Denial of parole: An inmate perspective

Federal Probation

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 3-10

  West Smith, Mary ^a   Pogrebin, Mark R ^a   Poole, Eric D ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034551318     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Carroll, J.S., Wiener, R.L., Coates, D., Galegher, J., & Alirio, J.J. (1982). Evaluation, diagnosis, and prediction in parole decision making. Law and Society Review, 17, 199-228.
2. Carroll, L., & Mondrick, M.E. (1976). Racial bias in the decision to grant parole. Law and Society Review, 11, 93-107.
3. Cole, G.F., & Logan, C.H. (1977). Parole: The consumer's perspective. Criminal Justice Review, 2, 71-80.
4. Colorado Department of Public Safety (1994). Parole guidelines handbook. Denver, CO: Division of Criminal Justice.
5. Conley, J.A., & Zimmerman, S.E. (1982). Decision making by a part-time parole board: An observational and empirical study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 9, 396-431.
6. Dawson, R. (1978). The decision to grant or deny parole. In B. Atkins and M. Pogrebin (Eds.), The invisible justice system: Discretion and the law (pp. 360-389). Cincinnati: Anderson.
7. Emshoff, J.G., & Davidson, W.S. (1987). The effect of "good time" credit on inmate behavior: A quasi-experiment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 335-351.
8. Fogel, D. (1975). ... We are the living proof: The justice model for corrections. Cincinnati: Anderson.
9. Garber, R.M., & Maslach, C. (1977). The parole hearing: Decision or justification? Law and Human Behavior, 1, 261-281.
10. Gottfredson, D.M., & Ballard, K.B. (1966). Differences in parole decisions associated with decision-makers. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 3, 112-119.
11. Greenholtz v. Nebraska Penal Inmates, 442 U.S. 1 (1979).
12. Haesler, W.T. (1992). The released prisoner and his difficulties to be accepted again as a "normal" citizen. Euro-Criminology, 4, 61-68.
13. Heinz, A.M., Heinz, J.P., Senderowitz, S.J., & Vance, M.A. (1976). Sentencing by parole board: An evaluation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 67, 1-31.
14. Hier, A.P. (1973). Curbing abuse in the decision to grant or deny parole. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Rights Law Review, 8, 419-468.
15. Hoffman, P.B. (1972). Parole policy. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 9, 112-133.
16. Holsti, O.R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17. Lombardi, J.H. (1984). The impact of correctional education on length of incarceration: Non-support for new paroling policy motivation. Journal of Correctional Education, 35, 54-57.
18. Menechino v. Oswald, 430 F.2d 402 (2nd Cir. 1970).
19. Metchik, E. (1992). Judicial views of parole decision processes: A social science perspective. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 18, 135-157.
20. Mitford, J. (1973). Kind and unusual punishment: The prison business. New York: Knopf.
21. Morris, N. (1974). The future of imprisonment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972).
23. Pogrebin, M.R., Poole, E.D., & Regoli, R.M. (1986). Parole decision making in Colorado. Journal of Criminal Justice, 14, 147-155.
24. Rogers, J., & Hayner, N.S. (1968). Optimism and accuracy in perceptions of selected parole prediction items. Social Forces, 46, 388-400.
25. Sacks, H.R. (1977). Promises, performance, and principles: An empirical study of parole decision making in Connecticut. Connecticut Law Review, 9, 347-423.
26. Scarpa v. U.S. Board of Parole, 414 U.S. 934 (1973).
27. Scott, J.E. (1974). The use of discretion in determining the severity of punishment for incarcerated offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 65, 214-224.
28. Starosta, W.J. (1984). Qualitative content analysis: A Burkean perspective. In W. Gudykunst & Y.Y. Kim (Eds.),Methods for intercultural communication research (pp. 185-194). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29. Sudnow, D. (1965). Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender's office. Social Problems, 12, 255-276.
30. Talarico, S.M. (1976). The dilemma of parole decision making. In G.F. Cole (Ed.), Criminal justice: Law and politics, 2nd edition (pp. 447-456). North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.
31. Tarlton v. Clark, 441 F.2d 384 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 934 (1971).
32. Wilkins, L.T., & Gottfredson, D.M. (1973). Information selection and use in parole decision-making: Supplemental report V. Davis, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
33. Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974).