Discursive ethnomethodology: Analysing power and resistance in talk

Psychology, Crime and Law

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 281-304

  Forrester, Michael A ^a   Ramsden, Christopher A H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^b TAVISTOCK INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Conversation analysis; Discourse; Ethnomethodology; Language; Power

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034551580     PISSN: 1068316X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10683160008409808     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Auburn, T., Drake, S. and Willig, C. (1995). You punched him, didnt you: Versions of violence in accusatory interviews. Discourse and Society, 6(3), 353-386.
2. Berger, P. L. and Luckman, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Allen Lane.
3. Billig, M. (1991). Ideologies and opinions. London: Sage.
4. Billig, M. (1999). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis: an exchange between Michael Billig and Emanuel A. Schegloff. Discourse and Society, 10, 543-582.
5. Bogoch, B. (1994). Power, distance and solidarity: Models of professional-client interaction in an Israeli legal aid setting. Discourse and Society, 5(1), 65-88.
6. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language use: Politeness phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Butchart, A., Lerer, L. B. and Blanche, M. T. (1994). Imaginary constructions and forensic reconstructions of fatal violence against women - Implications for community violence prevention. Forensic Science International, 64(1), 21-34.
8. Coulon, A. (1995). Ethnomethodology. (Vol. 36). London: Sage.
9. Danziger, K. (1976). Interpersonal communication. New York: Pergamon.
10. Edwards, D. Potter, J. and Middleton, D. (1992). Toward a discursive psychology of remembering. Psychologist, 5, 441-447.
11. Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100, 23-41.
12. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
13. Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society, 4, 133-168.
14. Fisher, S. and Groce, S. B. (1990). Accounting practices in medical interviews. Language in Society, 19, 225-250.
15. Forrester, M. A. (1996). Psychology of language: A critical introduction. London: Sage.
16. Gaffin, D. (1996). From 'bugging-out' to 'chilling-out': Manipulating emotion and evoking reason in a forensic psychiatric hospital. Culture Medicine and Psychiatry, 20(2), 199-228.
17. Goffman, B. (1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
18. Gurevitch, Z. (1989). Distance and conversation. Symbolic Interaction, 12, 61-73.
19. Halliday, M. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
20. Harris, S. (1995). Pragmatics and power. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(2), 117-135.
21. Hodge, R. and Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Cambridge: Polity.
22. Home, O. (1991). Police and Criminal Evidenc Act 1984 (s. 66) Codes of Practice, 2nd edn. London: HMSO.
23. Hutchby, I. (1996). Power in discourse: The case of arguments on a British talk radio show. Discourse and Society, 7(4), 481-497.
24. Jonsson, L. and Linell, P. (1991) Story generations: From dialogical interviews to written reports in police interrogations, Text, 11, 419-440.
25. Kress, G. (1988). Linguistic processes in sociocultural practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Kress, G. (1993). Against arbitrariness: The social production of the sign as a foundational issues in critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 1993, 169-191.
27. Kurzon, D. (1995). The right of silence: A socio-pragmatic model of interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(1), 55-69.
28. Leudar, I. and Antaki, C. (1996). Discourse practices, participant status and social psychology. Theory and Psychology, 6, 5-29.
29. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: University Press.
30. MacWhinney, B. (1991). The CHILDES project: Tools for analysing talk. London: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
31. McNay, L. (1994). Foucault: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
32. Molotch, H. L. and Boden, D. (1985). Talking social structure: Discourse, domination and the Watergate Hearings. American Sociological Review, 50, 273-288.
33. Moston, S., Stephenson, G. M. and Williamson, T. M. (1992). The effects of case characteristics on suspect behaviour during police questioning. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 23-40.
34. Moston, S., Stephenson, G. M. and Williamson, T. M. (1993). The incidence, antecedents and consequences of the use of the right to silence during police questioning. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 3 (35-47).
35. Moston, S. J. and Stephenson, G. M. (1993). The changing face of police interrogation. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 3, 101-115.
36. Penman, R. (1987). Discourse in courts: Cooperation, coercion and coherence. Discourse Processes, 10, 201-218.
37. Pennycook, A. (1994). Incommensurable discourses? Applied Linguistics, 15, 115-137.
38. Potter, J. (1996). Right and wrong footing. Theory and Psychology, 6(1), 31-39.
39. Potter, J. and Wetherall, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
40. Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis. London: Sage.
41. Reason, D. (1984). Generalisation from the particular case study: Some foundational considerations., University of Kent, Canterbury.
42. Ricoeur, P. (1971). What is a text? Explanation and Interpretation. The Hague: Nijhoff.
43. Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
44. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
45. Schegloff, E. A. (1997). 'Whose text? Whose context?'. Discourse and Society, 8(165-187).
46. Schegloff, E. A. (1999). 'Schegloffs texts' as 'Billigs data': A critical reply. Critical discourse analysis and conversation analysis: An exchange between Michael Billig and Emanuel A. Schegloff. Discourse and Society, 19, 543-582.
47. Schegloff, E. A. and Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289-327.
48. Stephenson, G. M. and Moston, S. J. (1994). Police interrogation. Psychology Crime and Law, 1(2), 151-157.
49. Timor, U. and Landau, R. (1998) Discourse characteristics in the sociolect of repentant criminals, Discourse &. Society, 9, 363-386.
50. van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4, 2490283.
51. Wasik, M. and Taylor, R. (1995). Blackstone's guide to the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. London: Blackstone.
52. Watson, D. R. (1983). The presentation of victim and motive in discourse: The case of police interrogations and interviews. Victimology: An International Journal, 8(1-2), 31-52.
53. West, C. (1995). Womens competence in conversation. Discourse and Society, 6(1), 107-131.
54. Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9(387-412).
55. Williamson, T. M. (1993). From interrogation to investigative interviewing: Strategic trends in police questioning. Journal Of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 3(2), 89-99.
56. Woofit, R. (1992). Telling tales of the unexpected: The organisation of factual discourse. Hemel-Hempstead: Harverster-Wheatsheaf.