The effects of incorporating concept mapping into computer assisted instruction

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 113-131

  Tan, Seng Chee ^a  

^a 322 McKee Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034551857     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/6BT9-G2PP-RA5B-XGKA     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. J. J. Mintzes and J. H. Wandersee, Research in Science Teaching and Learning: A Human Constructivist View, in Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human Constructivist View, J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, and J. D. Novak (eds.), Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 60-90, 1998.
2. H. J. Klausmeier, Educational Psychology (5th Edition), Harper and Row, New York, p. 276, 1985.
3. J. D. Novak, Learning Theory Applied to the Biology Classroom, The American Biology Teacher, 42:5, pp. 280-285, 1980.
4. J. D. Novak, Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, 1998.
5. J. D. Novak, A Theory of Education, Cornell University Press, 1977.
6. J. A. Heinze-Fry, T. J. Crovello, and J. D. Novak, Integration of Ausubelian Learning Theory and Educational Computing, The American Biology Teacher, 46:3, pp. 152-156, 1984.
7. D. P. Ausubel, Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc., New York, 1968.
8. J. D. Novak and D. B. Gowin, Learning How to Learn, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1984.
9. M. L. Starr and J. S. Krajcik, Concept Maps as a Heuristic for Science Curriculum Development: Toward Improvement in Process and Product, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27:10, pp. 987-1000, 1990.
10. C. L. Mason, Concept Mapping: A Tool to Develop Reflective Science Instruction, Science Education, 76:1, pp. 51-63, 1992.
11. D. H. Jonassen, T. C. Reeves, N. Hong, D. Harvey, and K. Peters, Concept Mapping as Cognitive Learning and Assessment Tools, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8:3/4, pp. 289-308, 1997.
12. W. J. Pankratius, Building an Organised Knowledge Base: Concept Mapping and Achievement in Secondary School Physics, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27:4, pp. 315-333, 1990.
13. O. J. Jegede, F. F. Alaiyemola, and P. A. O. Okebukola, The Effect of Concept Mapping on Student's Anxiety and Achievement in Biology, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27:10, pp. 951-960, 1990.
14. H. Barenholz, A Comprehensive Use of Concept Mapping in Design Instruction and Assessment, Research in Science and Technological Education, 10:1, pp. 37-52, 1992.
15. W. Reader, Computer-Based Tools to Support Learning from Hypertext: Concept Mapping Tools and Beyond, Computers and Education, 22:1-2, pp. 99-106, 1994.
16. P. A. Okebukola and O. J. Jegede, Cognitive Preference and Learning Mode as Determinants of Meaningful Learning through Concept Mapping, Science Education, 72:4, pp. 489-500, 1988.
17. P. B. Horton, A. A. McConney, M. Gallo, A. L. Woods, G. J. Senn, and D. Hamelin, An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Concept Mapping as an Instructional Tool, Science Education, 77:1, pp. 95-111, 1993.
18. M. R. Quillian, Semantic memory, in Semantic Information Processing, M. Minsky (ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 43-67, 1968.
19. K. M. Fisher, Semantic Networking: The New Kid on the Block, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27:10, pp. 1001-1018, 1990.
20. D. H. Jonassen, K. Beissner, and M. A. Yacci, Structural Knowledge: Techniques for Representing, Conveying and Acquiring Structural Knowledge, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, 1993.
21. J. E. Trowbridge and J. H. Wandersee, Theory-driven Graphic Organizers, in Teaching Science for Understanding: A Human Constructivist View, J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, and J. D. Novak, Academic Press, California, pp. 95-128, 1998.
22. R. McAleese, Some Problems of Knowledge Representation in an Authoring Environment: Exteriorization, Anomalous State Meta-Cognition and Self-Confrontation, Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 22, pp. 299-306, 1985.
23. M.Willerman and R. A. Mac Harg, The Concept Map as an Advance Organizer, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28:8, pp. 705-711, 1991.
24. S. B. Reynolds and D. F. Dansereau, The Knowledge Hypermap: An Alternative to Hypertext, Computers Education, 14:5, pp. 409-416, 1990.
25. B. R. Gaines and M. L. G. Shaw, Concept Maps as Hypermedia Components, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43, pp. 322-361, 1995.
26. B. Grabowski, Generative Learning: Past, Present, and Future, in Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, D. H. Jonassen (ed.), Macmillan Library Reference, New York, pp. 897-918, 1996.
27. D. H. Jonassen and S. Wang, Acquiring Structural Knowledge from Semantically Structured Hypertext, Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 20:1, pp. 1-8, 1993.
28. J. D. Novak, Application of Advances in Learning Theory and Philosophy of Science to the Improvement of Chemistry Teaching, Journal of Chemical Education, 61:7, pp. 607-612, 1984.
29. J. D. Novak, D. B. Gowin, and G. T. Johansen, The Use of Concept Mapping and Knowledge Vee Mapping with Junior High School Science Students, Science Education, 67:5, pp. 625-645, 1983.
30. L. Anderson-Inman and L. Zeitz, Computer-Based Concept Mapping: Active Studying for Active Learners, The Computing Teacher, pp. 6-11, 1993.