljahresschrift 25), Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 116–48.
25. Scharpf, F.W. (1998) ‘The joint-decision trap: lessons from German federalism and European integration’, Public Administration 66(3): 239–78.
26. Schmitter, P.C. (1981) ‘Interest intermediation and regime governability in contemporary Western Europe and North America’, in S. Berger (ed.), Organising Interests in Western Europe: Pluralism, Corporatism, and the Transformation of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 287–327.
27. Streeck, W. and Schmitter, P.C. (1994) ‘From national corporatism to transnational pluralism: organized interests in the Single European Market’, in V. Eichener and H. Voelzkow (eds), Europäische Integration und verbandliche Interessenvermittlung, Marburg: Metropolis, pp. 171–215.
28. Tsebelis, G. (1990) Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.