The importance of frameworks for directing empirical questions: Reply to Goodie and Fantino (2000)

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

Volumn 129, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 453-456

  Lovett, Marsha C ^a   Schunn, Christian D ^b  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MENTAL FUNCTION; NOTE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL;

DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; LEARNING; MENTAL PROCESSES; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 0034540753     PISSN: 00963445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.4.453     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Estes, W. K. (1956). The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 134-140.
2. Goodie, A. S., & Fantino, E. (1995). An experientially derived base-rate error in humans. Psychological Science, 6, 101-106.
3. Goodie, A. S., & Fantino, E. (1996). Learning to commit or avoid the base-rate error. Nature, 380, 247-249.
4. Goodie, A. S., & Fantino, E. (1999). Base rates versus sample accuracy: Competition for control in human matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 155-169.
5. Goodie, A. S., & Fantino, E. (2000). Representing the task in Bayesian reasoning: Comment on Lovett and Schunn (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 449-452.
6. Lovett, M. C., & Anderson, J. R. (1996). History of success and current context in problem solving: Combined influences on operator selection. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 168-217.
7. Lovett, M. C., Daily, L. Z., & Reder, L. M. (2000). A source activation theory of working memory: Cross-task prediction of performance in ACT-R. Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 99-118.
8. Lovett, M. C., & Schunn, C. D. (1999). Task representations, strategy variability, and base-rate neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 107-130.
9. Maddox, W. T. (1999). On the dangers of averaging across observers when comparing decision bound models and generalized context models of categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(2), 354-375.
10. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
11. Schunn, C. D. (1999, August). Exploring individual variability using ACT-R. Paper presented at the Sixth Annual ACT-R Workshop, Fairfax, VA.
12. Siegler, R. S. (1987). The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 250-264.
13. Thorndike, E. L. (1932). The fundamentals of learning. New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1982). Evidential impact of base rates. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 153-160). New York: Cambridge University Press.